Deep Generative and Graph-Based Representation Learning for Multiomics Survival Stratification in Ovarian Cancer: Secondary Analysis.

Carlos Marino, Claudia Diaz Paz
{"title":"Deep Generative and Graph-Based Representation Learning for Multiomics Survival Stratification in Ovarian Cancer: Secondary Analysis.","authors":"Carlos Marino, Claudia Diaz Paz","doi":"10.2196/89069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ovarian cancer remains one of the most lethal gynecologic malignancies, largely due to pronounced molecular heterogeneity, nonspecific clinical presentation, and frequent diagnosis at advanced stages. Multiomics profiling-including genomics, transcriptomics, and epigenomics-offers a powerful avenue for characterizing this complexity and enabling more precise patient stratification.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to address key challenges in multiomics analysis, including high dimensionality, cross-modality heterogeneity, limited sample size, and the lack of effective approaches for survival stratification of patients with ovarian cancer through deep representation learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed multiomics data from The Cancer Genome Atlas and developed a 5-stage deep learning pipeline centered on variational autoencoders (VAEs) for nonlinear dimensionality reduction and latent representation learning. A graph convolutional neural network component is described as a proposed extension for modeling interaction-aware representations but was not empirically evaluated in this study. Latent embeddings derived from the VAE were clustered using k-means, and their prognostic relevance was assessed using Cox proportional hazards modeling and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following correction of a clinical-molecular harmonization issue, the final matched cohort comprised 291 patients. Silhouette analysis identified k=2 as the optimal clustering solution (silhouette=0.272). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significantly different overall survival between the two clusters (log-rank <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup><sub>1</sub>=10.0; <i>P</i>=.002). Cox proportional hazards modeling estimated a hazard ratio of 0.519 (95% CI 0.343-0.785; <i>P</i>=.002), indicating that patients assigned to cluster 1 exhibited an approximately 48% lower hazard of death than those in cluster 0. These results demonstrate that the learned latent representations capture prognostically relevant structure within the integrated multiomics data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed VAE-based framework identified 2 prognostically distinct patient subgroups with significantly different overall survival. These findings demonstrate the potential of deep generative representation learning for multiomics-based survival stratification in ovarian cancer and provide a foundation for future validation in independent cohorts and the evaluation of graph-based extensions.</p>","PeriodicalId":73552,"journal":{"name":"JMIR bioinformatics and biotechnology","volume":"7 ","pages":"e89069"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13592661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR bioinformatics and biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/89069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ovarian cancer remains one of the most lethal gynecologic malignancies, largely due to pronounced molecular heterogeneity, nonspecific clinical presentation, and frequent diagnosis at advanced stages. Multiomics profiling-including genomics, transcriptomics, and epigenomics-offers a powerful avenue for characterizing this complexity and enabling more precise patient stratification.

Objective: This study aimed to address key challenges in multiomics analysis, including high dimensionality, cross-modality heterogeneity, limited sample size, and the lack of effective approaches for survival stratification of patients with ovarian cancer through deep representation learning.

Methods: We analyzed multiomics data from The Cancer Genome Atlas and developed a 5-stage deep learning pipeline centered on variational autoencoders (VAEs) for nonlinear dimensionality reduction and latent representation learning. A graph convolutional neural network component is described as a proposed extension for modeling interaction-aware representations but was not empirically evaluated in this study. Latent embeddings derived from the VAE were clustered using k-means, and their prognostic relevance was assessed using Cox proportional hazards modeling and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

Results: Following correction of a clinical-molecular harmonization issue, the final matched cohort comprised 291 patients. Silhouette analysis identified k=2 as the optimal clustering solution (silhouette=0.272). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significantly different overall survival between the two clusters (log-rank χ21=10.0; P=.002). Cox proportional hazards modeling estimated a hazard ratio of 0.519 (95% CI 0.343-0.785; P=.002), indicating that patients assigned to cluster 1 exhibited an approximately 48% lower hazard of death than those in cluster 0. These results demonstrate that the learned latent representations capture prognostically relevant structure within the integrated multiomics data.

Conclusions: The proposed VAE-based framework identified 2 prognostically distinct patient subgroups with significantly different overall survival. These findings demonstrate the potential of deep generative representation learning for multiomics-based survival stratification in ovarian cancer and provide a foundation for future validation in independent cohorts and the evaluation of graph-based extensions.

卵巢癌多组生存分层的深度生成和基于图的表示学习:二次分析。
背景:卵巢癌仍然是最致命的妇科恶性肿瘤之一,很大程度上是由于明显的分子异质性,非特异性临床表现和频繁的晚期诊断。多组学分析——包括基因组学、转录组学和表观基因组学——为描述这种复杂性和实现更精确的患者分层提供了强有力的途径。目的:本研究旨在通过深度表征学习解决多组学分析的主要挑战,包括高维度、跨模态异质性、有限的样本量以及缺乏有效的卵巢癌患者生存分层方法。方法:我们分析了来自癌症基因组图谱的多组学数据,并开发了一个以变分自编码器(VAEs)为中心的5阶段深度学习管道,用于非线性降维和潜在表征学习。图卷积神经网络组件被描述为建模交互感知表示的提议扩展,但在本研究中没有进行经验评估。使用k-means对来自VAE的潜在嵌入进行聚类,并使用Cox比例风险模型和Kaplan-Meier生存分析评估其预后相关性。结果:在纠正了临床-分子协调问题后,最终匹配的队列包括291例患者。剪影分析确定k=2为最优聚类解(剪影=0.272)。Kaplan-Meier分析显示两组患者的总生存率有显著差异(log-rank χ21=10.0; P= 0.002)。Cox比例风险模型估计的风险比为0.519 (95% CI 0.343-0.785; P= 0.002),表明分配到聚类1的患者的死亡风险比聚类0的患者低约48%。这些结果表明,学习的潜在表征捕获了集成多组学数据中的预测相关结构。结论:提出的基于vae的框架确定了2个预后不同的患者亚组,总生存率显著不同。这些发现证明了深度生成表示学习在卵巢癌多组学生存分层中的潜力,并为未来在独立队列中的验证和基于图的扩展的评估提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书