Alisha R Pershad, Sophia Song, Esther Lee, Adam Thompson-Harvey, Neelima Tummala, Punam Thakkar
{"title":"How Medical School Experiences Bias Specialty Selection: Perspectives From Current U.S. Otolaryngology Residents.","authors":"Alisha R Pershad, Sophia Song, Esther Lee, Adam Thompson-Harvey, Neelima Tummala, Punam Thakkar","doi":"10.1177/00034894261485442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined the medical school experiences of current U.S. otolaryngology residents to better understand gender biases that may persist within the specialty and to inform strategies that could improve workforce excellence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A voluntary, IRB-approved survey was distributed to U.S. otolaryngology residency program directors and coordinators for distribution to their residents. Gender-stratified analyses were performed using Chi-squared tests, Mann-Whitney tests, and thematic analysis. A <i>P</i>-value < .05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 137 complete surveys, 58% of respondents identified as female (mean age 29.7 ± 2.8 years). Factors that deterred female respondents from pursuing otolaryngology included a perceived requirement of high USMLE board scores (<i>P</i> < .05), concerns about racial, ethnic, gender, and sexual diversity (<i>P</i> < .05), and concerns about time limitations for raising a family (<i>P</i> < .0005). Female respondents were significantly more likely to have witnessed or experienced gender discrimination (<i>P</i> < .05) and received negative comments about their clinical abilities (<i>P</i> < .0005) compared to their male counterparts. Having a gender-concordant mentor significantly influenced career choice among female respondents (<i>P</i> < .0005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Persistent gender disparities continue to shape otolaryngology residents' experiences and perceptions, from mentorship access to perceptions of bias. Key targets for intervention include gender-concordant mentorship, early medical school exposure, and addressing inherent bias through educational and department-wide initiatives. Meaningful progress requires collective institutional commitment to structural and cultural change to ensure a more supportive environment for all trainees.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>4.</p>","PeriodicalId":520787,"journal":{"name":"The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"34894261485442"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894261485442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study examined the medical school experiences of current U.S. otolaryngology residents to better understand gender biases that may persist within the specialty and to inform strategies that could improve workforce excellence.
Methods: A voluntary, IRB-approved survey was distributed to U.S. otolaryngology residency program directors and coordinators for distribution to their residents. Gender-stratified analyses were performed using Chi-squared tests, Mann-Whitney tests, and thematic analysis. A P-value < .05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: Of 137 complete surveys, 58% of respondents identified as female (mean age 29.7 ± 2.8 years). Factors that deterred female respondents from pursuing otolaryngology included a perceived requirement of high USMLE board scores (P < .05), concerns about racial, ethnic, gender, and sexual diversity (P < .05), and concerns about time limitations for raising a family (P < .0005). Female respondents were significantly more likely to have witnessed or experienced gender discrimination (P < .05) and received negative comments about their clinical abilities (P < .0005) compared to their male counterparts. Having a gender-concordant mentor significantly influenced career choice among female respondents (P < .0005).
Conclusions: Persistent gender disparities continue to shape otolaryngology residents' experiences and perceptions, from mentorship access to perceptions of bias. Key targets for intervention include gender-concordant mentorship, early medical school exposure, and addressing inherent bias through educational and department-wide initiatives. Meaningful progress requires collective institutional commitment to structural and cultural change to ensure a more supportive environment for all trainees.
目的:本研究调查了当前美国耳鼻喉科住院医师的医学院经历,以更好地了解该专业可能存在的性别偏见,并为提高员工素质提供策略。方法:一份自愿的、经irb批准的调查被分发给美国耳鼻喉科住院医师项目主任和协调员,以分发给他们的住院医师。使用卡方检验、Mann-Whitney检验和专题分析进行性别分层分析。p值结果:在137份完整的调查中,58%的被调查者为女性(平均年龄29.7±2.8岁)。阻止女性受访者追求耳鼻喉科的因素包括对高USMLE评分的感知要求(P P P P P P P P结论:持续的性别差异继续塑造耳鼻喉科住院医师的经历和看法,从指导获得到偏见的看法。干预的主要目标包括性别和谐的指导、早期在医学院的接触,以及通过教育和全部门的举措解决固有的偏见。有意义的进展需要对结构和文化变革作出集体体制承诺,以确保为所有受训人员提供更有利的环境。证据等级:4。