Fourfold higher graft failure risk with isolated BPTB versus hamstring ACL reconstruction with ALL in patients under 25 years: A prespecified subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
Fabio Santamaria, Alessandro Carrozzo, Charles Pioger, Thais Dutra Vieira, Victor Sonnery-Cottet, Jean-Marie Fayard, Mathieu Thaunat, Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet
{"title":"Fourfold higher graft failure risk with isolated BPTB versus hamstring ACL reconstruction with ALL in patients under 25 years: A prespecified subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Fabio Santamaria, Alessandro Carrozzo, Charles Pioger, Thais Dutra Vieira, Victor Sonnery-Cottet, Jean-Marie Fayard, Mathieu Thaunat, Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet","doi":"10.1002/ksa.70617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare 5-year graft failure rates between isolated bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (BPTB-ACLR) and hamstring tendon (HT)-ACLR combined with anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) in patients younger than 25 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prespecified subgroup analysis was performed on patients younger than 25 years enroled in a prospective comparative study. Patients underwent either isolated ACLR using a BPTB-ACLR or hamstring ACLR combined with ALLR (HT-ACLR + ALLR). The primary outcome was graft failure at 5 years. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcome measures (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Lysholm and Tegner scores). Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and log-rank testing. Multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify independent risk factors for graft failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 281 patients younger than 25 years, with 134 undergoing isolated BPTB-ACLR and 147 undergoing HT-ACLR + ALLR. At 5 years, graft failure occurred in 22 patients (16.4%) in the isolated BPTB-ACLR group and in 7 patients (4.8%) in the HT-ACLR + ALLR group (p = 0.0013). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significantly improved graft survival in the HT-ACLR + ALLR group (log-rank p = 0.0008). On multivariate analysis, isolated BPTB-ACLR was independently associated with a higher risk of graft failure compared with HT-ACLR + ALLR (odds ratio 4.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-11.3; p = 0.0007; hazard ratio 4.2; 95% CI 1.9-10.7; p = 0.0002). Clinical outcome scores were comparable between groups at follow-up across all patient-reported measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This secondary analysis of a RCT with 5-year follow-up showed that, in patients younger than 25 years, HT-ACLR combined with ALLR was associated with a significantly lower risk of graft failure compared with isolated BPTB-ACLR, whereas patient-reported clinical outcomes were comparable between groups.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level I, randomized controlled trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":520702,"journal":{"name":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.70617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To compare 5-year graft failure rates between isolated bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (BPTB-ACLR) and hamstring tendon (HT)-ACLR combined with anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) in patients younger than 25 years.
Methods: A prespecified subgroup analysis was performed on patients younger than 25 years enroled in a prospective comparative study. Patients underwent either isolated ACLR using a BPTB-ACLR or hamstring ACLR combined with ALLR (HT-ACLR + ALLR). The primary outcome was graft failure at 5 years. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcome measures (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Lysholm and Tegner scores). Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and log-rank testing. Multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify independent risk factors for graft failure.
Results: The analysis included 281 patients younger than 25 years, with 134 undergoing isolated BPTB-ACLR and 147 undergoing HT-ACLR + ALLR. At 5 years, graft failure occurred in 22 patients (16.4%) in the isolated BPTB-ACLR group and in 7 patients (4.8%) in the HT-ACLR + ALLR group (p = 0.0013). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significantly improved graft survival in the HT-ACLR + ALLR group (log-rank p = 0.0008). On multivariate analysis, isolated BPTB-ACLR was independently associated with a higher risk of graft failure compared with HT-ACLR + ALLR (odds ratio 4.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-11.3; p = 0.0007; hazard ratio 4.2; 95% CI 1.9-10.7; p = 0.0002). Clinical outcome scores were comparable between groups at follow-up across all patient-reported measures.
Conclusion: This secondary analysis of a RCT with 5-year follow-up showed that, in patients younger than 25 years, HT-ACLR combined with ALLR was associated with a significantly lower risk of graft failure compared with isolated BPTB-ACLR, whereas patient-reported clinical outcomes were comparable between groups.
Level of evidence: Level I, randomized controlled trial.