Deep learning-based prediction of diffusion MRI responses from microvascular OCT angiograms.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Jaloliddin Rustamov, Zahiriddin Rustamov, Frédéric Lesage, Nazar Zaki, Rafat Damseh
{"title":"Deep learning-based prediction of diffusion MRI responses from microvascular OCT angiograms.","authors":"Jaloliddin Rustamov, Zahiriddin Rustamov, Frédéric Lesage, Nazar Zaki, Rafat Damseh","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/aeaa9f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signals are sensitive to microvascular geometry and hemodynamics, but current approaches rely on computationally intensive simulations on optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived vascular graphs. We investigated whether three-dimensional deep learning models can serve as fast surrogates that predict diffusion MRI responses directly from microvascular OCT angiograms.<i>Approach.</i>Five mouse cortical OCT angiograms were segmented into 4792 vascular subgraphs and converted into nine-channel image volumes encoding vascular geometry, magnetic field gradient, hematocrit, oxygen saturation, partial oxygen pressure, blood velocity magnitude, and three velocity components. For each sample, a physics-based framework generated spin echo (SE) and diffusion-weighted signals for three-values (50, 100, 500 s mm), three gradient timing pairs, and ten gradient directions. We trained five 3D architectures (AutoEncoder, BasicUNet, DenseNet169, EfficientNetB4 and ResNet) with late fusion of acquisition parameters and evaluated performance using MSE, MAE and.<i>Main results.</i>Under within-distribution (random-split) evaluation, testvalues were at least 0.87. DenseNet169 achieved the best overall accuracy (MSE, MAE,) and maintainedacross all diffusion settings, while ResNet provided near-perfect reconstruction of the SE sequence alone (). Leave-one-subject-out cross-validation gave MSE, MAE, and, with 34.4% of held-out samples reaching. Channel ablation revealed velocity magnitude and velocity components as dominant predictors. Once trained, the models predicted full diffusion responses in milliseconds, providing speedups of four to six orders of magnitude compared with simulations.<i>Significance.</i>These results demonstrate that deep learning surrogates can accurately and efficiently approximate diffusion MRI responses from microvascular OCT angiograms, enabling rapid exploration of microvascular configurations and acquisition protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aeaa9f","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective.Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signals are sensitive to microvascular geometry and hemodynamics, but current approaches rely on computationally intensive simulations on optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived vascular graphs. We investigated whether three-dimensional deep learning models can serve as fast surrogates that predict diffusion MRI responses directly from microvascular OCT angiograms.Approach.Five mouse cortical OCT angiograms were segmented into 4792 vascular subgraphs and converted into nine-channel image volumes encoding vascular geometry, magnetic field gradient, hematocrit, oxygen saturation, partial oxygen pressure, blood velocity magnitude, and three velocity components. For each sample, a physics-based framework generated spin echo (SE) and diffusion-weighted signals for three-values (50, 100, 500 s mm), three gradient timing pairs, and ten gradient directions. We trained five 3D architectures (AutoEncoder, BasicUNet, DenseNet169, EfficientNetB4 and ResNet) with late fusion of acquisition parameters and evaluated performance using MSE, MAE and.Main results.Under within-distribution (random-split) evaluation, testvalues were at least 0.87. DenseNet169 achieved the best overall accuracy (MSE, MAE,) and maintainedacross all diffusion settings, while ResNet provided near-perfect reconstruction of the SE sequence alone (). Leave-one-subject-out cross-validation gave MSE, MAE, and, with 34.4% of held-out samples reaching. Channel ablation revealed velocity magnitude and velocity components as dominant predictors. Once trained, the models predicted full diffusion responses in milliseconds, providing speedups of four to six orders of magnitude compared with simulations.Significance.These results demonstrate that deep learning surrogates can accurately and efficiently approximate diffusion MRI responses from microvascular OCT angiograms, enabling rapid exploration of microvascular configurations and acquisition protocols.

基于深度学习的微血管OCT血管成像弥散性MRI反应预测。
目标。扩散磁共振成像(MRI)信号对微血管几何和血流动力学非常敏感,但目前的方法依赖于光学相干断层扫描(OCT)衍生血管图的计算密集型模拟。我们调查了三个&连字符;维深度学习模型可以作为快速替代品,直接从微血管OCT血管成像中预测弥散性MRI反应。5张小鼠皮质OCT血管图被分割成4792张血管亚图,并转换成9 &连字符;通道图像体积编码血管几何形状、磁场梯度、红细胞压积、氧饱和度、氧分压、血流速度大小和三个速度分量。对于每个样本,一个物理连字符;基于框架生成自旋回波(SE)和扩散&连字符;加权信号为三个值(50,100,500 s/mm2),三个梯度时序对,和十个梯度方向。我们训练了5种3D架构(AutoEncoder、BasicUNet、DenseNet169、EfficientNetB4和ResNet),并使用后期采集参数融合,并使用MSE、MAE和r2评估性能。在within‐分布(随机&连字符;分裂)评价,testr2值至少为0.87。DenseNet169在所有扩散设置中获得了最佳的总体精度(MSE = 0.0039 ± 0.0029, MAE = 0.0397 ± 0.0161,R2= 0.92),并且保持了dr2 > 0.80,而ResNet提供了近&连线;单SE序列的完美重建(R2≈ 1.00)。Leave‐ one&hyphen subject‐cross‐验证得到MSE = 0.0173 ± 0.0012, MAE = 0.094 ± 0.004, r2 = 0.666 ± 0.019,其中包含34.4%的连字符;样品gr2 &ge; 0.80。通道消融显示速度大小和速度分量是主要的预测因子。经过训练后,这些模型可以在几毫秒内预测出完整的扩散反应,与模拟相比,可以提供4到6个数量级的加速。这些结果表明,深度学习替代品可以准确有效地近似微血管OCT血管图的扩散MRI响应,从而能够快速探索微血管结构和获取协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics in medicine and biology
Physics in medicine and biology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
409
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书