From Course to Clinical Practice: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a Longitudinal POCUS Curriculum for Community Pediatricians.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Hadas Katz-Dana, Ayelet Shles, Ortal Erez-Granat, Hadas Yechiam, Dania Takagi, Ehud Rosenbloom, Nir Friedman
{"title":"From Course to Clinical Practice: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a Longitudinal POCUS Curriculum for Community Pediatricians.","authors":"Hadas Katz-Dana, Ayelet Shles, Ortal Erez-Granat, Hadas Yechiam, Dania Takagi, Ehud Rosenbloom, Nir Friedman","doi":"10.1016/j.acap.2026.103445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly used in emergency and adult primary care, yet its integration into pediatric community pediatrics remains limited. Barriers include limited training opportunities, insufficient hands-on practice, and inconsistent access to ultrasound devices. This study evaluated self-reported POCUS use, confidence, perceived practice impact, and barriers 12 months after completion of a longitudinal POCUS training program tailored for community pediatricians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed-methods study included 65 community pediatricians who completed a two-day introductory POCUS course followed by four supervised scanning shifts in a pediatric emergency department. Participants were required to commit to ultrasound device access prior to enrollment. Twelve months after course completion, participants completed an anonymous survey assessing POCUS use frequency, self-reported confidence across 19 applications, perceived clinical impact, and barriers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two of 65 pediatricians (80%) completed the 12-month follow-up survey. 23/52 (44%) reported using POCUS at least weekly, while 20/52 (38%) reported rare use. Lung and soft-tissue applications were most used and associated with the highest confidence. Participants reported increased diagnostic confidence (39/52, 75%), improved communication with families (41/52, 79%), and enhanced patient satisfaction (46/52, 88%). 34/52 (65%) perceived reduced reliance on chest radiography and 31/52 (59%) reported faster decision-making. Device availability was strongly associated with ongoing use. Major barriers included limited refresher training, lack of feedback on image quality, and extended visit duration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A longitudinal POCUS curriculum may support meaningful integration of POCUS into community pediatric practice. Reliable device access and ongoing supervised practice are essential for sustaining long-term adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":50930,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"103445"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2026.103445","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly used in emergency and adult primary care, yet its integration into pediatric community pediatrics remains limited. Barriers include limited training opportunities, insufficient hands-on practice, and inconsistent access to ultrasound devices. This study evaluated self-reported POCUS use, confidence, perceived practice impact, and barriers 12 months after completion of a longitudinal POCUS training program tailored for community pediatricians.

Methods: This mixed-methods study included 65 community pediatricians who completed a two-day introductory POCUS course followed by four supervised scanning shifts in a pediatric emergency department. Participants were required to commit to ultrasound device access prior to enrollment. Twelve months after course completion, participants completed an anonymous survey assessing POCUS use frequency, self-reported confidence across 19 applications, perceived clinical impact, and barriers.

Results: Fifty-two of 65 pediatricians (80%) completed the 12-month follow-up survey. 23/52 (44%) reported using POCUS at least weekly, while 20/52 (38%) reported rare use. Lung and soft-tissue applications were most used and associated with the highest confidence. Participants reported increased diagnostic confidence (39/52, 75%), improved communication with families (41/52, 79%), and enhanced patient satisfaction (46/52, 88%). 34/52 (65%) perceived reduced reliance on chest radiography and 31/52 (59%) reported faster decision-making. Device availability was strongly associated with ongoing use. Major barriers included limited refresher training, lack of feedback on image quality, and extended visit duration.

Conclusion: A longitudinal POCUS curriculum may support meaningful integration of POCUS into community pediatric practice. Reliable device access and ongoing supervised practice are essential for sustaining long-term adoption.

从课程到临床实践:社区儿科医师纵向POCUS课程的混合方法评价。
背景:点护理超声(POCUS)越来越多地用于急诊和成人初级保健,但其在儿科社区的整合仍然有限。障碍包括培训机会有限,实践实践不足,以及超声设备的不一致。本研究评估了为社区儿科医生量身定制的纵向POCUS培训计划完成12个月后,自我报告的POCUS使用情况、信心、感知的实践影响和障碍。方法:这项混合方法研究包括65名社区儿科医生,他们完成了为期两天的POCUS入门课程,随后在儿科急诊科进行了四次监督扫描。参与者被要求在入组前使用超声设备。课程结束12个月后,参与者完成了一项匿名调查,评估POCUS的使用频率、19种应用中自我报告的信心、感知的临床影响和障碍。结果:65名儿科医生中有52名(80%)完成了12个月的随访调查。23/52(44%)报告至少每周使用POCUS,而20/52(38%)报告很少使用。肺和软组织应用最多,置信度最高。参与者报告提高了诊断信心(39/ 52,75%),改善了与家人的沟通(41/ 52,79%),提高了患者满意度(46/ 52,88%)。34/52(65%)的患者认为对胸片的依赖程度降低,31/52(59%)的患者认为决策速度加快。设备可用性与持续使用密切相关。主要障碍包括有限的进修培训,缺乏对图像质量的反馈,以及延长的访问时间。结论:纵向POCUS课程可支持POCUS融入社区儿科实践。可靠的设备访问和持续的监督实践对于维持长期采用至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Pediatrics
Academic Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.90%
发文量
300
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Academic Pediatrics, the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, is a peer-reviewed publication whose purpose is to strengthen the research and educational base of academic general pediatrics. The journal provides leadership in pediatric education, research, patient care and advocacy. Content areas include pediatric education, emergency medicine, injury, abuse, behavioral pediatrics, holistic medicine, child health services and health policy,and the environment. The journal provides an active forum for the presentation of pediatric educational research in diverse settings, involving medical students, residents, fellows, and practicing professionals. The journal also emphasizes important research relating to the quality of child health care, health care policy, and the organization of child health services. It also includes systematic reviews of primary care interventions and important methodologic papers to aid research in child health and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书