Long-Term Risk of Dementia After TIA: A Population-Wide Matched Cohort Study.

IF 8.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology Pub Date : 2026-10-27 Epub Date: 2026-09-23 DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000218554
Raed A Joundi, Jiming Fang, Peter C Austin, Eric E Smith, Amy Ying Xin Yu, Vladimir Hachinski, Luciano A Sposato, Aravind Ganesh, Mukul Sharma, Moira K Kapral
{"title":"Long-Term Risk of Dementia After TIA: A Population-Wide Matched Cohort Study.","authors":"Raed A Joundi, Jiming Fang, Peter C Austin, Eric E Smith, Amy Ying Xin Yu, Vladimir Hachinski, Luciano A Sposato, Aravind Ganesh, Mukul Sharma, Moira K Kapral","doi":"10.1212/WNL.0000000000218554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Long-term risk of dementia after TIA remains poorly characterized, despite a known impact on cognition. We aimed to quantify the rate, relative risk, and time course of incident dementia after TIA compared with a matched reference population (controls) and individuals with stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a population-wide cohort study using linked administrative health data for the province of Ontario, Canada (2002-2022). Adults with a first TIA were identified from emergency department visits or hospital admissions and followed from 90 days after the index event. Individuals with prior dementia, prior stroke, early death, or long-term care admission were excluded. Patients with TIA were matched to population controls on age, sex, neighborhood-level deprivation, rurality, and vascular comorbidities. Patients with TIA were also matched to those with first stroke. Incident dementia was ascertained using a validated algorithm based on hospital diagnoses, physician claims, and dementia-specific medications. Cause-specific and subdistribution hazard models accounting for competing risk of death were used for 1-, 5-, and 10-year risk of dementia, with time-varying analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 113,081 matched patients with TIA (mean age 70 years; 50% female), dementia was diagnosed in 19.3% over a mean follow-up of 7.11 years (SD 5.16). Dementia rates after TIA were consistently higher than in matched controls across all time horizons (overall rate 2.71 vs 2.03 per 100 person-years). The hazard ratio for dementia after TIA was highest within the first year (hazard ratio [HR] 1.75, 95% CI 1.66-1.85) and remained elevated over 20 years of follow-up (overall HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.31-1.36). Compared with stroke, the hazard of dementia was lower after TIA early on (1-year HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.64-0.70) but converged and became similar after 5 years of follow-up. Dementia incidence substantially exceeded stroke incidence, and adjustment for incident stroke minimally attenuated results.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>TIA is associated with a large and sustained increase in dementia risk, approaching that observed after stroke over long-term follow-up. Dementia occurs far more frequently than incident stroke after TIA, highlighting cognitive decline as a major long-term complication and a target for prevention with new strategies that include and extend beyond stroke prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":19256,"journal":{"name":"Neurology","volume":"107 8","pages":"e218554"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000218554","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Long-term risk of dementia after TIA remains poorly characterized, despite a known impact on cognition. We aimed to quantify the rate, relative risk, and time course of incident dementia after TIA compared with a matched reference population (controls) and individuals with stroke.

Methods: We conducted a population-wide cohort study using linked administrative health data for the province of Ontario, Canada (2002-2022). Adults with a first TIA were identified from emergency department visits or hospital admissions and followed from 90 days after the index event. Individuals with prior dementia, prior stroke, early death, or long-term care admission were excluded. Patients with TIA were matched to population controls on age, sex, neighborhood-level deprivation, rurality, and vascular comorbidities. Patients with TIA were also matched to those with first stroke. Incident dementia was ascertained using a validated algorithm based on hospital diagnoses, physician claims, and dementia-specific medications. Cause-specific and subdistribution hazard models accounting for competing risk of death were used for 1-, 5-, and 10-year risk of dementia, with time-varying analyses.

