Evaluation of made-for-purpose ring cutter devices for the removal of modern hard ring materials.

IF 2
CJEM Pub Date : 2026-09-21 DOI:10.1007/s43678-026-01257-5
Jeffrey J Perry, Sara Khaksari, Gabriel Sandino-Gold, Marie-Joe Nemnom, Andy Pan
{"title":"Evaluation of made-for-purpose ring cutter devices for the removal of modern hard ring materials.","authors":"Jeffrey J Perry, Sara Khaksari, Gabriel Sandino-Gold, Marie-Joe Nemnom, Andy Pan","doi":"10.1007/s43678-026-01257-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Ring entrapment is a common problem in emergency departments. With modern durable metals such as tungsten carbide, titanium, and stainless steel, traditional tools may be ineffective. We evaluated the performance of four purpose-designed ring cutter devices on three hardened ring materials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical providers tested four ring cutting devices-the M5118 Stainless Steel Manual Ring Cutter (Acme United Corporation), Dolphin Ring Cutter (Ring Rescue Inc.), GEM-II Ring Cutter (A-Z Tec Medical Ltd.), and Raptor Shears (Leatherman Tools)-on tungsten carbide, titanium, and stainless steel rings (2.5 mm × 6 mm, size 9-10). Outcomes included successful ring removal, time to removal, ease of use, and user confidence. Research assistants timed each cut. Participants rated ease of use and confidence after each cut.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one participants (mean age 40 ± 10 years; 76% female) included seven physicians, nine registered nurses, two registered practical nurses, and three patient care attendants. Participants combined performed 242 unique ring cut attempts. The Stainless Steel Manually-Operated Ring Cutter failed on all rings. The Raptor Shears succeeded on titanium 25% of the time but failed on others. The GEM-II Ring Cutter succeeded in 62% of tungsten carbide, 65% of titanium, and 83% of stainless steel rings. The Dolphin Ring Cutter successfully removed all rings. Mean (SD) cut times in seconds were 251 (92) for Dolphin, 561 (239) for GEM-II, and 292 (160) for Raptor. Dolphin scored highest for ease of use 4.8 (0.5) and confidence 4.8 (0.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For cutting modern hard ring metals, the Dolphin Ring Cutter was the optimal tool of the four assessed, being able to cut through all three materials. The manual ring cutter and trauma shears could not cut through these hardened metals. The Dolphin Ring Cutter was found to be easy to use, and participants had a high degree of confidence in this tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-026-01257-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Ring entrapment is a common problem in emergency departments. With modern durable metals such as tungsten carbide, titanium, and stainless steel, traditional tools may be ineffective. We evaluated the performance of four purpose-designed ring cutter devices on three hardened ring materials.

Methods: Medical providers tested four ring cutting devices-the M5118 Stainless Steel Manual Ring Cutter (Acme United Corporation), Dolphin Ring Cutter (Ring Rescue Inc.), GEM-II Ring Cutter (A-Z Tec Medical Ltd.), and Raptor Shears (Leatherman Tools)-on tungsten carbide, titanium, and stainless steel rings (2.5 mm × 6 mm, size 9-10). Outcomes included successful ring removal, time to removal, ease of use, and user confidence. Research assistants timed each cut. Participants rated ease of use and confidence after each cut.

Results: Twenty-one participants (mean age 40 ± 10 years; 76% female) included seven physicians, nine registered nurses, two registered practical nurses, and three patient care attendants. Participants combined performed 242 unique ring cut attempts. The Stainless Steel Manually-Operated Ring Cutter failed on all rings. The Raptor Shears succeeded on titanium 25% of the time but failed on others. The GEM-II Ring Cutter succeeded in 62% of tungsten carbide, 65% of titanium, and 83% of stainless steel rings. The Dolphin Ring Cutter successfully removed all rings. Mean (SD) cut times in seconds were 251 (92) for Dolphin, 561 (239) for GEM-II, and 292 (160) for Raptor. Dolphin scored highest for ease of use 4.8 (0.5) and confidence 4.8 (0.4).

Conclusion: For cutting modern hard ring metals, the Dolphin Ring Cutter was the optimal tool of the four assessed, being able to cut through all three materials. The manual ring cutter and trauma shears could not cut through these hardened metals. The Dolphin Ring Cutter was found to be easy to use, and participants had a high degree of confidence in this tool.

用于去除现代硬环材料的专用环切割装置的评估。
目的:环夹是急诊科常见的问题。有了碳化钨、钛和不锈钢等现代耐用金属,传统的工具可能就失效了。我们评估了四种专门设计的环切割装置在三种硬化环材料上的性能。方法:医疗供应商测试了四种环切割设备- M5118不锈钢手动环切割器(Acme联合公司),Dolphin环切割器(ring Rescue公司),GEM-II环切割器(A-Z Tec医疗有限公司)和Raptor剪切器(Leatherman工具)-在硬质合金,钛和不锈钢环上(2.5 mm × 6mm,尺寸9-10)。结果包括环移除成功、移除时间、易用性和用户信心。研究助理对每次切割进行计时。参与者对每次切割后的易用性和信心进行了评分。结果:21名参与者(平均年龄40±10岁,76%为女性)包括7名医生、9名注册护士、2名注册实用护士和3名患者护理人员。参与者总共进行了242次独特的环切尝试。不锈钢手动环切机在所有环上都失效。猛禽剪刀在钛上的成功率为25%但在其他地方却失败了。GEM-II型环切机成功切割了62%的碳化钨、65%的钛和83%的不锈钢环。Dolphin环切割器成功移除所有环。Dolphin的平均(SD)切割时间为251(92)秒,GEM-II为561(239)秒,Raptor为292(160)秒。“海豚”的易用性为4.8分(0.5分),信赖度为4.8分(0.4分)。结论:对于切割现代硬环金属,Dolphin环切割机是四种评估的最佳工具,能够切割所有三种材料。手工环剪和创伤剪无法切割这些硬化的金属。海豚环切器被发现很容易使用,参与者对这个工具有很高的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书