Non-Battle Injury in Military Operations Novel Treatment for Soft Tissue Injury and Infection with Logistics Implications.

Q3 Medicine
J Rick Hammesfahr
{"title":"Non-Battle Injury in Military Operations Novel Treatment for Soft Tissue Injury and Infection with Logistics Implications.","authors":"J Rick Hammesfahr","doi":"10.55460/J.Spec.Oper.Med.2026.M1XC-G0IV","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-battle injuries (NBIs) represent a substantial proportion of morbidity during military deployments, often exceeding combat-related injuries in frequency. NBIs, including superficial wounds, burns, blisters, and soft tissue infections, remain a significant source of lost duty time and operational disruption in deployed military populations. In austere environments with limited medical support, even minor injuries often progress to cellulitis or abscess, which require substantial logistical resources including irrigation fluids, medical dressings, and antibiotics, impairing operational readiness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review synthesizes epidemiologic data, clinical outcomes, and logistical considerations from surveillance reports, peer-reviewed publications and Department of War guidelines. Rates of wound progression, hospitalization, and duty loss were analyzed alongside logistics modeling based on U.S. Army Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Evidence indicates that 15%-20% of untreated superficial wounds develop infection, 3%-7% progress to cellulitis or abscess, and 1%-2% require hospitalization. Blister-related cellulitis contributes significantly to lost duty time, with up to 120-150 duty days lost per 100 infections. Standard CPG-based wound care requires multiple liters of irrigation fluid, frequent dressing changes, and systemic antibiotics. Novel products such as Field Shield™ Wound Dressing and KeriCleanz™ Antiseptic that are optimized for ease of use and multiple applications per product show potential to reduce infection rates and resupply burdens, decreasing fluid and dressing requirements while conserving antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early recognition and aggressive management of superficial wounds and preventative measures for managing minor injuries such as blisters and skin infections are essential for both clinical recovery and sustaining combat effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":53630,"journal":{"name":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","volume":" ","pages":"93-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55460/J.Spec.Oper.Med.2026.M1XC-G0IV","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Non-battle injuries (NBIs) represent a substantial proportion of morbidity during military deployments, often exceeding combat-related injuries in frequency. NBIs, including superficial wounds, burns, blisters, and soft tissue infections, remain a significant source of lost duty time and operational disruption in deployed military populations. In austere environments with limited medical support, even minor injuries often progress to cellulitis or abscess, which require substantial logistical resources including irrigation fluids, medical dressings, and antibiotics, impairing operational readiness.

Methods: This review synthesizes epidemiologic data, clinical outcomes, and logistical considerations from surveillance reports, peer-reviewed publications and Department of War guidelines. Rates of wound progression, hospitalization, and duty loss were analyzed alongside logistics modeling based on U.S. Army Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs).

Results: Evidence indicates that 15%-20% of untreated superficial wounds develop infection, 3%-7% progress to cellulitis or abscess, and 1%-2% require hospitalization. Blister-related cellulitis contributes significantly to lost duty time, with up to 120-150 duty days lost per 100 infections. Standard CPG-based wound care requires multiple liters of irrigation fluid, frequent dressing changes, and systemic antibiotics. Novel products such as Field Shield™ Wound Dressing and KeriCleanz™ Antiseptic that are optimized for ease of use and multiple applications per product show potential to reduce infection rates and resupply burdens, decreasing fluid and dressing requirements while conserving antibiotics.

Conclusion: Early recognition and aggressive management of superficial wounds and preventative measures for managing minor injuries such as blisters and skin infections are essential for both clinical recovery and sustaining combat effectiveness.

军事行动中的非战斗损伤:软组织损伤和感染的新治疗方法及其后勤意义。
背景:非战斗伤害(nbi)在军事部署期间的发病率中占相当大的比例,其频率往往超过战斗相关伤害。非外伤,包括浅表伤口、烧伤、水疱和软组织感染,仍然是现役军人损失执勤时间和行动中断的重要原因。在医疗支持有限的恶劣环境中,即使是轻微的伤害也经常发展为蜂窝织炎或脓肿,这需要大量的后勤资源,包括冲洗液、医用敷料和抗生素,从而削弱了作战准备。方法:本综述综合了来自监测报告、同行评议出版物和陆军部指南的流行病学数据、临床结果和后勤考虑。根据美国陆军临床实践指南(CPGs)的物流模型,分析了伤口进展率、住院率和工作损失。结果:有证据表明,15%-20%未经治疗的浅表伤口发生感染,3%-7%进展为蜂窝织炎或脓肿,1%-2%需要住院治疗。水泡相关蜂窝织炎显著减少了工作时间,每100例感染可减少120-150个工作天。标准的cpg伤口护理需要多升冲洗液,频繁更换敷料和全身抗生素。新型产品,如Field Shield™伤口敷料和KeriCleanz™防腐剂,经过优化,易于使用,每种产品可多种应用,显示出降低感染率和再供应负担的潜力,减少液体和敷料需求,同时节省抗生素。结论:浅表创伤的早期识别和积极处理,以及对水疱和皮肤感染等轻伤的预防措施对临床恢复和维持战斗力至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书