[Friction-assisted screw fixation after reorienting pelvic osteotomies : Current evidence and clinical implications].

IF 0.5
Jens Richter, André Zahedi, Daniel Ciric, Ivan Zderic, Christian Lüring, Jens-Peter Stahl, Boyko Gueorguiev
{"title":"[Friction-assisted screw fixation after reorienting pelvic osteotomies : Current evidence and clinical implications].","authors":"Jens Richter, André Zahedi, Daniel Ciric, Ivan Zderic, Christian Lüring, Jens-Peter Stahl, Boyko Gueorguiev","doi":"10.1007/s00132-026-04887-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Internal fixation of the reoriented acetabular fragment is essential to maintain correction until osseous union. However, the underlying biomechanical principles of fixation stability remain insufficiently understood.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To summarize the biomechanical evidence on fragment fixation following reorienting pelvic osteotomies and to derive clinically relevant fixation principles.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The results of a previously published biomechanical study using 12 synthetic hemipelvis models after triple pelvic osteotomy were combined with a structured literature review. A bidirectional construct with two axial screws and one transverse screw (group 1) was compared with a monoaxial construct using three long iliac screws (group 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found between the two fixation concepts. Construct stiffness in group 1 and in group 2 was 56.5 ± 17.8 and 41.2 ± 9.5 N/mm, respectively, and corresponding failure loads were 255.3 ± 40.7 and 255.6 ± 61.7 N. Medialization and changes in acetabular anteversion and inclination increased significantly in both groups during progressively increasing cyclic loading, without significant differences between them at the assessed time points. Six additional biomechanical studies showed substantial methodological heterogeneity. Recurrent determinants of stability were osteotomy geometry, fragment contact, spatial screw distribution, and intraosseous anchorage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Iliac screw fixation can be understood as a friction-assisted intraosseous interlocking construct. Long screws with favorable spatial distribution are more relevant than the isolated orientation of a single screw. In triple pelvic osteotomy, additional anterior fixation across the pubic osteotomy may further improve stability. Partial weight-bearing until radiographic consolidation and strict nicotine abstinence remain essential components of postoperative management.</p>","PeriodicalId":74375,"journal":{"name":"Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-026-04887-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Internal fixation of the reoriented acetabular fragment is essential to maintain correction until osseous union. However, the underlying biomechanical principles of fixation stability remain insufficiently understood.

Objectives: To summarize the biomechanical evidence on fragment fixation following reorienting pelvic osteotomies and to derive clinically relevant fixation principles.

Materials and methods: The results of a previously published biomechanical study using 12 synthetic hemipelvis models after triple pelvic osteotomy were combined with a structured literature review. A bidirectional construct with two axial screws and one transverse screw (group 1) was compared with a monoaxial construct using three long iliac screws (group 2).

Results: No significant differences were found between the two fixation concepts. Construct stiffness in group 1 and in group 2 was 56.5 ± 17.8 and 41.2 ± 9.5 N/mm, respectively, and corresponding failure loads were 255.3 ± 40.7 and 255.6 ± 61.7 N. Medialization and changes in acetabular anteversion and inclination increased significantly in both groups during progressively increasing cyclic loading, without significant differences between them at the assessed time points. Six additional biomechanical studies showed substantial methodological heterogeneity. Recurrent determinants of stability were osteotomy geometry, fragment contact, spatial screw distribution, and intraosseous anchorage.

Conclusions: Iliac screw fixation can be understood as a friction-assisted intraosseous interlocking construct. Long screws with favorable spatial distribution are more relevant than the isolated orientation of a single screw. In triple pelvic osteotomy, additional anterior fixation across the pubic osteotomy may further improve stability. Partial weight-bearing until radiographic consolidation and strict nicotine abstinence remain essential components of postoperative management.

[骨盆截骨复位后的摩擦辅助螺钉固定:目前的证据和临床意义]。
背景:复位髋臼碎片的内固定对于维持矫正直到骨愈合至关重要。然而,固定稳定性的潜在生物力学原理仍然没有得到充分的了解。目的:总结骨盆再定向截骨术后碎片固定的生物力学证据,并得出临床相关的固定原则。材料和方法:将先前发表的一项生物力学研究结果与结构化文献综述相结合,该研究使用12个合成半骨盆模型进行三段式骨盆截骨。采用两根轴向螺钉和一根横向螺钉的双向支架(组1)与采用三根长髂螺钉的单轴支架(组2)进行比较。结果:两种固定观念无显著差异。组1和组2的结构刚度分别为56.5 ±17.8和41.2 ±9.5 N/mm,相应的破坏荷载分别为255.3 ±40.7和255.6 ±61.7 N。在逐渐增加的循环负荷中,两组髋臼前倾和倾斜的中间化和变化显著增加,在评估的时间点上两者之间没有显著差异。另外六项生物力学研究显示了大量的方法异质性。稳定性的反复决定因素是截骨几何、碎片接触、螺钉空间分布和骨内锚固。结论:髂螺钉固定可以理解为一种摩擦辅助的骨内联锁结构。具有良好空间分布的长螺钉比单个螺钉的孤立方向更相关。在三段式骨盆截骨术中,通过耻骨截骨进行额外的前路固定可以进一步提高稳定性。部分负重直到x线片巩固和严格的尼古丁戒断仍然是术后管理的重要组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书