Atenolol or Bisoprolol after Myocardial Infarction without Recorded Heart Failure.

IF 11.6
NEJM evidence Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-22 DOI:10.1056/EVIDoa2600138
Thomas Laurenceau, Ugo Meli, Louise Z Wang, Richard Chocron, Pierre Cezard, Emma Menant, Frankie Beganton, Jean-Philippe Empana, Emmanuel Bacry, Xavier Jouven
{"title":"Atenolol or Bisoprolol after Myocardial Infarction without Recorded Heart Failure.","authors":"Thomas Laurenceau, Ugo Meli, Louise Z Wang, Richard Chocron, Pierre Cezard, Emma Menant, Frankie Beganton, Jean-Philippe Empana, Emmanuel Bacry, Xavier Jouven","doi":"10.1056/EVIDoa2600138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Beta-blockers are a cornerstone of therapy following myocardial infarction. The effect of different β-blockers on the outcomes of patients without heart failure after myocardial infarction is not well-studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational cohort study used administrative data from French National Health Data System. Eligible patients were 18 years of age or older, hospitalized in the Paris area between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2018, with a new myocardial infarction, and were dispensed either atenolol or bisoprolol within 2 days of hospital discharge. Patients prescribed β-blockers or loop diuretics or with a recorded diagnosis of heart failure (based on International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes) during the 2 years preceding hospital discharge were excluded. Outcomes were followed for up to 2 years following hospital discharge and included major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiac arrest, all-cause mortality, reinfarction, stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure) (primary outcome) and all-cause mortality (secondary outcome). Targeted maximum likelihood estimation was used to estimate the average treatment effects (ATEs) comparing patients initiated on atenolol versus bisoprolol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 11,558 patients, 1523 (13.2%) initiated atenolol and 10,035 (86.8%) initiated bisoprolol within 2 days of discharge. Comparing the atenolol group to the bisoprolol group, the ATE was 2.9 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-4.7) for major adverse cardiovascular events and 0.6 percentage points (95% CI, -0.2 to 1.3) for all-cause mortality. The weighted proportions of patients experiencing major adverse cardiovascular events were 10.8% and 14.1% in the atenolol and bisoprolol groups, respectively. The weighted proportions of patients experiencing all-cause mortality were 1.4% and 2.2% in the atenolol and bisoprolol groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients without recorded characteristics in an administrative database suggesting the presence of heart failure, initiation of atenolol after myocardial infarction was associated with a lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, but not all-cause mortality, at 2 years compared with bisoprolol. (Funded by PRAIRIE and others.).</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":"5 10","pages":"EVIDoa2600138"},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEJM evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2600138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Beta-blockers are a cornerstone of therapy following myocardial infarction. The effect of different β-blockers on the outcomes of patients without heart failure after myocardial infarction is not well-studied.

Methods: This observational cohort study used administrative data from French National Health Data System. Eligible patients were 18 years of age or older, hospitalized in the Paris area between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2018, with a new myocardial infarction, and were dispensed either atenolol or bisoprolol within 2 days of hospital discharge. Patients prescribed β-blockers or loop diuretics or with a recorded diagnosis of heart failure (based on International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes) during the 2 years preceding hospital discharge were excluded. Outcomes were followed for up to 2 years following hospital discharge and included major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiac arrest, all-cause mortality, reinfarction, stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure) (primary outcome) and all-cause mortality (secondary outcome). Targeted maximum likelihood estimation was used to estimate the average treatment effects (ATEs) comparing patients initiated on atenolol versus bisoprolol.

Results: Among 11,558 patients, 1523 (13.2%) initiated atenolol and 10,035 (86.8%) initiated bisoprolol within 2 days of discharge. Comparing the atenolol group to the bisoprolol group, the ATE was 2.9 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-4.7) for major adverse cardiovascular events and 0.6 percentage points (95% CI, -0.2 to 1.3) for all-cause mortality. The weighted proportions of patients experiencing major adverse cardiovascular events were 10.8% and 14.1% in the atenolol and bisoprolol groups, respectively. The weighted proportions of patients experiencing all-cause mortality were 1.4% and 2.2% in the atenolol and bisoprolol groups, respectively.

Conclusions: Among patients without recorded characteristics in an administrative database suggesting the presence of heart failure, initiation of atenolol after myocardial infarction was associated with a lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, but not all-cause mortality, at 2 years compared with bisoprolol. (Funded by PRAIRIE and others.).

心肌梗死后无心衰记录的阿替洛尔或比索洛尔。
背景:β受体阻滞剂是心肌梗死后治疗的基础。不同β受体阻滞剂对心肌梗死后无心力衰竭患者预后的影响尚不清楚。方法:本观察性队列研究使用法国国家卫生数据系统的行政数据。符合条件的患者为2008年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间在巴黎地区住院的18岁及以上的新发心肌梗死患者,并在出院后2天内使用阿替洛尔或比索洛尔。在出院前2年内服用β受体阻滞剂或环状利尿剂或有心衰诊断记录的患者(基于国际疾病分类,第十版代码)被排除在外。出院后随访2年,包括主要不良心血管事件(心脏骤停、全因死亡率、再梗死、中风或因心力衰竭住院)(主要结局)和全因死亡率(次要结局)。目标最大似然估计用于比较阿替洛尔和比索洛尔患者的平均治疗效果(ATEs)。结果:11558例患者中,1523例(13.2%)在出院2天内开始使用阿替洛尔,10035例(86.8%)在出院2天内开始使用比索洛尔。阿替洛尔组与比索洛尔组比较,主要不良心血管事件的ATE为2.9个百分点(95%可信区间[CI], 1.1-4.7),全因死亡率的ATE为0.6个百分点(95% CI, -0.2 - 1.3)。阿替洛尔组和比索洛尔组发生重大心血管不良事件的加权比例分别为10.8%和14.1%。阿替洛尔组和比索洛尔组发生全因死亡率的加权比例分别为1.4%和2.2%。结论:与比索洛尔相比,在管理数据库中没有记录心衰特征的患者中,心肌梗死后开始使用阿替洛尔与2年主要不良心血管事件的风险较低相关,但并非全因死亡率较低。(由PRAIRIE和其他公司资助)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书