Opportunistic Screening for Cardiovascular and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Biomarkers and Implications for Downstream Care: A Retrospective Lung Cancer Screening Cohort Study.

Lauren K Groner, Maria Patricia Puello, Chukwuma Onyebeke, Charlene Thomas, Valentina Marulanda Corzo, Tashina Andrade, Hanna Haile, Anthony Saleh, Jessica M Pena, Daniel B Green, Laura C Pinheiro
{"title":"Opportunistic Screening for Cardiovascular and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Biomarkers and Implications for Downstream Care: A Retrospective Lung Cancer Screening Cohort Study.","authors":"Lauren K Groner, Maria Patricia Puello, Chukwuma Onyebeke, Charlene Thomas, Valentina Marulanda Corzo, Tashina Andrade, Hanna Haile, Anthony Saleh, Jessica M Pena, Daniel B Green, Laura C Pinheiro","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2026.09.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Examine the prevalence of low-dose CT (LDCT) biomarkers for cardiovascular disease (coronary artery calcium [CAC]) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (emphysema) in asymptomatic lung cancer screening participants and its association with downstream care and social determinants of health (SDoH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective New York City health-system study, LDCT reports of lung cancer screening enrollees with baseline LDCT (2015-2022) were reviewed for emphysema and CAC. Cardiopulmonary care within 12 months was compared using McNemar's χ<sup>2</sup> test. Newly received care was compared between participants with and without CAC and emphysema using χ<sup>2</sup> or Fisher exact tests. Associations with demographic and area-level characteristics were assessed using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2,361 participants (median age, 64; 52% male), emphysema was identified in 76.7% and CAC in 65.1%. Post-LDCT, pulmonary care increased from 24.4% to 45.8% and cardiovascular care from 42.6% to 63.3% (P < .001). Lower ZIP-level median household income (adjusted odds ratio, 1.57 [95% confidence interval, 1.22-2.02]) and greater food insecurity (1.52 [1.20-1.94]) were associated with higher odds of emphysema (both P < .001); no SDoH was associated with CAC. Among those with emphysema, high-poverty ZIP residence (1.74 [1.25-2.42], P < .001) was associated with higher odds of post-LDCT pulmonary care; among those with CAC, lower ZIP-level educational attainment (0.76 [0.60-0.98]; P = .033) was associated with lower odds of post-LDCT cardiovascular care.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Emphysema and CAC are highly prevalent and associated with increased post-LDCT cardiopulmonary care; however, future studies are needed to determine whether increased utilization improves clinical outcomes. SDoH were associated with emphysema burden and patterns of post-LDCT care, underscoring the need for equitable care pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":73968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2026.09.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Examine the prevalence of low-dose CT (LDCT) biomarkers for cardiovascular disease (coronary artery calcium [CAC]) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (emphysema) in asymptomatic lung cancer screening participants and its association with downstream care and social determinants of health (SDoH).

Methods: In this retrospective New York City health-system study, LDCT reports of lung cancer screening enrollees with baseline LDCT (2015-2022) were reviewed for emphysema and CAC. Cardiopulmonary care within 12 months was compared using McNemar's χ2 test. Newly received care was compared between participants with and without CAC and emphysema using χ2 or Fisher exact tests. Associations with demographic and area-level characteristics were assessed using logistic regression.

Results: Among 2,361 participants (median age, 64; 52% male), emphysema was identified in 76.7% and CAC in 65.1%. Post-LDCT, pulmonary care increased from 24.4% to 45.8% and cardiovascular care from 42.6% to 63.3% (P < .001). Lower ZIP-level median household income (adjusted odds ratio, 1.57 [95% confidence interval, 1.22-2.02]) and greater food insecurity (1.52 [1.20-1.94]) were associated with higher odds of emphysema (both P < .001); no SDoH was associated with CAC. Among those with emphysema, high-poverty ZIP residence (1.74 [1.25-2.42], P < .001) was associated with higher odds of post-LDCT pulmonary care; among those with CAC, lower ZIP-level educational attainment (0.76 [0.60-0.98]; P = .033) was associated with lower odds of post-LDCT cardiovascular care.

Discussion: Emphysema and CAC are highly prevalent and associated with increased post-LDCT cardiopulmonary care; however, future studies are needed to determine whether increased utilization improves clinical outcomes. SDoH were associated with emphysema burden and patterns of post-LDCT care, underscoring the need for equitable care pathways.

心血管和慢性阻塞性肺疾病生物标志物的机会性筛查及其对下游护理的影响:一项回顾性肺癌筛查队列研究
目的:探讨无症状肺癌筛查(LCS)参与者中心血管疾病(CVD)(冠状动脉钙[CAC])和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(肺气肿)的低剂量CT (LDCT)生物标志物的患病率及其与下游护理和健康社会决定因素(SDoH)的关系。方法:在这项回顾性纽约市卫生系统研究中,回顾了LCS入组者基线LDCT(2015-2022)的LDCT报告,以检查肺气肿和CAC。采用McNemar卡方检验比较12个月内的心肺护理情况。使用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验比较有和没有CAC和肺气肿的参与者之间新接受的护理。使用逻辑回归评估与人口统计学和区域水平特征的关联。结果:在2361名参与者(中位年龄64岁,52%为男性)中,肺气肿占76.7%,CAC占65.1%。ldct后,肺部护理从24.4%增加到45.8%,心血管护理从42.6%增加到63.3%(讨论:肺气肿和CAC非常普遍,并与ldct后心肺护理增加相关;然而,需要进一步的研究来确定增加的利用率是否能改善临床结果。SDoH与肺气肿负担和ldct后护理模式相关,强调了公平护理途径的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书