Side-to-side repair improves coronal meniscal extrusion in lateral meniscus oblique radial tears concomitant with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

IF 3.2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2026-09-21 eCollection Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.1002/jeo2.70916
Kyota Ishibashi, Hikaru Kristi Ishibashi, Eiji Sasaki, Yuka Kimura, Yasuyuki Ishibashi
{"title":"Side-to-side repair improves coronal meniscal extrusion in lateral meniscus oblique radial tears concomitant with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.","authors":"Kyota Ishibashi, Hikaru Kristi Ishibashi, Eiji Sasaki, Yuka Kimura, Yasuyuki Ishibashi","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the proportion of lateral meniscus oblique radial tear repairs during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and compare extrusion and clinical outcomes between side-to-side repair of lateral meniscus oblique radial tear and posterior longitudinal tear repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among 609 primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions from 2016 to 2023, 34 patients with intraoperatively confirmed lateral meniscus oblique radial tear underwent side-to-side repair and magnetic resonance imaging at 6 months and 1 year; 27 with posterior longitudinal tears underwent all-inside repair. Coronal and sagittal lateral meniscal extrusion, clinical outcomes, knee stability and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales were compared. Multivariate regression assessed predictors of preoperative-to-1-year coronal extrusion change; receiver operating characteristic analysis assessed whether preoperative lateral meniscal extrusion distinguished tear types.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lateral meniscus oblique radial tear treated with side-to-side repair accounted for 7.4% of cases. Preoperative coronal lateral meniscal extrusion was greater in the lateral meniscus oblique radial tear group than in the longitudinal tear group (1.71 ± 1.31 vs. 0.32 ± 0.61 mm; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Coronal extrusion improved by approximately 0.6 mm after lateral meniscus oblique radial tear repair and was similar between groups at 1 year; sagittal extrusion increased slightly in both groups. Clinical outcomes were similar at 1 year and final follow-up. Preoperative coronal lateral meniscal extrusion was an independent predictor of coronal extrusion change (<i>β</i> = -0.514, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Preoperative coronal lateral meniscal extrusion >1.0 mm identified lateral meniscus oblique radial tear with acceptable diagnostic performance (area under the curve = 0.787, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Side-to-side lateral meniscus oblique radial tear repair during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction reduced coronal extrusion by 1 year to levels comparable to those of longitudinal tear repair, with similar clinical outcomes. These findings support side-to-side repair as a reliable meniscal preservation strategy.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"13 3","pages":"e70916"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13592544/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jeo2.70916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the proportion of lateral meniscus oblique radial tear repairs during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and compare extrusion and clinical outcomes between side-to-side repair of lateral meniscus oblique radial tear and posterior longitudinal tear repair.

Methods: Among 609 primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions from 2016 to 2023, 34 patients with intraoperatively confirmed lateral meniscus oblique radial tear underwent side-to-side repair and magnetic resonance imaging at 6 months and 1 year; 27 with posterior longitudinal tears underwent all-inside repair. Coronal and sagittal lateral meniscal extrusion, clinical outcomes, knee stability and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales were compared. Multivariate regression assessed predictors of preoperative-to-1-year coronal extrusion change; receiver operating characteristic analysis assessed whether preoperative lateral meniscal extrusion distinguished tear types.

Results: Lateral meniscus oblique radial tear treated with side-to-side repair accounted for 7.4% of cases. Preoperative coronal lateral meniscal extrusion was greater in the lateral meniscus oblique radial tear group than in the longitudinal tear group (1.71 ± 1.31 vs. 0.32 ± 0.61 mm; p < 0.001). Coronal extrusion improved by approximately 0.6 mm after lateral meniscus oblique radial tear repair and was similar between groups at 1 year; sagittal extrusion increased slightly in both groups. Clinical outcomes were similar at 1 year and final follow-up. Preoperative coronal lateral meniscal extrusion was an independent predictor of coronal extrusion change (β = -0.514, p < 0.001). Preoperative coronal lateral meniscal extrusion >1.0 mm identified lateral meniscus oblique radial tear with acceptable diagnostic performance (area under the curve = 0.787, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Side-to-side lateral meniscus oblique radial tear repair during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction reduced coronal extrusion by 1 year to levels comparable to those of longitudinal tear repair, with similar clinical outcomes. These findings support side-to-side repair as a reliable meniscal preservation strategy.

Level of evidence: Level III.

侧对侧修复改善冠状半月板挤压外侧半月板斜桡骨撕裂伴前交叉韧带重建。
目的:确定前交叉韧带重建中外侧半月板斜向径向撕裂修复的比例,比较外侧半月板斜向径向撕裂侧对侧修复与后向纵向撕裂侧对侧修复的挤压和临床效果。方法:2016 - 2023年609例原发性前交叉韧带重建术中,术中确诊外侧半月板斜向桡骨撕裂的患者34例,分别于6个月和1年行侧对侧修复和磁共振成像;27例后纵撕裂行全内修复。比较冠状面和矢状面外侧半月板挤压、临床结果、膝关节稳定性、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分亚量表。多因素回归评估术前至1年冠状动脉挤压变化的预测因素;接受者操作特征分析评估术前外侧半月板挤压是否能区分撕裂类型。结果:外侧半月板斜向桡骨撕裂行侧侧修复占7.4%。术前,外侧半月板斜向径向撕裂组冠状外侧半月板挤压大于纵向撕裂组(1.71±1.31 vs 0.32±0.61 mm);p β = -0.514, p 1.0 mm识别外侧半月板斜向径向撕裂具有可接受的诊断性能(曲线下面积= 0.787,p)。结论:前交叉韧带重建中侧对侧外侧半月板斜向径向撕裂修复可将冠状动脉挤压减少1年,达到与纵向撕裂修复相当的水平,临床结果相似。这些发现支持侧对侧修复作为可靠的半月板保存策略。证据等级:三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书