'I'm a figment of your imagination': epistemic injustice as generative of microinvalidations, microinsults and microassaults directed at bisexual men.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Sara Townsend, Brian Dodge, Wendy Bostwick
{"title":"'I'm a figment of your imagination': epistemic injustice as generative of microinvalidations, microinsults and microassaults directed at bisexual men.","authors":"Sara Townsend, Brian Dodge, Wendy Bostwick","doi":"10.1080/13691058.2026.2730472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research suggests that microaggressions may contribute to well-documented health disparities among bisexual men. The microaggressions typology framework may provide insights into <i>how</i> microaggressions are conveyed, complementing thematic studies that capture <i>what</i> microaggressions communicate. This study examined the microaggressions encountered by 31 bisexual men (24 cisgender, 7 transgender; 14 Black, 8 Latino, 5 multiracial, 3 White, 1 Asian) using semi-structured interviews. Results indicate that bisexual men primarily experience microinvalidations (nullifications of their experiences), including messages that bisexual men are not real and are simply confused. We posit that the preponderance of microinvalidations reflects the everyday enactment of epistemic injustice (wronging bisexuals in their capacity as knowers), which derives from prevailing notions of sexuality as a binary. Participants additionally reported microinsults (demeaning messages) and microassaults (intentionally discriminatory communication), which we argue serve to keep bisexual men silent. Intersectional themes provide insight into how racialised and gendered norms shape sexuality-based microaggressions. Results point to how microaggressions may impact the health of bisexual men, with critical implications for prevailing frameworks of stress.</p>","PeriodicalId":10799,"journal":{"name":"Culture, Health & Sexuality","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13637492/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture, Health & Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2026.2730472","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research suggests that microaggressions may contribute to well-documented health disparities among bisexual men. The microaggressions typology framework may provide insights into how microaggressions are conveyed, complementing thematic studies that capture what microaggressions communicate. This study examined the microaggressions encountered by 31 bisexual men (24 cisgender, 7 transgender; 14 Black, 8 Latino, 5 multiracial, 3 White, 1 Asian) using semi-structured interviews. Results indicate that bisexual men primarily experience microinvalidations (nullifications of their experiences), including messages that bisexual men are not real and are simply confused. We posit that the preponderance of microinvalidations reflects the everyday enactment of epistemic injustice (wronging bisexuals in their capacity as knowers), which derives from prevailing notions of sexuality as a binary. Participants additionally reported microinsults (demeaning messages) and microassaults (intentionally discriminatory communication), which we argue serve to keep bisexual men silent. Intersectional themes provide insight into how racialised and gendered norms shape sexuality-based microaggressions. Results point to how microaggressions may impact the health of bisexual men, with critical implications for prevailing frameworks of stress.

“我是你想象中的虚构”:认知上的不公正产生了针对双性恋男性的微无效、微侮辱和微攻击。
研究表明,微侵犯可能是双性恋男性健康差异的原因之一。微侵犯类型框架可以提供关于微侵犯如何传达的见解,补充了捕捉微侵犯传达内容的专题研究。本研究采用半结构化访谈法,对31名双性恋男性(24名顺性男性、7名跨性别男性、14名黑人、8名拉丁裔、5名多种族男性、3名白人、1名亚裔)的微侵犯行为进行了调查。结果表明,双性恋男性主要经历的是微无效(他们的经历无效),包括双性恋男性不是真实存在的信息,只是感到困惑。我们认为,微无效化的优势反映了日常认知上的不公正(以认知者的身份对双性恋者进行了错误对待),这源于普遍的二元性观念。参与者还报告了微侮辱(贬低信息)和微攻击(故意歧视的沟通),我们认为这是为了让双性恋男性保持沉默。交叉主题提供了对种族化和性别化规范如何塑造基于性的微侵犯的见解。研究结果表明,微侵犯可能会影响双性恋男性的健康,并对普遍存在的压力框架产生重要影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
80
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书