Early revascularization in symptomatic carotid artery disease leads to better outcomes: A 10-year multicenter cohort analysis.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Diego Sanchez-Calderin, James F Meschia, Gyanendra Kumar, Robert D Brown, Bernard R Bendok, Kevin Barrett, W Chris Fox, David A Miller, Camilo Polania-Sandoval, Ekin Inal, Camila Esquetini-Vernon, Sukhwinder S J Sandhu, Richard D Beegle, Houssam Farres, Giuseppe Lanzino, Young Erben
{"title":"Early revascularization in symptomatic carotid artery disease leads to better outcomes: A 10-year multicenter cohort analysis.","authors":"Diego Sanchez-Calderin, James F Meschia, Gyanendra Kumar, Robert D Brown, Bernard R Bendok, Kevin Barrett, W Chris Fox, David A Miller, Camilo Polania-Sandoval, Ekin Inal, Camila Esquetini-Vernon, Sukhwinder S J Sandhu, Richard D Beegle, Houssam Farres, Giuseppe Lanzino, Young Erben","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2026.07.086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Randomized trials and meta-analyses have suggested that earlier intervention for symptomatic carotid artery disease may benefit patients, yet the optimal timing window remains debated. This study evaluated the impact of timing of revascularization on perioperative and long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of 821 carotid revascularization procedures for carotid artery disease from 2016 to 2026, excluding patients with previous neck radiation. Procedures were stratified by time from symptom onset to intervention into urgent (0-2 days), early (3-14 days), and delayed (≥15 days) groups. Perioperative end points included 30-day mortality, ipsilateral stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), myocardial infarction (MI), and a composite of these events. Long-term outcome end points included all-cause mortality, ipsilateral stroke, TIA, MI, restenosis, and reintervention. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of the 30-day composite outcome and long-term reintervention. Sensitivity analyses were also included excluding patients who underwent thrombolysis or thrombectomy to adjust for factors related to adjunct procedures at the time of initial neurovascular event presentation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort had a median age of 74.2 years (interquartile range, 66.7-80.5) and was predominantly composed of male patients (69.4%), with high rates of hypertension (86.1%), hyperlipidemia (84.4%), and coronary artery disease (35.6%). The most common presentation was stroke (48.4%), followed by TIA (31.8%) and amaurosis fugax (19.9%). The 30-day composite outcome of stroke, TIA, MI, or death was significantly lower in the early group (2.8%) than in the delayed (4.0%) and urgent (8.0%) groups (P = .03). Thirty-day mortality was significantly higher in the urgent group (2.9%) than in the early (0.3%) and delayed (0.3%) groups (P = .01). On multivariable Cox regression, urgent timing [hazard ratio (HR), 2.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-6.12; P = .044] and absence of preoperative antithrombotic therapy (HR, 3.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.46-9.64; P = .006) were independent predictors of the 30-day composite outcome. At a median follow-up of 2.8 years (interquartile range, 1.1-5.3), all-cause mortality was comparable across groups (urgent, 20.4% vs early, 18.5% vs delayed, 16.5%; P = .57). Long-term MI was more frequent in the early group (4.7%) than in the urgent (1.5%) and delayed (1.6%) groups (P = .03), confined entirely to those initially presenting with TIA on subgroup analysis. Long-term restenosis was highest in the urgent group (9.5%), followed by delayed (5.3%) and early groups (3.9%; P = .05). Reintervention rates followed the same pattern (urgent, 6.6% vs delayed, 3.1% vs early, 1.1%; P < .01), with a 3-year reintervention-free survival of 97.9% for early, 76.3% for urgent, and 74.6% for delayed (log-rank P = .009). On multivariable Cox regression, both urgent (HR, 4.13; P = .018) and delayed (HR, 5.63; P = .003) timing were independently associated with higher reintervention risk compared with early revascularization. In both sensitivity analysis excluding patients who underwent thrombolysis and thrombectomy, 30-day composite outcomes remained significantly higher for the urgent group, as did restenosis and reinterventions outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early carotid revascularization between 3 and 14 days after neurovascular symptoms have most favorable perioperative and long-term outcomes compared with both urgent and delayed intervention. Urgent revascularization carries significantly higher perioperative risk, whereas delayed intervention beyond 14 days reduces the potential preventive benefit of timely revascularization and is associated with higher long-term reintervention rates. These findings support consideration of revascularization within a 3- to 14-day window as the optimal strategy for symptomatic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2026.07.086","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Randomized trials and meta-analyses have suggested that earlier intervention for symptomatic carotid artery disease may benefit patients, yet the optimal timing window remains debated. This study evaluated the impact of timing of revascularization on perioperative and long-term outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 821 carotid revascularization procedures for carotid artery disease from 2016 to 2026, excluding patients with previous neck radiation. Procedures were stratified by time from symptom onset to intervention into urgent (0-2 days), early (3-14 days), and delayed (≥15 days) groups. Perioperative end points included 30-day mortality, ipsilateral stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), myocardial infarction (MI), and a composite of these events. Long-term outcome end points included all-cause mortality, ipsilateral stroke, TIA, MI, restenosis, and reintervention. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of the 30-day composite outcome and long-term reintervention. Sensitivity analyses were also included excluding patients who underwent thrombolysis or thrombectomy to adjust for factors related to adjunct procedures at the time of initial neurovascular event presentation.