Results: Among 113,081 matched patients with TIA (mean age 70 years; 50% female), dementia was diagnosed in 19.3% over a mean follow-up of 7.11 years (SD 5.16). Dementia rates after TIA were consistently higher than in matched controls across all time horizons (overall rate 2.71 vs 2.03 per 100 person-years). The hazard ratio for dementia after TIA was highest within the first year (hazard ratio [HR] 1.75, 95% CI 1.66-1.85) and remained elevated over 20 years of follow-up (overall HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.31-1.36). Compared with stroke, the hazard of dementia was lower after TIA early on (1-year HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.64-0.70) but converged and became similar after 5 years of follow-up. Dementia incidence substantially exceeded stroke incidence, and adjustment for incident stroke minimally attenuated results.

Discussion: TIA is associated with a large and sustained increase in dementia risk, approaching that observed after stroke over long-term follow-up. Dementia occurs far more frequently than incident stroke after TIA, highlighting cognitive decline as a major long-term complication and a target for prevention with new strategies that include and extend beyond stroke prevention.

TIA后痴呆的长期风险:一项全人群匹配队列研究。
背景和目的:尽管已知TIA对认知的影响,但TIA后痴呆的长期风险仍不清楚。我们的目的是量化与匹配的参考人群(对照组)和中风患者相比,TIA后发生痴呆的比率、相对风险和时间过程。方法:我们使用加拿大安大略省相关的行政卫生数据(2002-2022)进行了一项全人群队列研究。首次TIA的成年人从急诊科就诊或住院就诊中确定,并从指数事件发生后90天开始随访。排除了既往有痴呆、卒中、早期死亡或长期护理的个体。TIA患者在年龄、性别、社区贫困、农村状况和血管合并症方面与对照人群相匹配。TIA患者也与首次中风患者相匹配。使用基于医院诊断、医生声明和痴呆症特异性药物的有效算法确定偶发性痴呆。考虑竞争死亡风险的原因特异性和亚分布风险模型用于1年、5年和10年痴呆风险,并进行时变分析。结果:在113,081例匹配的TIA患者(平均年龄70岁,50%为女性)中,在平均7.11年的随访期间(SD 5.16),有19.3%的患者被诊断为痴呆。在所有时间范围内,TIA后的痴呆率始终高于匹配的对照组(总体发病率2.71 vs 2.03 / 100人年)。TIA后痴呆的风险比在第一年最高(风险比[HR] 1.75, 95% CI 1.66-1.85),并在20年的随访中保持升高(总风险比1.34,95% CI 1.31-1.36)。与卒中相比,TIA早期痴呆的风险较低(1年HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.64-0.70),但在5年随访后趋于一致并趋于相似。痴呆的发病率大大超过了卒中的发病率,并且对卒中发生率的调整最小程度地减弱了结果。讨论:TIA与痴呆风险的持续大幅增加有关,接近中风后长期随访观察到的风险。脑缺血发作后发生痴呆的频率远高于偶发性脑卒中,这突出表明认知能力下降是主要的长期并发症,也是包括并扩展到脑卒中预防之外的新策略的预防目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology
Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1973
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology, the official journal of the American Academy of Neurology, aspires to be the premier peer-reviewed journal for clinical neurology research. Its mission is to publish exceptional peer-reviewed original research articles, editorials, and reviews to improve patient care, education, clinical research, and professionalism in neurology. As the leading clinical neurology journal worldwide, Neurology targets physicians specializing in nervous system diseases and conditions. It aims to advance the field by presenting new basic and clinical research that influences neurological practice. The journal is a leading source of cutting-edge, peer-reviewed information for the neurology community worldwide. Editorial content includes Research, Clinical/Scientific Notes, Views, Historical Neurology, NeuroImages, Humanities, Letters, and position papers from the American Academy of Neurology. The online version is considered the definitive version, encompassing all available content. Neurology is indexed in prestigious databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Biological Abstracts®, PsycINFO®, Current Contents®, Web of Science®, CrossRef, and Google Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书