Willie L Williams, Ericka P Zimmerman, Jason A Whitfield, Jeannette M Wade, Driscoll DeVaul, Jewell J Dickson-Clayton, Sarah Diamalou, Christen Goodson
{"title":"An Interprofessional Commentary on Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Efforts in Allied Health Education.","authors":"Willie L Williams, Ericka P Zimmerman, Jason A Whitfield, Jeannette M Wade, Driscoll DeVaul, Jewell J Dickson-Clayton, Sarah Diamalou, Christen Goodson","doi":"10.21091/jah.2026.03061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As allied health professionals are front-line workers and drivers of population health, it is vital that their practice is rooted in and centered on quality care and equitable health for all. In recent years, justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion (JEDI) initiatives have multiplied and become more robust, particularly within allied health professions. JEDI initiatives help eliminate health disparities related to social factors like race, class, and gender, largely by creating an allied healthcare workforce that represents the culture and ideology of the patients it serves. However, growing skepticism and disdain for JEDI initiatives, driven by political, social, and ideological factors, threaten to reverse progress made in advancing equity in education and professional practice. This paper begins with conceptualizing JEDI and barriers to the usage of related terminology, highlights barriers to promoting JEDI in allied healthcare education, as well as strategies to advance health equity and autonomy. Using a team of interprofessional scholars, representing various branches of allied health, we offer a framework for allied health professionals to counter rising criticisms around JEDI initiatives and policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":35979,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allied Health","volume":"55 3","pages":"509-518"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allied Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21091/jah.2026.03061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As allied health professionals are front-line workers and drivers of population health, it is vital that their practice is rooted in and centered on quality care and equitable health for all. In recent years, justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion (JEDI) initiatives have multiplied and become more robust, particularly within allied health professions. JEDI initiatives help eliminate health disparities related to social factors like race, class, and gender, largely by creating an allied healthcare workforce that represents the culture and ideology of the patients it serves. However, growing skepticism and disdain for JEDI initiatives, driven by political, social, and ideological factors, threaten to reverse progress made in advancing equity in education and professional practice. This paper begins with conceptualizing JEDI and barriers to the usage of related terminology, highlights barriers to promoting JEDI in allied healthcare education, as well as strategies to advance health equity and autonomy. Using a team of interprofessional scholars, representing various branches of allied health, we offer a framework for allied health professionals to counter rising criticisms around JEDI initiatives and policies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Allied Health is the official publication of the Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions (ASAHP) . The Journal is the only interdisciplinary allied health periodical, publishing scholarly works related to research and development, feature articles, research abstracts and book reviews. Readers of The Journal comprise allied health leaders, educators, faculty and students. Subscribers to The Journal consist of domestic and international college and university libraries, health organizations and hospitals. Almost 20% of subscribers, in the last three years, have been from outside of the United States. Subscribers include the World Health Organization, the American Medical Association and major universities.