Stochastic appointment scheduling with patient-and-time-dependent probability distributions.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Soheyl Khalilpourazari, Hossein Hashemi Doulabi
{"title":"Stochastic appointment scheduling with patient-and-time-dependent probability distributions.","authors":"Soheyl Khalilpourazari, Hossein Hashemi Doulabi","doi":"10.1007/s10729-026-09788-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Outpatient appointment scheduling, in settings ranging from primary care practices to specialty consultation clinics, requires balancing provider idle time, overtime, and patient waiting time. Uncertainty in service times, patient punctuality, and attendance makes scheduling a challenging task, resulting in high clinic costs and low patient satisfaction. Addressing these uncertain factors is particularly difficult because they follow patient-and-time-dependent probability distributions. Existing models fail to simultaneously incorporate such distributions and often assume identical distributions for all patients in all time slots, mainly due to the increased modeling and solution complexity. In this research, we propose a novel stochastic programming model that captures an exponential number of scenarios using a polynomial number of variables and constraints without relying on sampling methods. We incorporate patient-dependent probability distributions for service times, and patient-and-time-dependent distributions for no-shows and arrival times, and we discuss how these distributions can be estimated from routinely collected electronic health record data. To enhance the model, we explore the impact of personalized reminders on no-show rates and scheduling effectiveness. Besides, we investigate how changes in attendance rates, influenced by incentives or negative clinic experiences, impact the appointment scheduling efficiency. The results demonstrate that, using our proposed model, we optimally solve several instances with up to 14 patients in a reasonable computational time. The generated schedules substantially outperform classical Bailey-type appointment rules, whose best-performing variant increases the total expected cost by 97% on average relative to our schedules. Moreover, the generated schedules reduce total costs by 34% on average by incorporating patient-dependent service times, 12% by considering patient-and-time-dependent unpunctuality, and 67% by integrating patient-and-time-dependent no-shows. Furthermore, we show that personalized reminders have the potential to reduce total costs by 23%, and sensitivity analyses confirm that these benefits are robust to moderate estimation errors in the input distributions. Our approach has a significant potential to improve the efficiency of healthcare services by reducing patient waiting time, provider idle time, and overtime costs, and it highlights the value of personalized communication strategies in improving patient attendance.</p>","PeriodicalId":12903,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Science","volume":"29 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-026-09788-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Outpatient appointment scheduling, in settings ranging from primary care practices to specialty consultation clinics, requires balancing provider idle time, overtime, and patient waiting time. Uncertainty in service times, patient punctuality, and attendance makes scheduling a challenging task, resulting in high clinic costs and low patient satisfaction. Addressing these uncertain factors is particularly difficult because they follow patient-and-time-dependent probability distributions. Existing models fail to simultaneously incorporate such distributions and often assume identical distributions for all patients in all time slots, mainly due to the increased modeling and solution complexity. In this research, we propose a novel stochastic programming model that captures an exponential number of scenarios using a polynomial number of variables and constraints without relying on sampling methods. We incorporate patient-dependent probability distributions for service times, and patient-and-time-dependent distributions for no-shows and arrival times, and we discuss how these distributions can be estimated from routinely collected electronic health record data. To enhance the model, we explore the impact of personalized reminders on no-show rates and scheduling effectiveness. Besides, we investigate how changes in attendance rates, influenced by incentives or negative clinic experiences, impact the appointment scheduling efficiency. The results demonstrate that, using our proposed model, we optimally solve several instances with up to 14 patients in a reasonable computational time. The generated schedules substantially outperform classical Bailey-type appointment rules, whose best-performing variant increases the total expected cost by 97% on average relative to our schedules. Moreover, the generated schedules reduce total costs by 34% on average by incorporating patient-dependent service times, 12% by considering patient-and-time-dependent unpunctuality, and 67% by integrating patient-and-time-dependent no-shows. Furthermore, we show that personalized reminders have the potential to reduce total costs by 23%, and sensitivity analyses confirm that these benefits are robust to moderate estimation errors in the input distributions. Our approach has a significant potential to improve the efficiency of healthcare services by reducing patient waiting time, provider idle time, and overtime costs, and it highlights the value of personalized communication strategies in improving patient attendance.

