A Scoping Review of Menstrual Cycle Technologies for Ovulation Tracking.

IF 1.9
Theresa M Stujenske, Ruth M Foreman, David A Nolfi
{"title":"A Scoping Review of Menstrual Cycle Technologies for Ovulation Tracking.","authors":"Theresa M Stujenske, Ruth M Foreman, David A Nolfi","doi":"10.1097/CIN.0000000000001624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent developments in menstrual cycle tracking technologies that record physiological biomarkers of ovulation allow women to conveniently track their menstrual health data. The rapid pace of development of these technologies has made it challenging for health care professionals to evaluate their clinical validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The purpose of this scoping review was to synthesize the current evidence regarding menstrual cycle tracking technologies that record physiological biomarkers of ovulation. The PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) was used to guide this review. Embase, PubMed, and Scopus databases were searched for publications regarding menstrual cycle tracking technologies that record physiological biomarkers of ovulation. The authors performed a thorough search of the literature using several keywords and database subject headings. Inclusion criteria were primary research articles available in English, assessed humans, and assessed menstrual cycle tracking technologies available to US consumers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Title and abstract screening of all potentially relevant populations (n=2845) resulted in a full-text review of 139 publications. Twenty-three publications met the inclusion criteria, and 16 menstrual cycle tracking technologies that record physiological biomarkers of ovulation were identified, including temperature devices, urine hormone devices, and others.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The existing evidence for menstrual cycle tracking technologies relies on observational study designs and lacks diverse study populations, limiting the broader clinical applicability of these technologies. With further research, these technologies hold significant potential to improve menstrual health monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":520598,"journal":{"name":"Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000001624","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent developments in menstrual cycle tracking technologies that record physiological biomarkers of ovulation allow women to conveniently track their menstrual health data. The rapid pace of development of these technologies has made it challenging for health care professionals to evaluate their clinical validity.

Methods: The purpose of this scoping review was to synthesize the current evidence regarding menstrual cycle tracking technologies that record physiological biomarkers of ovulation. The PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) was used to guide this review. Embase, PubMed, and Scopus databases were searched for publications regarding menstrual cycle tracking technologies that record physiological biomarkers of ovulation. The authors performed a thorough search of the literature using several keywords and database subject headings. Inclusion criteria were primary research articles available in English, assessed humans, and assessed menstrual cycle tracking technologies available to US consumers.

Results: Title and abstract screening of all potentially relevant populations (n=2845) resulted in a full-text review of 139 publications. Twenty-three publications met the inclusion criteria, and 16 menstrual cycle tracking technologies that record physiological biomarkers of ovulation were identified, including temperature devices, urine hormone devices, and others.

Discussion: The existing evidence for menstrual cycle tracking technologies relies on observational study designs and lacks diverse study populations, limiting the broader clinical applicability of these technologies. With further research, these technologies hold significant potential to improve menstrual health monitoring.

月经周期技术用于排卵跟踪的范围综述。
背景:月经周期跟踪技术的最新发展记录了排卵的生理生物标志物,使妇女能够方便地跟踪她们的月经健康数据。这些技术的快速发展为卫生保健专业人员评估其临床有效性带来了挑战。方法:本综述的目的是综合目前关于记录排卵生理生物标志物的月经周期跟踪技术的证据。用于范围审查的PRISMA扩展(PRISMA- scr)用于指导本次审查。在Embase、PubMed和Scopus数据库中检索有关记录排卵生理生物标志物的月经周期跟踪技术的出版物。作者使用几个关键词和数据库主题标题对文献进行了彻底的搜索。纳入标准是可获得的英文主要研究文章,评估人类,评估美国消费者可用的月经周期跟踪技术。结果:对所有潜在相关人群(n=2845)进行标题和摘要筛选,得出139篇出版物的全文综述。23篇出版物符合纳入标准,并确定了16种记录排卵生理生物标志物的月经周期跟踪技术,包括温度装置、尿激素装置等。讨论:月经周期跟踪技术的现有证据依赖于观察性研究设计,缺乏多样化的研究人群,限制了这些技术更广泛的临床适用性。随着进一步的研究,这些技术在改善月经健康监测方面具有巨大的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书