Age, resilience, social support, and health literacy as predictors of functional ability in people with spinal cord injury: a 6-month follow-up study.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Shumei Li, Xiaoping Su, Jiawen Wang, Xiangxiang Tang
{"title":"Age, resilience, social support, and health literacy as predictors of functional ability in people with spinal cord injury: a 6-month follow-up study.","authors":"Shumei Li, Xiaoping Su, Jiawen Wang, Xiangxiang Tang","doi":"10.2340/jrm.v58.45268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To longitudinally examine age, resilience, social support, and health literacy as predictors of functional ability in people with spinal cord injury from rehabilitation initiation through to 6-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Follow-up study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The spinal surgery department of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, China.</p><p><strong>Subjects/patients: </strong>This study included 367 inpatients with traumatic spinal cord injury at a single centre.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Functional ability (Modified Barthel Index, MBI), resilience (Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale), social support (Social Support Rating Scale), and health literacy (Brief Health Literacy Screening) were assessed at baseline, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up. Linear mixed-effects models analysed predictors of MBI change.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MBI scores improved slightly from baseline to 6-month follow-up (43.50 [21.48] to 46.81 [22.10]), indicating a modest magnitude of change. Multivariate analysis identified younger age (β = -0.02; p = 0.028), higher resilience (β = 0.22; p < 0.001), and higher health literacy (β = 0.32; p = 0.001) as significant independent predictors of greater functional ability over time. Social support was significant only in univariate analysis (β = 0.44; p = 0.038).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the observed improvement in functional ability was modest, younger age, stronger psychological resilience, and higher health literacy were independent predictors of better functional ability in the first 6 months after discharge from spinal cord injury. Further research is warranted to determine the clinical significance of these changes. Rehabilitation strategies may consider integrating interventions targeting these modifiable psychosocial and cognitive resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":54768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":"58 ","pages":"jrm45268"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v58.45268","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To longitudinally examine age, resilience, social support, and health literacy as predictors of functional ability in people with spinal cord injury from rehabilitation initiation through to 6-month follow-up.

Design: Follow-up study.

Setting: The spinal surgery department of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, China.

Subjects/patients: This study included 367 inpatients with traumatic spinal cord injury at a single centre.

Methods: Functional ability (Modified Barthel Index, MBI), resilience (Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale), social support (Social Support Rating Scale), and health literacy (Brief Health Literacy Screening) were assessed at baseline, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up. Linear mixed-effects models analysed predictors of MBI change.

Results: MBI scores improved slightly from baseline to 6-month follow-up (43.50 [21.48] to 46.81 [22.10]), indicating a modest magnitude of change. Multivariate analysis identified younger age (β = -0.02; p = 0.028), higher resilience (β = 0.22; p < 0.001), and higher health literacy (β = 0.32; p = 0.001) as significant independent predictors of greater functional ability over time. Social support was significant only in univariate analysis (β = 0.44; p = 0.038).

Conclusions: Although the observed improvement in functional ability was modest, younger age, stronger psychological resilience, and higher health literacy were independent predictors of better functional ability in the first 6 months after discharge from spinal cord injury. Further research is warranted to determine the clinical significance of these changes. Rehabilitation strategies may consider integrating interventions targeting these modifiable psychosocial and cognitive resources.

年龄、恢复力、社会支持和健康素养作为脊髓损伤患者功能能力的预测因素:一项为期6个月的随访研究
目的:纵向检验年龄、恢复力、社会支持和健康素养作为脊髓损伤患者从康复开始到6个月随访期间功能能力的预测因子。设计:随访研究。单位:中国苏州大学第三附属医院脊柱外科。受试者/患者:本研究包括367例创伤性脊髓损伤住院患者。方法:在基线、3个月和6个月的随访中评估功能能力(改良Barthel指数,MBI)、心理弹性(康纳-戴维森心理弹性量表)、社会支持(社会支持评定量表)和健康素养(简短健康素养筛查)。线性混合效应模型分析了MBI变化的预测因子。结果:从基线到6个月的随访,MBI评分略有改善(43.50[21.48]至46.81[22.10]),表明变化幅度不大。多因素分析发现,年龄越小(β = -0.02; p = 0.028)、恢复力越强(β = 0.22; p)。结论:虽然观察到的功能能力改善程度不高,但年龄越小、心理恢复力越强和健康素质越高是脊髓损伤出院后前6个月功能能力改善的独立预测因素。需要进一步的研究来确定这些变化的临床意义。康复策略可以考虑针对这些可改变的社会心理和认知资源进行综合干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
102
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine is an international peer-review journal published in English, with at least 10 issues published per year. Original articles, reviews, case reports, short communications, special reports and letters to the editor are published, as also are editorials and book reviews. The journal strives to provide its readers with a variety of topics, including: functional assessment and intervention studies, clinical studies in various patient groups, methodology in physical and rehabilitation medicine, epidemiological studies on disabling conditions and reports on vocational and sociomedical aspects of rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书