Children's participation in assent to paediatric oncology research: experiences of children, siblings and parents.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2026-09-21 DOI:10.1186/s13063-026-10011-2
Kajsa Norberg Wieslander, Sara Frygner-Holm, Stefan Nilsson, Malin Lövgren, Anna Höglund, Tove Godskesen
{"title":"Children's participation in assent to paediatric oncology research: experiences of children, siblings and parents.","authors":"Kajsa Norberg Wieslander, Sara Frygner-Holm, Stefan Nilsson, Malin Lövgren, Anna Höglund, Tove Godskesen","doi":"10.1186/s13063-026-10011-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research is essential for improving outcomes in paediatric oncology, yet decisions about research participation often occur during emotionally vulnerable periods for families. Although children's assent is ethically required, it is not always meaningfully implemented in practice. Understanding how children, siblings and parents experience the child's involvement in the assent process, including their attitudes towards research, is crucial for promoting ethically sound research and supporting genuine child participation. The aim of this study was to describe how children with cancer, siblings and parents experience the child's assent process during research recruitment in paediatric oncology, with particular attention to its motivational and relational dimensions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive qualitative study design. Interviews were undertaken with children with cancer (n = 11), siblings (n = 17) and parents (n = 9) regarding their experiences of recruitment to various types of research in Sweden. Data was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two main themes were identified: a moral and emotional commitment to research, and relational assent-trust, loyalty and parental mediation. Children, siblings and parents described research participation as meaningful and morally significant in a vulnerable situation. Children's involvement in assent ranged from active participation to limited influence, with some decisions made primarily by parents. Decisions about research participation were shaped by relational dynamics, in which trust, loyalty, and emotional vulnerability and parental mediation played central roles.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Families are strongly motivated to contribute to research in paediatric oncology. However, sustaining trust and safeguarding research integrity require consistent and meaningful implementation of children's assent. Child-centred, flexible, and context-sensitive assent processes are key, alongside ethical awareness of how relational dynamics shape children's autonomy. Recognising parents as key partners is essential for upholding both ethical standards and children's rights in paediatric research.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13591860/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-026-10011-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Research is essential for improving outcomes in paediatric oncology, yet decisions about research participation often occur during emotionally vulnerable periods for families. Although children's assent is ethically required, it is not always meaningfully implemented in practice. Understanding how children, siblings and parents experience the child's involvement in the assent process, including their attitudes towards research, is crucial for promoting ethically sound research and supporting genuine child participation. The aim of this study was to describe how children with cancer, siblings and parents experience the child's assent process during research recruitment in paediatric oncology, with particular attention to its motivational and relational dimensions.

Methods: A descriptive qualitative study design. Interviews were undertaken with children with cancer (n = 11), siblings (n = 17) and parents (n = 9) regarding their experiences of recruitment to various types of research in Sweden. Data was analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Two main themes were identified: a moral and emotional commitment to research, and relational assent-trust, loyalty and parental mediation. Children, siblings and parents described research participation as meaningful and morally significant in a vulnerable situation. Children's involvement in assent ranged from active participation to limited influence, with some decisions made primarily by parents. Decisions about research participation were shaped by relational dynamics, in which trust, loyalty, and emotional vulnerability and parental mediation played central roles.

Conclusions: Families are strongly motivated to contribute to research in paediatric oncology. However, sustaining trust and safeguarding research integrity require consistent and meaningful implementation of children's assent. Child-centred, flexible, and context-sensitive assent processes are key, alongside ethical awareness of how relational dynamics shape children's autonomy. Recognising parents as key partners is essential for upholding both ethical standards and children's rights in paediatric research.

儿童参与同意儿科肿瘤学研究:儿童、兄弟姐妹和父母的经验。
背景:研究对于改善儿科肿瘤学的预后至关重要,然而关于参与研究的决定往往发生在家庭情绪脆弱的时期。虽然儿童的同意在道德上是必需的,但在实践中并不总是有意义地执行。了解孩子、兄弟姐妹和父母如何体验孩子参与同意过程,包括他们对研究的态度,对于促进合乎道德的研究和支持真正的儿童参与至关重要。本研究的目的是描述在儿科肿瘤学研究招募过程中,患有癌症的儿童、兄弟姐妹和父母如何体验儿童的同意过程,特别关注其动机和关系维度。方法:采用描述性定性研究设计。对患有癌症的儿童(n = 11)、兄弟姐妹(n = 17)和父母(n = 9)进行了访谈,了解他们在瑞典参加各种研究的经历。数据分析采用反身性主题分析。结果:确定了两个主要主题:对研究的道德和情感承诺,以及关系同意-信任,忠诚和父母调解。儿童、兄弟姐妹和父母认为,在脆弱的情况下,参与研究是有意义和道德意义的。儿童对同意的参与从积极参与到影响有限不等,有些决定主要由父母作出。参与研究的决定受到关系动力学的影响,其中信任、忠诚、情感脆弱性和父母调解发挥了核心作用。结论:家庭积极参与儿科肿瘤研究。然而,维持信任和保护研究的完整性需要始终如一地、有意义地执行儿童的同意。以儿童为中心,灵活和上下文敏感的同意过程是关键,以及关系动态如何塑造儿童自主性的道德意识。承认父母是关键的合作伙伴,对于维护儿科研究中的道德标准和儿童权利至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书