Safety and tolerability study of clonidine for sedation in mechanically ventilated adult patients.

IF 4.1
Huub L A van den Oever, Marieke Zeeman, Eline Klaas, Polina Nassikovker, Carmen Bles, Arthur R de Meijer, Arriette Kruisdijk-Gerritsen, Maurits E Arbouw
{"title":"Safety and tolerability study of clonidine for sedation in mechanically ventilated adult patients.","authors":"Huub L A van den Oever, Marieke Zeeman, Eline Klaas, Polina Nassikovker, Carmen Bles, Arthur R de Meijer, Arriette Kruisdijk-Gerritsen, Maurits E Arbouw","doi":"10.1186/s44158-026-00447-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clonidine is used as an adjunct sedative in mechanically ventilated ICU patients, but prospective data on the safety and tolerability of higher intravenous doses remain limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This secondary analysis used data from a prospective pharmacokinetic study in 32 critically ill adults. Patients were consecutively enrolled into four dose groups (0, 600, 1200 or 1800 μg/day, 8 per group) and received continuous intravenous clonidine added to standard sedation for up to seven days. Half of the patients in the clonidine groups underwent a four-hour loading phase during which the infusion rate was tripled. Serious adverse events (SAEs), a predefined set of adverse events (AEs), and outcome parameters were recorded. The relatedness of SAEs to clonidine was assessed using the WHO-UMC causality classification system. Patients were monitored for 48 h after clonidine discontinuation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten SAEs were reported (3, 3, 3 and 1 in the 0, 600, 1200 and 1800 μg/day dose groups, respectively; Bayes factor (BF) 0.23). Seven SAEs were considered unrelated to clonidine, while three were judged possibly related. No SAEs occurred during the loading phase. No dose-dependent relationship was observed between clonidine dose and bradycardia or hypotension (BF 0.39 and 0.40, respectively). Pleural effusions were more frequent in the control group than in the clonidine groups (BF 12.9). Days on sedation, duration of mechanical ventilation, days in ICU and hospital mortality did not differ between groups. No clinically meaningful tachycardia or hypertension suggestive of clonidine withdrawal was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clonidine was well tolerated within the studied dose range when used as an adjunct to standard sedation in our cohort of non-bradycardic, mechanically ventilated, critically ill adults. No clear dose-dependent increase in predefined adverse events was observed within the studied dose range. These findings provide support for further prospective evaluation of clonidine at doses up to 1800 µg/day in future efficacy studies.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02466373.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13595671/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-026-00447-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clonidine is used as an adjunct sedative in mechanically ventilated ICU patients, but prospective data on the safety and tolerability of higher intravenous doses remain limited.

Methods: This secondary analysis used data from a prospective pharmacokinetic study in 32 critically ill adults. Patients were consecutively enrolled into four dose groups (0, 600, 1200 or 1800 μg/day, 8 per group) and received continuous intravenous clonidine added to standard sedation for up to seven days. Half of the patients in the clonidine groups underwent a four-hour loading phase during which the infusion rate was tripled. Serious adverse events (SAEs), a predefined set of adverse events (AEs), and outcome parameters were recorded. The relatedness of SAEs to clonidine was assessed using the WHO-UMC causality classification system. Patients were monitored for 48 h after clonidine discontinuation.

Results: Ten SAEs were reported (3, 3, 3 and 1 in the 0, 600, 1200 and 1800 μg/day dose groups, respectively; Bayes factor (BF) 0.23). Seven SAEs were considered unrelated to clonidine, while three were judged possibly related. No SAEs occurred during the loading phase. No dose-dependent relationship was observed between clonidine dose and bradycardia or hypotension (BF 0.39 and 0.40, respectively). Pleural effusions were more frequent in the control group than in the clonidine groups (BF 12.9). Days on sedation, duration of mechanical ventilation, days in ICU and hospital mortality did not differ between groups. No clinically meaningful tachycardia or hypertension suggestive of clonidine withdrawal was observed.

Conclusion: Clonidine was well tolerated within the studied dose range when used as an adjunct to standard sedation in our cohort of non-bradycardic, mechanically ventilated, critically ill adults. No clear dose-dependent increase in predefined adverse events was observed within the studied dose range. These findings provide support for further prospective evaluation of clonidine at doses up to 1800 µg/day in future efficacy studies.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02466373.

可乐定用于成人机械通气患者镇静的安全性和耐受性研究。
背景:可乐定被用作机械通气ICU患者的辅助镇静剂,但高静脉注射剂量的安全性和耐受性的前瞻性数据仍然有限。方法:这项二级分析使用了32名危重成人的前瞻性药代动力学研究数据。将患者连续分为4个剂量组(0、600、1200、1800 μg/d,每组8例),在标准镇静的基础上,连续静脉注射可乐定7天。可乐定组中一半的患者经历了4小时的负荷阶段,在此期间,输注速度增加了两倍。记录严重不良事件(sae)、一组预定义的不良事件(ae)和结局参数。使用WHO-UMC因果分类系统评估SAEs与可乐定的相关性。停用可乐定后监测患者48小时。结果:0、600、1200、1800 μg/d剂量组出现10例不良反应,分别为3、3、3、1例,贝叶斯因子(BF) 0.23。其中7例被认为与可乐定无关,3例被认为可能与可乐定有关。加载阶段未发生sae。可乐定剂量与心动过缓或低血压无剂量依赖关系(BF分别为0.39和0.40)。对照组胸膜积液发生率高于可乐定组(BF 12.9)。镇静天数、机械通气时间、ICU天数和住院死亡率组间无差异。没有观察到有临床意义的心动过速或高血压提示可乐定戒断。结论:在我们的非心动过缓、机械通气的危重成人队列中,可乐定作为标准镇静的辅助用药,在研究剂量范围内耐受性良好。在研究的剂量范围内,未观察到预定义不良事件的明显剂量依赖性增加。这些发现为在未来的疗效研究中对剂量高达1800微克/天的可乐定进行进一步的前瞻性评估提供了支持。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02466373。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书