ESIC series, Paper 2: Applying the Double diamond model and codesign principles to the Evidence Synthesis Infrastructure Collaborative (ESIC) planning process.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Zoe Jordan, John N Lavis, Laurenz Mahlanza-Langer, Rhona Mijumbi-Deve, Karla Soares-Weiser
{"title":"ESIC series, Paper 2: Applying the Double diamond model and codesign principles to the Evidence Synthesis Infrastructure Collaborative (ESIC) planning process.","authors":"Zoe Jordan, John N Lavis, Laurenz Mahlanza-Langer, Rhona Mijumbi-Deve, Karla Soares-Weiser","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The production and use of evidence for decision-making remains fragmented, inefficient, and inequitable. The Evidence Synthesis Infrastructure Collaborative (ESIC) planning process builds on the Global Evidence Commission and the SHOW ME the Evidence features. It was launched in late 2024 to strengthen collaboration across the evidence ecosystem. The objective was to describe the methodology behind the ESIC planning process, including the strategies used to make it open and equitable.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over 6 months in 2025, the Double Diamond model was combined with co-design principles within a convergence research framework. An open call drew 382 expressions of interest, and 145 participants were recruited across 6 groups. Groups were balanced by geography, sector, interest holder category, language, career stage, and gender. The four stages were mapped to specific activities: discover (capability mapping), define (capability maturity assessment), develop (solution ideation), and deliver (prioritization using an impact-effort matrix with equity and legitimacy lenses). Interest holder and open consultations informed each stage, and a parallel costing stream modeled what implementation would require.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the participants, 52% were from the Global South and 69% from sectors other than health. Capability varied considerably across regions, sectors, and resource settings. There were gaps in data sharing, artificial intelligence governance, and sustainable capacity strengthening. Prioritization separated quick wins from long-term, high-impact initiatives, and both were brought together in the ESIC Roadmap and the Cape Town Consensus Charter.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining the Double Diamond model with co-design and convergence research gave ESIC a rigorous, adaptable planning methodology. Other global collaborations tackling complex societal challenges could use the same approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":51079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"112519"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112519","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: The production and use of evidence for decision-making remains fragmented, inefficient, and inequitable. The Evidence Synthesis Infrastructure Collaborative (ESIC) planning process builds on the Global Evidence Commission and the SHOW ME the Evidence features. It was launched in late 2024 to strengthen collaboration across the evidence ecosystem. The objective was to describe the methodology behind the ESIC planning process, including the strategies used to make it open and equitable.

Methods: Over 6 months in 2025, the Double Diamond model was combined with co-design principles within a convergence research framework. An open call drew 382 expressions of interest, and 145 participants were recruited across 6 groups. Groups were balanced by geography, sector, interest holder category, language, career stage, and gender. The four stages were mapped to specific activities: discover (capability mapping), define (capability maturity assessment), develop (solution ideation), and deliver (prioritization using an impact-effort matrix with equity and legitimacy lenses). Interest holder and open consultations informed each stage, and a parallel costing stream modeled what implementation would require.

Results: Of the participants, 52% were from the Global South and 69% from sectors other than health. Capability varied considerably across regions, sectors, and resource settings. There were gaps in data sharing, artificial intelligence governance, and sustainable capacity strengthening. Prioritization separated quick wins from long-term, high-impact initiatives, and both were brought together in the ESIC Roadmap and the Cape Town Consensus Charter.

Conclusion: Combining the Double Diamond model with co-design and convergence research gave ESIC a rigorous, adaptable planning methodology. Other global collaborations tackling complex societal challenges could use the same approach.

ESIC系列:论文2:将双钻石模型和协同设计原则应用于证据综合基础设施协作(ESIC)规划过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
320
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Epidemiology strives to enhance the quality of clinical and patient-oriented healthcare research by advancing and applying innovative methods in conducting, presenting, synthesizing, disseminating, and translating research results into optimal clinical practice. Special emphasis is placed on training new generations of scientists and clinical practice leaders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书