PATients' views of Health and WORK advice (PATcHWORK) study.

IF 1.7
K Lin, R Singhal, V Parsons, K Walker-Bone, G Wynne-Jones, E Godfrey, E Wainwright, I Madan
{"title":"PATients' views of Health and WORK advice (PATcHWORK) study.","authors":"K Lin, R Singhal, V Parsons, K Walker-Bone, G Wynne-Jones, E Godfrey, E Wainwright, I Madan","doi":"10.1093/occmed/kqag102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A variety of health and work support (H&WS) services are available in the UK, yet little is known about patients' preferences for such support.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To develop an understanding of patients' preferences for H&WS, including the type of support desired, optimal setting, timing and mode of delivery, appropriate providers, integration with existing services and views on employers' receptiveness to H&WS information.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Participants were recruited through existing research networks and professional societies following informed consent. Interview questions were developed in collaboration with the University of Aberdeen Epidemiology Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement group. Interview responses were analysed using inductive and deductive reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen interviews were conducted with participants (11 females, 4 males; mean age 48.9 years), generating six overarching themes. Three themes related to 'health and work issues': disability discrimination, lack of H&WS awareness and trust concerns. Three themes identified key 'H&WS factors' for employment: flexible working, accessibility to support, and the importance of feeling valued and supported. Participants desired simplified yet holistic and flexible H&WS delivery. Key policy and practice considerations based on insights from this study include improving H&WS publicity through NHS websites and medical waiting areas, integration of work discussions into medical consultations and employer provision of evidence-based health promotion programmes and manager training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides valuable insights into patients' preferences about H&WS delivery, highlighting crucial factors for employers and national policymakers to consider, aligned with the recently published Mayfield report.</p>","PeriodicalId":520727,"journal":{"name":"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqag102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A variety of health and work support (H&WS) services are available in the UK, yet little is known about patients' preferences for such support.

Aims: To develop an understanding of patients' preferences for H&WS, including the type of support desired, optimal setting, timing and mode of delivery, appropriate providers, integration with existing services and views on employers' receptiveness to H&WS information.

Methods: We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. Participants were recruited through existing research networks and professional societies following informed consent. Interview questions were developed in collaboration with the University of Aberdeen Epidemiology Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement group. Interview responses were analysed using inductive and deductive reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Fifteen interviews were conducted with participants (11 females, 4 males; mean age 48.9 years), generating six overarching themes. Three themes related to 'health and work issues': disability discrimination, lack of H&WS awareness and trust concerns. Three themes identified key 'H&WS factors' for employment: flexible working, accessibility to support, and the importance of feeling valued and supported. Participants desired simplified yet holistic and flexible H&WS delivery. Key policy and practice considerations based on insights from this study include improving H&WS publicity through NHS websites and medical waiting areas, integration of work discussions into medical consultations and employer provision of evidence-based health promotion programmes and manager training.

Conclusions: This study provides valuable insights into patients' preferences about H&WS delivery, highlighting crucial factors for employers and national policymakers to consider, aligned with the recently published Mayfield report.

患者对健康和工作建议的看法(PATcHWORK)研究。
背景:各种各样的健康和工作支持(H&WS)服务在英国是可用的,但很少了解患者的偏好,这种支持。目的:了解患者对健康与卫生服务的偏好,包括所需支持的类型、最佳设置、提供的时间和模式、合适的提供者、与现有服务的整合以及雇主对健康与卫生服务信息的接受程度。方法:采用半结构化访谈法进行定性研究。参与者是根据知情同意通过现有的研究网络和专业协会招募的。访谈问题是与阿伯丁大学流行病学患者和公众参与和参与小组合作开发的。访谈反应分析采用归纳和演绎反身主题分析。结果:对参与者进行了15次访谈(11名女性,4名男性,平均年龄48.9岁),产生了6个总体主题。与“健康和工作问题”有关的三个主题是:残疾歧视、缺乏对健康和工作的认识和信任问题。三个主题确定了就业的关键“H&WS因素”:灵活的工作,可获得的支持,以及感觉被重视和支持的重要性。参与者希望简化但整体和灵活的H&WS交付。基于本研究的见解,关键的政策和实践考虑包括通过NHS网站和医疗候诊区改善卫生和保健宣传,将工作讨论纳入医疗咨询,雇主提供基于证据的健康促进计划和管理人员培训。结论:这项研究提供了有价值的见解,关于患者对卫生和保健服务的偏好,突出了雇主和国家政策制定者需要考虑的关键因素,与最近发表的梅菲尔德报告一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书