Cannabis assessment in oncology patients-evaluation survey: understanding usage patterns in a rural radiation cohort in Kentucky.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Oncologist Pub Date : 2026-10-07 DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyag370
Evans Amoah, Waleed F Mourad, Marcus E Randall, Eddy S Yang, Brent J Shelton, Aradhana Kaushal
{"title":"Cannabis assessment in oncology patients-evaluation survey: understanding usage patterns in a rural radiation cohort in Kentucky.","authors":"Evans Amoah, Waleed F Mourad, Marcus E Randall, Eddy S Yang, Brent J Shelton, Aradhana Kaushal","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyag370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research on self-administration of unprescribed cannabis remains limited because of its evolving legal status in the United States. We conducted, to our knowledge, the first fully independent tablet application-executed oncology survey without research staff oversight in urban and rural radiation oncology practices. Objectives were to: (1) characterize symptoms motivating cannabis use, (2) compare urban and rural patterns of use, (3) assess concomitant use with opioids and gabapentin in an opioid-endemic region, and (4) evaluate associations with patient-reported quality of life.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An IRB-approved, de-identified survey was administered to 237 adults receiving radiation therapy between July 2023 and February 2024, from an urban practice and a rural satellite of an NCI/NCCN-designated cancer center. The survey assessed demographics, symptoms, quality of life, financial toxicity, and cannabis procurement. McNemar's test compared cannabis use before vs after cancer diagnosis; Fisher's exact and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests evaluated associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 237 participants, 121 (51%) reported lifetime unprescribed medicinal cannabis use. Recent use after cancer diagnosis was reported by 35 patients (14.7%) vs 30 (12.7%) before diagnosis (P = 0.0625). Users most commonly reported cannabis for pain, nausea, anxiety, depression, poor appetite, and sleep disturbance; at least 80% reported symptom and quality-of-life improvement. Recent users were more likely to reside in urban than rural areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Self-administration of unprescribed medicinal cannabis use was common across demographic groups and was primarily directed toward symptom management. This study demonstrates the feasibility of fully tablet-based research in rural oncology populations and provides novel data from an opioid-endemic region.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyag370","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Research on self-administration of unprescribed cannabis remains limited because of its evolving legal status in the United States. We conducted, to our knowledge, the first fully independent tablet application-executed oncology survey without research staff oversight in urban and rural radiation oncology practices. Objectives were to: (1) characterize symptoms motivating cannabis use, (2) compare urban and rural patterns of use, (3) assess concomitant use with opioids and gabapentin in an opioid-endemic region, and (4) evaluate associations with patient-reported quality of life.

Materials and methods: An IRB-approved, de-identified survey was administered to 237 adults receiving radiation therapy between July 2023 and February 2024, from an urban practice and a rural satellite of an NCI/NCCN-designated cancer center. The survey assessed demographics, symptoms, quality of life, financial toxicity, and cannabis procurement. McNemar's test compared cannabis use before vs after cancer diagnosis; Fisher's exact and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests evaluated associations.

Results: Of 237 participants, 121 (51%) reported lifetime unprescribed medicinal cannabis use. Recent use after cancer diagnosis was reported by 35 patients (14.7%) vs 30 (12.7%) before diagnosis (P = 0.0625). Users most commonly reported cannabis for pain, nausea, anxiety, depression, poor appetite, and sleep disturbance; at least 80% reported symptom and quality-of-life improvement. Recent users were more likely to reside in urban than rural areas.

Conclusion: Self-administration of unprescribed medicinal cannabis use was common across demographic groups and was primarily directed toward symptom management. This study demonstrates the feasibility of fully tablet-based research in rural oncology populations and provides novel data from an opioid-endemic region.

肿瘤患者的大麻评估-评估调查:了解肯塔基州农村放射队列的使用模式。
背景:由于非处方大麻在美国的法律地位不断演变,对其自我管理的研究仍然有限。据我们所知,在没有研究人员监督的情况下,我们在城市和农村放射肿瘤学实践中进行了第一次完全独立的平板应用程序执行的肿瘤学调查。目的是:(1)表征促使大麻使用的症状,(2)比较城市和农村的使用模式,(3)评估阿片类药物和加巴喷丁在阿片类药物流行地区的同时使用,以及(4)评估与患者报告的生活质量的关联。材料/方法:在2023年7月至2024年2月期间,对来自NCI/ nccn指定癌症中心的城市实践和农村卫星中心的237名接受放射治疗的成年人进行了irb批准的去识别调查。该调查评估了人口统计、症状、生活质量、财务毒性和大麻采购。McNemar的测试比较了癌症诊断前后的大麻使用情况;Fisher的精确检验和Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel检验评估了这种关联。结果:在237名参与者中,121名(51%)报告终生使用非处方药用大麻。35名患者(14.7%)报告了癌症诊断后的近期使用,而30名患者(12.7%)报告了诊断前的近期使用(p = 0.0625)。吸食大麻最常见的症状是疼痛、恶心、焦虑、抑郁、食欲不振和睡眠障碍;至少80%的患者报告症状和生活质量有所改善。最近的用户更有可能居住在城市而不是农村地区。结论:非处方药用大麻使用的自我管理在人口统计学群体中很常见,主要针对症状管理。这项研究证明了在农村肿瘤人群中进行完全基于片剂的研究的可行性,并提供了来自阿片类药物流行地区的新数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncologist
Oncologist 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
309
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书