Results: The study cohort had a median age of 74.2 years (interquartile range, 66.7-80.5) and was predominantly composed of male patients (69.4%), with high rates of hypertension (86.1%), hyperlipidemia (84.4%), and coronary artery disease (35.6%). The most common presentation was stroke (48.4%), followed by TIA (31.8%) and amaurosis fugax (19.9%). The 30-day composite outcome of stroke, TIA, MI, or death was significantly lower in the early group (2.8%) than in the delayed (4.0%) and urgent (8.0%) groups (P = .03). Thirty-day mortality was significantly higher in the urgent group (2.9%) than in the early (0.3%) and delayed (0.3%) groups (P = .01). On multivariable Cox regression, urgent timing [hazard ratio (HR), 2.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-6.12; P = .044] and absence of preoperative antithrombotic therapy (HR, 3.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.46-9.64; P = .006) were independent predictors of the 30-day composite outcome. At a median follow-up of 2.8 years (interquartile range, 1.1-5.3), all-cause mortality was comparable across groups (urgent, 20.4% vs early, 18.5% vs delayed, 16.5%; P = .57). Long-term MI was more frequent in the early group (4.7%) than in the urgent (1.5%) and delayed (1.6%) groups (P = .03), confined entirely to those initially presenting with TIA on subgroup analysis. Long-term restenosis was highest in the urgent group (9.5%), followed by delayed (5.3%) and early groups (3.9%; P = .05). Reintervention rates followed the same pattern (urgent, 6.6% vs delayed, 3.1% vs early, 1.1%; P < .01), with a 3-year reintervention-free survival of 97.9% for early, 76.3% for urgent, and 74.6% for delayed (log-rank P = .009). On multivariable Cox regression, both urgent (HR, 4.13; P = .018) and delayed (HR, 5.63; P = .003) timing were independently associated with higher reintervention risk compared with early revascularization. In both sensitivity analysis excluding patients who underwent thrombolysis and thrombectomy, 30-day composite outcomes remained significantly higher for the urgent group, as did restenosis and reinterventions outcomes.

Conclusions: Early carotid revascularization between 3 and 14 days after neurovascular symptoms have most favorable perioperative and long-term outcomes compared with both urgent and delayed intervention. Urgent revascularization carries significantly higher perioperative risk, whereas delayed intervention beyond 14 days reduces the potential preventive benefit of timely revascularization and is associated with higher long-term reintervention rates. These findings support consideration of revascularization within a 3- to 14-day window as the optimal strategy for symptomatic patients.

症状性颈动脉疾病的早期血运重建导致更好的结果:一项10年多中心队列分析
目的:随机试验和荟萃分析表明,对症状性颈动脉疾病(CAD)的早期干预可能对患者有益,但最佳时间窗仍存在争议。本研究评估了血运重建时机对围手术期和远期预后的影响。方法:我们对2016年至2026年821例CAD颈动脉重建术进行了回顾性分析,不包括既往颈部放疗的患者。从症状出现到干预的时间将手术分为紧急(0-2天)、早期(3-14天)和延迟(≥15天)组。围手术期终点包括30天死亡率、同侧卒中、短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)、心肌梗死(MI)以及这些事件的综合。长期结局终点包括全因死亡率、同侧卒中、TIA、心肌梗死、再狭窄和再干预。进行单变量和多变量Cox比例风险回归分析,以确定30天综合结局和长期再干预的独立预测因素。敏感性分析也包括排除接受溶栓或取栓的患者,以调整初始神经血管事件出现时辅助手术的相关因素。结果:研究队列的中位年龄为74.2岁(IQR为66.7-80.5),以男性患者为主(69.4%),高血压(86.1%)、高脂血症(84.4%)和冠状动脉疾病(35.6%)发生率高。最常见的表现是卒中(48.4%),其次是TIA(31.8%)和黑朦(19.9%)。与延迟(4.0%)和紧急(8.0%)组相比,早期组卒中、TIA、MI或死亡的30天综合结局(2.8%)显著降低(P=0.03)。急诊组30天死亡率(2.9%)明显高于早期组(0.3%)和延迟组(0.3%)(P=0.01)。在多变量Cox回归中,紧急时机(HR 2.50; 95% CI 1.02-6.12; P=0.044)和术前未接受抗栓治疗(HR 3.75; 95% CI 1.46-9.64; P=0.006)是30天综合结局的独立预测因子。中位随访2.8年(IQR 1.1-5.3),各组全因死亡率具有可比性(20.4%紧急vs. 18.5%早期vs. 16.5%延迟;P=0.57)。长期心肌梗死在早期组(4.7%)比紧急组(1.5%)和延迟组(1.6%)更频繁(P=0.03),亚组分析完全局限于最初表现为TIA的患者。急诊组长期再狭窄发生率最高(9.5%),延迟组次之(5.3%),早期组次之(3.9%),P=0.05。再干预率也遵循同样的模式(紧急6.6% vs延迟3.1% vs早期1.1%)。结论:与紧急和延迟干预相比,神经血管症状出现后3 - 14天的早期颈动脉血运重建术具有更好的围手术期和长期预后。紧急血运重建术的围手术期风险明显更高,而延迟干预超过14天会降低及时血运重建术的潜在预防效益,并与较高的长期再干预率相关。这些发现支持在3- 14天内进行血运重建是有症状患者的最佳策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书