The Spiritual Burnout Scale: Development and Psychometric Validation of a Measure of Spiritual Resource Depletion in Türkiye.

IF 2.2 1区 哲学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Nesrullah Okan, Osman Hatun, Füsun Ekşi, Halil Ekşi, Nihat Köse
{"title":"The Spiritual Burnout Scale: Development and Psychometric Validation of a Measure of Spiritual Resource Depletion in Türkiye.","authors":"Nesrullah Okan, Osman Hatun, Füsun Ekşi, Halil Ekşi, Nihat Köse","doi":"10.1007/s10943-026-02801-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spirituality is widely recognized as a resource for meaning-making and coping, yet comparatively little attention has been devoted to the progressive depletion of spiritual resources. The present study aimed to develop and provide initial psychometric validation of the spiritual burnout scale (SBS), a theoretically grounded instrument assessing spiritual meaning loss and spiritual exhaustion. Four independent samples of university students in Türkiye were used for principal component analysis (PCA; n = 342), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; n = 195), criterion-related validity (n = 57), and test-retest reliability (n = 47). PCA identified a 16-item, two-factor structure, and CFA supported the proposed model (χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 2.86, CFI = .961, TLI = .947, IFI = .962, RMSEA = .074). Convergent validity was supported by satisfactory average variance extracted and composite reliability values, whereas evidence for discriminant validity was less conclusive for spiritual exhaustion. Criterion-related validity showed the expected overall pattern of negative associations with spiritual integrity and spiritual psychological robustness, although the association between spiritual exhaustion and spiritual integrity was not statistically significant. Internal consistency was excellent for spiritual meaning loss (α = .940), spiritual exhaustion (α = .907), and the total scale (α = .944). Test-retest reliability over a 15-day interval was satisfactory (r = .798, p < .001). These findings provide initial support for the reliability and structural validity of SBS scores among university students in Türkiye. Because two items refer directly to inner peace, future studies should examine their possible overlap with mental health and closely related psychosocial measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":48054,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religion & Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Religion & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-026-02801-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spirituality is widely recognized as a resource for meaning-making and coping, yet comparatively little attention has been devoted to the progressive depletion of spiritual resources. The present study aimed to develop and provide initial psychometric validation of the spiritual burnout scale (SBS), a theoretically grounded instrument assessing spiritual meaning loss and spiritual exhaustion. Four independent samples of university students in Türkiye were used for principal component analysis (PCA; n = 342), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; n = 195), criterion-related validity (n = 57), and test-retest reliability (n = 47). PCA identified a 16-item, two-factor structure, and CFA supported the proposed model (χ2/df = 2.86, CFI = .961, TLI = .947, IFI = .962, RMSEA = .074). Convergent validity was supported by satisfactory average variance extracted and composite reliability values, whereas evidence for discriminant validity was less conclusive for spiritual exhaustion. Criterion-related validity showed the expected overall pattern of negative associations with spiritual integrity and spiritual psychological robustness, although the association between spiritual exhaustion and spiritual integrity was not statistically significant. Internal consistency was excellent for spiritual meaning loss (α = .940), spiritual exhaustion (α = .907), and the total scale (α = .944). Test-retest reliability over a 15-day interval was satisfactory (r = .798, p < .001). These findings provide initial support for the reliability and structural validity of SBS scores among university students in Türkiye. Because two items refer directly to inner peace, future studies should examine their possible overlap with mental health and closely related psychosocial measures.

精神倦怠量表:基耶族精神资源耗竭量表的开发与心理计量学验证。
灵性被广泛认为是一种意义创造和应对的资源,但相对而言,很少有人关注灵性资源的逐渐枯竭。摘要本研究旨在开发精神倦怠量表(SBS),并对其进行初步的心理计量学验证。SBS是一种评估精神意义丧失和精神衰竭的理论基础工具。采用4个独立样本进行主成分分析(PCA, n = 342)、验证性因子分析(CFA, n = 195)、标准相关效度(n = 57)和重测信度(n = 47)。PCA鉴定出一个包含16个条目的双因素结构,而CFA支持所提出的模型(χ2/df = 2.86, CFI =。[翻译]:947、if =。962, rmsea = .074)。收敛效度的平均方差提取和复合信度值令人满意,而判别效度的证据对精神衰竭的结论不太有力。标准相关效度显示精神完整性和精神心理稳健性呈负相关,尽管精神衰竭和精神完整性之间的关联无统计学意义。内部一致性在精神意义丧失方面表现优异(α =。940),精神衰竭(α =。907),总量表(α = .944)。15天内的重测信度令人满意(r =。798页
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
21.40%
发文量
220
期刊介绍: Journal of Religion and Health is an international publication concerned with the creative partnership of psychology and religion/sprituality and the relationship between religion/spirituality and both mental and physical health. This multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary journal publishes peer-reviewed original contributions from scholars and professionals of all religious faiths. Articles may be clinical, statistical, theoretical, impressionistic, or anecdotal. Founded in 1961 by the Blanton-Peale Institute, which joins the perspectives of psychology and religion, Journal of Religion and Health explores the most contemporary modes of religious thought with particular emphasis on their relevance to current medical and psychological research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书