Minimum Significant Ratio for Defining Treatment-Boosted ADA Responses Using Signal-to-Noise as an Alternative to Titer.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Lili Guo, Kenneth Goldberg, Yong Jiang, Christopher Ehlinger
{"title":"Minimum Significant Ratio for Defining Treatment-Boosted ADA Responses Using Signal-to-Noise as an Alternative to Titer.","authors":"Lili Guo, Kenneth Goldberg, Yong Jiang, Christopher Ehlinger","doi":"10.1208/s12248-026-01306-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) has emerged as a practical alternative to endpoint titer for evaluating anti-drug antibody (ADA) response magnitude. When titration is not performed, a scientifically justified threshold is needed to interpret longitudinal increases in S/N, particularly for identifying treatment-boosted ADA responses in subjects with pre-existing ADA. In conventional titer-based assessments, treatment-boosted responses are typically defined by an increase of two dilution steps relative to the pre-dose titer. In the absence of titer testing, an alternative threshold is needed to determine whether a post-dose/pre-dose increase in S/N exceeds expected analytical variability. This study evaluated minimum significant ratio (MSR) as a project-specific, analytical variability-based threshold for treatment-boosted ADA response classification using S/N. Two MSR calculation approaches were assessed across 11 validated clinical ADA assays representing diverse assay formats, therapeutic modalities, and analytical platforms. MSR<sub>POS</sub> was derived from inter-assay precision data using positive controls, whereas MSR<sub>NEG</sub> was derived from ADA-negative individual samples and negative-control data generated during assay validation. Retrospective clinical ADA data from two projects were analyzed to compare longitudinal titer ratios with S/N ratios and evaluate treatment-boosted classifications using conventional titer-ratio and MSR-based S/N approaches. Longitudinal titer ratios and S/N ratios were strongly correlated, and MSR-based classifications were broadly consistent with conventional titer-ratio-based classifications. Compared with MSR<sub>POS</sub>, MSR<sub>NEG</sub> showed higher positive percent agreement while maintaining high negative and overall percent agreement. Overall, these findings support MSR as a practical, project-specific, and statistically justified analytical framework for applying S/N to longitudinal treatment-boosted ADA response characterization.</p>","PeriodicalId":50934,"journal":{"name":"AAPS Journal","volume":"28 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAPS Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-026-01306-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) has emerged as a practical alternative to endpoint titer for evaluating anti-drug antibody (ADA) response magnitude. When titration is not performed, a scientifically justified threshold is needed to interpret longitudinal increases in S/N, particularly for identifying treatment-boosted ADA responses in subjects with pre-existing ADA. In conventional titer-based assessments, treatment-boosted responses are typically defined by an increase of two dilution steps relative to the pre-dose titer. In the absence of titer testing, an alternative threshold is needed to determine whether a post-dose/pre-dose increase in S/N exceeds expected analytical variability. This study evaluated minimum significant ratio (MSR) as a project-specific, analytical variability-based threshold for treatment-boosted ADA response classification using S/N. Two MSR calculation approaches were assessed across 11 validated clinical ADA assays representing diverse assay formats, therapeutic modalities, and analytical platforms. MSRPOS was derived from inter-assay precision data using positive controls, whereas MSRNEG was derived from ADA-negative individual samples and negative-control data generated during assay validation. Retrospective clinical ADA data from two projects were analyzed to compare longitudinal titer ratios with S/N ratios and evaluate treatment-boosted classifications using conventional titer-ratio and MSR-based S/N approaches. Longitudinal titer ratios and S/N ratios were strongly correlated, and MSR-based classifications were broadly consistent with conventional titer-ratio-based classifications. Compared with MSRPOS, MSRNEG showed higher positive percent agreement while maintaining high negative and overall percent agreement. Overall, these findings support MSR as a practical, project-specific, and statistically justified analytical framework for applying S/N to longitudinal treatment-boosted ADA response characterization.

定义治疗增强ADA反应的最小显著比,使用信噪比替代滴度。
信噪比(S/N)已成为评估抗药物抗体(ADA)反应强度的终点滴度的实用替代方法。当不进行滴定时,需要一个科学合理的阈值来解释S/N的纵向增加,特别是在识别治疗增强的ADA反应时。在传统的基于滴度的评估中,治疗增强反应通常由相对于剂量前滴度增加两个稀释步骤来定义。在没有效价测试的情况下,需要一个替代阈值来确定给药后/给药前S/N的增加是否超出预期的分析变异性。本研究评估了最小显著比(MSR)作为一个项目特定的、基于分析变异性的阈值,用于使用S/N对治疗增强的ADA反应进行分类。两种MSR计算方法在11种经过验证的临床ADA分析中进行了评估,这些分析代表了不同的分析格式、治疗方式和分析平台。MSRPOS来自使用阳性对照的测定间精度数据,而MSRNEG来自ada阴性的个体样本和检测验证过程中产生的阴性对照数据。对两个项目的回顾性临床ADA数据进行分析,比较纵向滴度比和S/N比,并使用传统滴度比和基于msr的S/N方法评估治疗促进分类。纵向滴度比与S/N比具有很强的相关性,基于msr的分类与传统的基于滴度比的分类基本一致。与MSRPOS相比,MSRNEG表现出更高的正一致性,同时保持较高的负一致性和总体一致性。总的来说,这些发现支持MSR作为一种实用的、特定于项目的、统计上合理的分析框架,将S/N应用于纵向治疗促进的ADA反应表征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AAPS Journal
AAPS Journal 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.40%
发文量
109
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The AAPS Journal, an official journal of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS), publishes novel and significant findings in the various areas of pharmaceutical sciences impacting human and veterinary therapeutics, including: · Drug Design and Discovery · Pharmaceutical Biotechnology · Biopharmaceutics, Formulation, and Drug Delivery · Metabolism and Transport · Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacometrics · Translational Research · Clinical Evaluations and Therapeutic Outcomes · Regulatory Science We invite submissions under the following article types: · Original Research Articles · Reviews and Mini-reviews · White Papers, Commentaries, and Editorials · Meeting Reports · Brief/Technical Reports and Rapid Communications · Regulatory Notes · Tutorials · Protocols in the Pharmaceutical Sciences In addition, The AAPS Journal publishes themes, organized by guest editors, which are focused on particular areas of current interest to our field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书