The Response of Dorsal Lung Compliance to Prone Positioning Differs by Body Mass Index in ARDS.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Timothy G Gaulton, Caio César Araújo Morais, Roberta Ribeiro De Santis Santiago, Glasiele C Alcala, Carolyn J LaVita, Marcelo Britto Passos Amato, Maurizio Cereda, Lorenzo Berra
{"title":"The Response of Dorsal Lung Compliance to Prone Positioning Differs by Body Mass Index in ARDS.","authors":"Timothy G Gaulton, Caio César Araújo Morais, Roberta Ribeiro De Santis Santiago, Glasiele C Alcala, Carolyn J LaVita, Marcelo Britto Passos Amato, Maurizio Cereda, Lorenzo Berra","doi":"10.1177/19433654261487238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Excess adipose tissue compresses dorsal lung regions that PEEP may not fully reverse in the supine position. Prone positioning, in combination with PEEP, can unload the lung, but whether regional responses differ by obesity is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We measured regional lung compliance using electrical impedance tomography in 14 mechanically ventilated subjects with COVID-19 ARDS (6 with BMI ≥35 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and 8 with BMI <30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). Measurements were taken during decremental PEEP titration in supine and prone positions, following recruitment maneuvers. Regional compliance was derived from pixel-level impedance change within each region of interest, divided by driving pressure and predicted body weight. Bayesian multilevel gamma regression models with patient-level random effects estimated the 3-way interaction between position, BMI group, and lung region on regional compliance, adjusted for age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall cohort had a median P<sub>aO<sub>2</sub></sub>/F<sub>IO<sub>2</sub></sub> of 108 mm Hg and median respiratory system compliance of 29 mL/cm H<sub>2</sub>O in the supine position. At the PEEP that produced the highest total respiratory system compliance in each position, the increase in dorsal regional compliance with prone positioning was greater in subjects with BMI ≥35 kg/m<sup>2</sup> compared with subjects with BMI <30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (difference-in-differences: 0.16 mL/cm H<sub>2</sub>O/kg, 95% credible interval: 0.01 to 0.37; posterior probability: 98.0%). Regional compliance in ventral and central lung regions did not credibly differ between BMI groups. The direction and magnitude of the change in dorsal lung compliance between BMI groups were consistent across PEEP levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prone positioning was associated with a greater increase in dorsal lung compliance in subjects with BMI ≥35 kg/m<sup>2</sup> compared with subjects with BMI <30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Our findings suggest that the response of regional compliance to prone positioning in ARDS differs by body mass index, identifying obesity as a population in whom positional unloading may be more effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":"19433654261487238"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19433654261487238","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Excess adipose tissue compresses dorsal lung regions that PEEP may not fully reverse in the supine position. Prone positioning, in combination with PEEP, can unload the lung, but whether regional responses differ by obesity is unknown.

Methods: We measured regional lung compliance using electrical impedance tomography in 14 mechanically ventilated subjects with COVID-19 ARDS (6 with BMI ≥35 kg/m2 and 8 with BMI <30 kg/m2). Measurements were taken during decremental PEEP titration in supine and prone positions, following recruitment maneuvers. Regional compliance was derived from pixel-level impedance change within each region of interest, divided by driving pressure and predicted body weight. Bayesian multilevel gamma regression models with patient-level random effects estimated the 3-way interaction between position, BMI group, and lung region on regional compliance, adjusted for age.

Results: The overall cohort had a median PaO2/FIO2 of 108 mm Hg and median respiratory system compliance of 29 mL/cm H2O in the supine position. At the PEEP that produced the highest total respiratory system compliance in each position, the increase in dorsal regional compliance with prone positioning was greater in subjects with BMI ≥35 kg/m2 compared with subjects with BMI <30 kg/m2 (difference-in-differences: 0.16 mL/cm H2O/kg, 95% credible interval: 0.01 to 0.37; posterior probability: 98.0%). Regional compliance in ventral and central lung regions did not credibly differ between BMI groups. The direction and magnitude of the change in dorsal lung compliance between BMI groups were consistent across PEEP levels.

Conclusions: Prone positioning was associated with a greater increase in dorsal lung compliance in subjects with BMI ≥35 kg/m2 compared with subjects with BMI <30 kg/m2. Our findings suggest that the response of regional compliance to prone positioning in ARDS differs by body mass index, identifying obesity as a population in whom positional unloading may be more effective.

ARDS患者俯卧位对肺背侧顺应性的反应随体重指数的不同而不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书