Building meaningful relationships through co-design: reflections from a participatory multi-year research partnership to create MedManageSCI.

IF 2.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2026-09-07 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2026.1876265
Lauren Cadel, Angela Chow, Sander L Hitzig, Lisa M McCarthy, Shoshana Hahn-Goldberg, Carolen Carvalho, Emily Ching, Shannon Fiedorec, Michael Gateman, Anita Kaiser, Aaron Kowalchuk, Shveta Makim, Kiesha Mastrodimos, Holly Mo, Phillip Raney, Rasha El-Kotob, Sara J T Guilcher
{"title":"Building meaningful relationships through co-design: reflections from a participatory multi-year research partnership to create MedManageSCI.","authors":"Lauren Cadel, Angela Chow, Sander L Hitzig, Lisa M McCarthy, Shoshana Hahn-Goldberg, Carolen Carvalho, Emily Ching, Shannon Fiedorec, Michael Gateman, Anita Kaiser, Aaron Kowalchuk, Shveta Makim, Kiesha Mastrodimos, Holly Mo, Phillip Raney, Rasha El-Kotob, Sara J T Guilcher","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2026.1876265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Participatory approaches to research, including co-design, are essential to enhancing healthcare quality and safety and for minimizing the research-to-practice gap. Our team co-designed a medication self-management toolkit, MedManageSCI, to empower adults with spinal cord injury/dysfunction (SCI/D) to better integrate medications into their daily lives.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We reflect on the lessons learned through the co-development of MedManageSCI and provide practical considerations for future co-design and implementation research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A participatory multi-methods study was conducted to co-develop, implement, and evaluate MedManageSCI. A working group comprised of adults with SCI/D, caregivers, and healthcare providers guided all aspects of this research, participating in a total of 10 meetings over the three-year project. In the final meeting, a reflective discussion was facilitated to identify key insights, practical strategies, and future considerations for engaging a diverse group of individuals in a multi-year, participatory research process. The audio-recording and notes from this session were analyzed independently and with the working group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The working group consisted of nine adults with SCI/D, nine healthcare providers (e.g., physicians, nurses, pharmacists, physical therapists, occupational therapists), and one caregiver from across Canada. We identified an overarching theme, development of meaningful relationships, which was enabled through the following three key insights: co-creating a vision and having a collaborative culture, ensuring structured and intentional engagement, and closing the loop through authentic transparency. Across the overarching theme and insights, we discuss practical strategies and future considerations to support meaningful and sustained engagement in participatory research.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By sharing our processes and key learnings, our goal is to inform and strengthen future co-design and implementation research by promoting shared and inclusive leadership, ensuring meaningful engagement, and fostering psychologically safe environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"6 ","pages":"1876265"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13591255/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2026.1876265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Participatory approaches to research, including co-design, are essential to enhancing healthcare quality and safety and for minimizing the research-to-practice gap. Our team co-designed a medication self-management toolkit, MedManageSCI, to empower adults with spinal cord injury/dysfunction (SCI/D) to better integrate medications into their daily lives.

Objective: We reflect on the lessons learned through the co-development of MedManageSCI and provide practical considerations for future co-design and implementation research.

Methods: A participatory multi-methods study was conducted to co-develop, implement, and evaluate MedManageSCI. A working group comprised of adults with SCI/D, caregivers, and healthcare providers guided all aspects of this research, participating in a total of 10 meetings over the three-year project. In the final meeting, a reflective discussion was facilitated to identify key insights, practical strategies, and future considerations for engaging a diverse group of individuals in a multi-year, participatory research process. The audio-recording and notes from this session were analyzed independently and with the working group.

Results: The working group consisted of nine adults with SCI/D, nine healthcare providers (e.g., physicians, nurses, pharmacists, physical therapists, occupational therapists), and one caregiver from across Canada. We identified an overarching theme, development of meaningful relationships, which was enabled through the following three key insights: co-creating a vision and having a collaborative culture, ensuring structured and intentional engagement, and closing the loop through authentic transparency. Across the overarching theme and insights, we discuss practical strategies and future considerations to support meaningful and sustained engagement in participatory research.

Conclusions: By sharing our processes and key learnings, our goal is to inform and strengthen future co-design and implementation research by promoting shared and inclusive leadership, ensuring meaningful engagement, and fostering psychologically safe environments.

通过共同设计建立有意义的关系:来自创建MedManageSCI的参与性多年研究伙伴关系的反思。
背景:包括共同设计在内的参与式研究方法对于提高医疗保健质量和安全性以及最小化研究与实践之间的差距至关重要。我们的团队共同设计了一个药物自我管理工具包,MedManageSCI,帮助患有脊髓损伤/功能障碍(SCI/D)的成年人更好地将药物融入他们的日常生活。目的:反思MedManageSCI协同开发的经验教训,为未来协同设计与实施研究提供实践参考。方法:采用参与式多方法研究,共同开发、实施和评估MedManageSCI。一个由SCI/D成人、护理人员和医疗保健提供者组成的工作组指导了这项研究的各个方面,在三年的项目中共参加了10次会议。在最后一次会议上,促进了一场反思性讨论,以确定在多年参与性研究过程中吸引不同群体的关键见解、实用策略和未来考虑。对本届会议的录音和笔记进行了独立分析,并与工作组一起进行了分析。结果:工作组由来自加拿大各地的9名SCI/D成年患者、9名医疗保健提供者(如医生、护士、药剂师、物理治疗师、职业治疗师)和1名护理人员组成。我们确定了一个总体主题,即发展有意义的关系,这是通过以下三个关键见解实现的:共同创造愿景并拥有协作文化,确保结构化和有意的参与,以及通过真正的透明度关闭循环。在总体主题和见解中,我们讨论了实际的策略和未来的考虑,以支持参与性研究的有意义和持续参与。结论:通过分享我们的流程和关键经验,我们的目标是通过促进共享和包容性领导、确保有意义的参与和营造心理安全环境,为未来的共同设计和实施研究提供信息和加强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书