Tyler M Compton, Theodore A Joaquin, Mark A Plantz, Jason D Tegethoff, Srikanth N Divi
{"title":"Outcomes, Quality of Life, and Value in Cervical Spine Oncology: Neurological Recovery, Patient-Reported Outcomes, and Prognostic Decision-Making.","authors":"Tyler M Compton, Theodore A Joaquin, Mark A Plantz, Jason D Tegethoff, Srikanth N Divi","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000002167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Narrative review.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide an overview of outcomes, cost-effectiveness, local control, survivorship, and prognostic decision-making in cervical spine oncology.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Cervical spine oncology includes both metastatic and primary tumors, each with distinct treatment goals and oncologic considerations. Cervical spine tumors can impair quality of life through pain, neurological deficits, and mechanical instability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review synthesizes current literature on neurological and functional outcomes, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), cost-effectiveness, local control, survivorship, and prognostic decision-making in cervical spine oncology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prospective multicenter studies demonstrate significant improvements in pain, neurological function, and HRQOL after surgery for metastatic cervical spine disease. Separation surgery followed by stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) achieves high rates of local control in appropriately selected patients. Cost-effectiveness is greatest among patients with acute neurological compromise and favorable survival prognoses. We additionally review prognostic classification systems, machine-learning algorithms, and outcomes in primary cervical spine tumors including cervical chordoma.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cervical spine oncology requires individualized multidisciplinary treatment. Prospective outcomes data, validated patient-reported outcome instruments, modern radiation strategies, and prognostic algorithms support contemporary decision-making in patients with cervical spine tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000002167","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study design: Narrative review.
Objective: To provide an overview of outcomes, cost-effectiveness, local control, survivorship, and prognostic decision-making in cervical spine oncology.
Summary of background data: Cervical spine oncology includes both metastatic and primary tumors, each with distinct treatment goals and oncologic considerations. Cervical spine tumors can impair quality of life through pain, neurological deficits, and mechanical instability.
Methods: This review synthesizes current literature on neurological and functional outcomes, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), cost-effectiveness, local control, survivorship, and prognostic decision-making in cervical spine oncology.
Results: Prospective multicenter studies demonstrate significant improvements in pain, neurological function, and HRQOL after surgery for metastatic cervical spine disease. Separation surgery followed by stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) achieves high rates of local control in appropriately selected patients. Cost-effectiveness is greatest among patients with acute neurological compromise and favorable survival prognoses. We additionally review prognostic classification systems, machine-learning algorithms, and outcomes in primary cervical spine tumors including cervical chordoma.
Conclusions: Cervical spine oncology requires individualized multidisciplinary treatment. Prospective outcomes data, validated patient-reported outcome instruments, modern radiation strategies, and prognostic algorithms support contemporary decision-making in patients with cervical spine tumors.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure.
Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.