Evaluating New AI Cell Foundation Models on Challenging Kidney Pathology Cases Unaddressed by Previous Foundation Models.

Runchen Wang, Junlin Guo, Siqi Lu, Ruining Deng, Zhengyi Lu, Yanfan Zhu, Yuechen Yang, Chongyu Qu, Yu Wang, Shilin Zhao, Catie Chang, Mitchell Wilkes, Mengmeng Yin, Haichun Yang, Yuankai Huo
{"title":"Evaluating New AI Cell Foundation Models on Challenging Kidney Pathology Cases Unaddressed by Previous Foundation Models.","authors":"Runchen Wang, Junlin Guo, Siqi Lu, Ruining Deng, Zhengyi Lu, Yanfan Zhu, Yuechen Yang, Chongyu Qu, Yu Wang, Shilin Zhao, Catie Chang, Mitchell Wilkes, Mengmeng Yin, Haichun Yang, Yuankai Huo","doi":"10.1117/12.3086185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate cell nuclei segmentation is critical for downstream tasks in kidney pathology and remains a major challenge due to the morphological diversity and imaging variability of renal tissues. While our prior work has evaluated early-generation AI cell foundation models in this domain, the effectiveness of recent cell foundation models remains unclear. In this study, we benchmark advanced AI cell foundation models (2025), including CellViT++ variants and Cellpose-SAM, against three widely used cell foundation models developed prior to 2024, using a diverse large-scale set of kidney image patches within a human-in-the-loop rating framework. We further performed fusion-based ensemble evaluation and model agreement analysis to assess the segmentation capabilities of the different models. Our results show that CellViT++ [Virchow] yields the highest standalone performance with 40.3% of predictions rated as \"Good\" on a curated set of 2,091 challenging samples, outperforming all prior models. In addition, our fused model achieves 62.2% \"Good\" predictions and only 0.4% \"Bad\", substantially reducing segmentation errors. Notably, the fusion model (2025) successfully resolved the majority of challenging cases that remained unaddressed in our previous study. These findings demonstrate the potential of AI cell foundation model development in renal pathology and provide a curated dataset of challenging samples to support future kidney-specific model refinement.</p>","PeriodicalId":74505,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering","volume":"13932 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13591460/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3086185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate cell nuclei segmentation is critical for downstream tasks in kidney pathology and remains a major challenge due to the morphological diversity and imaging variability of renal tissues. While our prior work has evaluated early-generation AI cell foundation models in this domain, the effectiveness of recent cell foundation models remains unclear. In this study, we benchmark advanced AI cell foundation models (2025), including CellViT++ variants and Cellpose-SAM, against three widely used cell foundation models developed prior to 2024, using a diverse large-scale set of kidney image patches within a human-in-the-loop rating framework. We further performed fusion-based ensemble evaluation and model agreement analysis to assess the segmentation capabilities of the different models. Our results show that CellViT++ [Virchow] yields the highest standalone performance with 40.3% of predictions rated as "Good" on a curated set of 2,091 challenging samples, outperforming all prior models. In addition, our fused model achieves 62.2% "Good" predictions and only 0.4% "Bad", substantially reducing segmentation errors. Notably, the fusion model (2025) successfully resolved the majority of challenging cases that remained unaddressed in our previous study. These findings demonstrate the potential of AI cell foundation model development in renal pathology and provide a curated dataset of challenging samples to support future kidney-specific model refinement.

评估新的AI细胞基础模型对先前基础模型未解决的肾脏病理病例的挑战性。
准确的细胞核分割对于肾脏病理的下游任务至关重要,并且由于肾组织的形态多样性和成像变异性,仍然是一个主要的挑战。虽然我们之前的工作已经评估了该领域的早期人工智能细胞基础模型,但最近的细胞基础模型的有效性仍不清楚。在这项研究中,我们将先进的人工智能细胞基础模型(2025),包括CellViT++变体和Cellpose-SAM,与2024年之前开发的三种广泛使用的细胞基础模型进行基准测试,在人类在环评级框架内使用多种大规模肾脏图像补丁集。我们进一步进行了基于融合的集成评估和模型一致性分析,以评估不同模型的分割能力。我们的结果表明,CellViT++ [Virchow]产生了最高的独立性能,在2,091个具有挑战性的样本中,有40.3%的预测被评为“良好”,优于所有先前的模型。此外,我们的融合模型实现了62.2%的“好”预测,只有0.4%的“坏”预测,大大减少了分割错误。值得注意的是,融合模型(2025)成功地解决了我们之前研究中尚未解决的大多数具有挑战性的病例。这些发现证明了人工智能细胞基础模型开发在肾脏病理学中的潜力,并提供了一个精心设计的具有挑战性的样本数据集,以支持未来肾脏特异性模型的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书