具有病人和时间依赖概率分布的随机预约调度。
从初级保健实践到专业咨询诊所,门诊预约安排需要平衡提供者空闲时间、加班时间和患者等待时间。服务时间、患者准时率和出勤的不确定性使安排成为一项具有挑战性的任务,导致诊所成本高,患者满意度低。处理这些不确定因素尤其困难,因为它们遵循患者和时间相关的概率分布。由于建模和求解的复杂性增加,现有的模型不能同时纳入这样的分布,并且经常假设所有患者在所有时间段的分布相同。在这项研究中,我们提出了一种新的随机规划模型,该模型使用多项式数量的变量和约束来捕获指数数量的场景,而不依赖于抽样方法。我们合并了服务时间依赖于患者的概率分布,以及缺席和到达时间依赖于患者和时间的分布,并讨论了如何从常规收集的电子健康记录数据中估计这些分布。为了增强模型,我们探讨了个性化提醒对缺勤率和调度效率的影响。此外,我们还研究了受激励或负面诊所体验影响的出勤率变化对预约安排效率的影响。结果表明,使用我们提出的模型,我们在合理的计算时间内最优地解决了多达14名患者的几个实例。生成的时间表大大优于经典的bailey类型的预约规则,其最佳表现的变体相对于我们的时间表平均增加了97%的总预期成本。此外,生成的时间表通过纳入与患者相关的服务时间平均降低了34%的总成本,通过考虑与患者和时间相关的不守时情况平均降低了12%,通过整合与患者和时间相关的缺勤情况平均降低了67%。此外,我们表明,个性化提醒有可能将总成本降低23%,敏感性分析证实,这些好处对输入分布中的适度估计误差是稳健的。我们的方法在通过减少患者等待时间、提供者空闲时间和加班成本来提高医疗保健服务效率方面具有巨大的潜力,并且它突出了个性化沟通策略在提高患者出勤率方面的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Care Management Science
Health Care Management Science HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Health Care Management Science publishes papers dealing with health care delivery, health care management, and health care policy. Papers should have a decision focus and make use of quantitative methods including management science, operations research, analytics, machine learning, and other emerging areas. Articles must clearly articulate the relevance and the realized or potential impact of the work. Applied research will be considered and is of particular interest if there is evidence that it was implemented or informed a decision-making process. Papers describing routine applications of known methods are discouraged. Authors are encouraged to disclose all data and analyses thereof, and to provide computational code when appropriate. Editorial statements for the individual departments are provided below. Health Care Analytics Departmental Editors: Margrét Bjarnadóttir, University of Maryland Nan Kong, Purdue University With the explosion in computing power and available data, we have seen fast changes in the analytics applied in the healthcare space. The Health Care Analytics department welcomes papers applying a broad range of analytical approaches, including those rooted in machine learning, survival analysis, and complex event analysis, that allow healthcare professionals to find opportunities for improvement in health system management, patient engagement, spending, and diagnosis. We especially encourage papers that combine predictive and prescriptive analytics to improve decision making and health care outcomes. The contribution of papers can be across multiple dimensions including new methodology, novel modeling techniques and health care through real-world cohort studies. Papers that are methodologically focused need in addition to show practical relevance. Similarly papers that are application focused should clearly demonstrate improvements over the status quo and available approaches by applying rigorous analytics. Health Care Operations Management Departmental Editors: Nilay Tanik Argon, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Bob Batt, University of Wisconsin The department invites high-quality papers on the design, control, and analysis of operations at healthcare systems. We seek papers on classical operations management issues (such as scheduling, routing, queuing, transportation, patient flow, and quality) as well as non-traditional problems driven by everchanging healthcare practice. Empirical, experimental, and analytical (model based) methodologies are all welcome. Papers may draw theory from across disciplines, and should provide insight into improving operations from the perspective of patients, service providers, organizations (municipal/government/industry), and/or society. Health Care Management Science Practice Departmental Editor: Vikram Tiwari, Vanderbilt University Medical Center The department seeks research from academicians and practitioners that highlights Management Science based solutions directly relevant to the practice of healthcare. Relevance is judged by the impact on practice, as well as the degree to which researchers engaged with practitioners in understanding the problem context and in developing the solution. Validity, that is, the extent to which the results presented do or would apply in practice is a key evaluation criterion. In addition to meeting the journal’s standards of originality and substantial contribution to knowledge creation, research that can be replicated in other organizations is encouraged. Papers describing unsuccessful applied research projects may be considered if there are generalizable learning points addressing why the project was unsuccessful. Health Care Productivity Analysis Departmental Editor: Jonas Schreyögg, University of Hamburg The department invites papers with rigorous methods and significant impact for policy and practice. Papers typically apply theory and techniques to measuring productivity in health care organizations and systems. The journal welcomes state-of-the-art parametric as well as non-parametric techniques such as data envelopment analysis, stochastic frontier analysis or partial frontier analysis. The contribution of papers can be manifold including new methodology, novel combination of existing methods or application of existing methods to new contexts. Empirical papers should produce results generalizable beyond a selected set of health care organizations. All papers should include a section on implications for management or policy to enhance productivity. Public Health Policy and Medical Decision Making Departmental Editors: Ebru Bish, University of Alabama Julie L. Higle, University of Southern California The department invites high quality papers that use data-driven methods to address important problems that arise in public health policy and medical decision-making domains. We welcome submissions that develop and apply mathematical and computational models in support of data-driven and model-based analyses for these problems. The Public Health Policy and Medical Decision-Making Department is particularly interested in papers that: Study high-impact problems involving health policy, treatment planning and design, and clinical applications; Develop original data-driven models, including those that integrate disease modeling with screening and/or treatment guidelines; Use model-based analyses as decision making-tools to identify optimal solutions, insights, recommendations. Articles must clearly articulate the relevance of the work to decision and/or policy makers and the potential impact on patients and/or society. Papers will include articulated contributions within the methodological domain, which may include modeling, analytical, or computational methodologies. Emerging Topics Departmental Editor: Alec Morton, University of Strathclyde Emerging Topics will handle papers which use innovative quantitative methods to shed light on frontier issues in healthcare management and policy. Such papers may deal with analytic challenges arising from novel health technologies or new organizational forms. Papers falling under this department may also deal with the analysis of new forms of data which are increasingly captured as health systems become more and more digitized.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书