Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Beyond Driver Testing in Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Known Drivers.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Cancer Science Pub Date : 2026-09-22 DOI:10.1111/cas.70538
Yoshihiro Masui, Tatsuya Yoshida, Yoh Yamaguchi, Jun Miyakoshi, Ryoko Inaba Higashiyama, Akiko Tateishi, Yuki Shinno, Yuji Matsumoto, Yusuke Okuma, Tomonori Mizutani, Hidehito Horinouchi, Kouya Shiraishi, Takashi Kohno, Takafumi Koyama, Noboru Yamamoto, Yasushi Goto
{"title":"Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Beyond Driver Testing in Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Known Drivers.","authors":"Yoshihiro Masui, Tatsuya Yoshida, Yoh Yamaguchi, Jun Miyakoshi, Ryoko Inaba Higashiyama, Akiko Tateishi, Yuki Shinno, Yuji Matsumoto, Yusuke Okuma, Tomonori Mizutani, Hidehito Horinouchi, Kouya Shiraishi, Takashi Kohno, Takafumi Koyama, Noboru Yamamoto, Yasushi Goto","doi":"10.1111/cas.70538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (non-sq NSCLC), companion diagnostic testing (CDx) identifies actionable driver alterations and guides initial targeted therapy. However, disease progression inevitably occurs through acquired resistance, including activation of bypass signaling pathways. Although comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) can identify emerging resistance alterations, its clinical utility in patients with known actionable driver alterations remains unclear. We retrospectively analyzed 227 patients who underwent CGP between June 2019 and August 2025. Patients with actionable driver alterations identified by CDx before CGP formed the known driver group. We also analyzed the nationwide C-CAT registry to assess registry-recorded therapeutic implementation. Among 227 patients, 74 (32.6%) had known actionable driver alterations. CGP identified additional clinically relevant genomic findings, including ESCAT Tier I-III or V alterations, in 34 patients (45.9%), comparable to that in patients without known actionable driver alterations (77/153, 50.3%). In the EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) subgroup, CGP frequently identified alterations consistent with potential bypass resistance mechanisms, including MET amplification, RET fusions, and BRAF V600E mutations. Overall, 10 patients (13.5%) received CGP-guided therapy based on additional findings, all within the EGFRm subgroup, whereas no patients with non-EGFR driver alterations did. In the C-CAT registry, CGP-associated therapy was documented in 21 of 381 (5.5%) in the EGFRm subgroup, 6 of 155 (3.9%) in the non-EGFR driver subgroup, and 195 of 2132 (9.1%) without registry-defined driver alterations. These findings indicate that CGP provides molecular re-evaluation during disease progression, particularly by identifying alterations consistent with potentially actionable resistance or bypass mechanisms in EGFRm NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":48943,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13596020/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.70538","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (non-sq NSCLC), companion diagnostic testing (CDx) identifies actionable driver alterations and guides initial targeted therapy. However, disease progression inevitably occurs through acquired resistance, including activation of bypass signaling pathways. Although comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) can identify emerging resistance alterations, its clinical utility in patients with known actionable driver alterations remains unclear. We retrospectively analyzed 227 patients who underwent CGP between June 2019 and August 2025. Patients with actionable driver alterations identified by CDx before CGP formed the known driver group. We also analyzed the nationwide C-CAT registry to assess registry-recorded therapeutic implementation. Among 227 patients, 74 (32.6%) had known actionable driver alterations. CGP identified additional clinically relevant genomic findings, including ESCAT Tier I-III or V alterations, in 34 patients (45.9%), comparable to that in patients without known actionable driver alterations (77/153, 50.3%). In the EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) subgroup, CGP frequently identified alterations consistent with potential bypass resistance mechanisms, including MET amplification, RET fusions, and BRAF V600E mutations. Overall, 10 patients (13.5%) received CGP-guided therapy based on additional findings, all within the EGFRm subgroup, whereas no patients with non-EGFR driver alterations did. In the C-CAT registry, CGP-associated therapy was documented in 21 of 381 (5.5%) in the EGFRm subgroup, 6 of 155 (3.9%) in the non-EGFR driver subgroup, and 195 of 2132 (9.1%) without registry-defined driver alterations. These findings indicate that CGP provides molecular re-evaluation during disease progression, particularly by identifying alterations consistent with potentially actionable resistance or bypass mechanisms in EGFRm NSCLC.

具有已知驱动因素的非鳞状非小细胞肺癌的综合基因组分析
在晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌(non-sq NSCLC)中,伴随诊断测试(CDx)可识别可操作的驱动改变并指导初始靶向治疗。然而,疾病进展不可避免地通过获得性耐药发生,包括旁路信号通路的激活。尽管综合基因组分析(CGP)可以识别新出现的耐药改变,但其在已知可操作驱动改变患者中的临床应用尚不清楚。我们回顾性分析了2019年6月至2025年8月期间接受CGP治疗的227例患者。CGP前CDx识别的可操作驱动改变的患者构成已知驱动组。我们还分析了全国C-CAT登记,以评估登记记录的治疗实施情况。在227例患者中,74例(32.6%)已知可操作的驱动因素改变。CGP在34名患者(45.9%)中发现了其他临床相关的基因组发现,包括ESCAT I-III或V级改变,与没有已知可操作驱动改变的患者(77/153,50.3%)相当。在egfr突变(EGFRm)亚组中,CGP经常发现与潜在旁路抗性机制一致的改变,包括MET扩增、RET融合和BRAF V600E突变。总体而言,10名患者(13.5%)接受了基于其他发现的cgp引导治疗,均属于EGFRm亚组,而没有非egfr驱动改变的患者接受了cgp引导治疗。在C-CAT登记中,381例EGFRm亚组中有21例(5.5%)记录了cgp相关治疗,155例非egfr驱动亚组中有6例(3.9%)记录了cgp相关治疗,2132例中有195例(9.1%)没有登记定义的驱动改变。这些发现表明,CGP在疾病进展过程中提供了分子重新评估,特别是通过识别与NSCLC EGFRm中潜在可操作的耐药或旁路机制一致的改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Science
Cancer Science ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
3.50%
发文量
406
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Science (formerly Japanese Journal of Cancer Research) is a monthly publication of the Japanese Cancer Association. First published in 1907, the Journal continues to publish original articles, editorials, and letters to the editor, describing original research in the fields of basic, translational and clinical cancer research. The Journal also accepts reports and case reports. Cancer Science aims to present highly significant and timely findings that have a significant clinical impact on oncologists or that may alter the disease concept of a tumor. The Journal will not publish case reports that describe a rare tumor or condition without new findings to be added to previous reports; combination of different tumors without new suggestive findings for oncological research; remarkable effect of already known treatments without suggestive data to explain the exceptional result. Review articles may also be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书