Enhancing diagnostic precision for BI-RADS 4a breast nodules: A multimodal AI model integrating ultrasound radiomics, hemodynamic signatures, and clinical profiles

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jun Yang, Longman Long, Guang Li, Jian Zeng, Caixiao Peng, Jingting Yan
{"title":"Enhancing diagnostic precision for BI-RADS 4a breast nodules: A multimodal AI model integrating ultrasound radiomics, hemodynamic signatures, and clinical profiles","authors":"Jun Yang,&nbsp;Longman Long,&nbsp;Guang Li,&nbsp;Jian Zeng,&nbsp;Caixiao Peng,&nbsp;Jingting Yan","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4a nodules represent a diagnostic dilemma, with a malignancy rate ranging from 2% to 10%. The majority of these nodules prove benign after biopsy, leading to unnecessary invasive procedures, patient anxiety, and healthcare costs. Current clinical practice lacks a reliable, noninvasive tool to accurately distinguish benign from malignant BI-RADS 4a lesions. Emerging evidence suggests that integrating multiparametric ultrasound data with clinical factors through artificial intelligence may improve diagnostic precision, but a validated multimodal model specifically for this ambiguous category is lacking.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To develop and validate a multimodal artificial intelligence model that integrates ultrasound radiomics, hemodynamic features, and clinical data for the accurate differentiation of benign and malignant BI-RADS 4a breast nodules, with the ultimate goal of supporting clinical decisionmaking and safely reducing unnecessary biopsies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This prospective, multicenter study enrolled 350 pathologically confirmed BI-RADS 4a nodules from 331 patients in one tertiary hospital and two secondary hospitals. Clinical data, grayscale ultrasound images, and hemodynamic parameters were collected for each nodule. Radiomics features were extracted from the ultrasound images. A multimodal fusion model was constructed using the Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) algorithm following feature selection via Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression. The model was developed and hyperparameter-tuned on a training set (<i>n</i> = 260) using nested cross-validation and was evaluated on a temporally independent test set (<i>n</i> = 90). Model interpretability was enhanced using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>On the independent test set, the multimodal LightGBM model demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91–0.99), with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 81.5%–100%) and a specificity of 86.1% (95% CI: 75.8%–93.1%). Its performance was significantly superior to baseline classifiers including Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, and Random Forest (all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). SHAP analysis identified wavelet-transformed texture features, the presence of a penetrating vessel, and BRCA mutation status as the top predictors of malignancy. Applying this model could have potentially avoided 32.4% (24/74) of unnecessary biopsies on benign nodules while maintaining perfect sensitivity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>A multimodal AI model based on LightGBM can accurately differentiate benign and malignant BI-RADS 4a breast nodules. It shows significant potential as a clinical decision-support tool to reduce unnecessary biopsies without compromising sensitivity, enabling more precise management for this challenging patient population.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"27 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13594395/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70800","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4a nodules represent a diagnostic dilemma, with a malignancy rate ranging from 2% to 10%. The majority of these nodules prove benign after biopsy, leading to unnecessary invasive procedures, patient anxiety, and healthcare costs. Current clinical practice lacks a reliable, noninvasive tool to accurately distinguish benign from malignant BI-RADS 4a lesions. Emerging evidence suggests that integrating multiparametric ultrasound data with clinical factors through artificial intelligence may improve diagnostic precision, but a validated multimodal model specifically for this ambiguous category is lacking.

Purpose

To develop and validate a multimodal artificial intelligence model that integrates ultrasound radiomics, hemodynamic features, and clinical data for the accurate differentiation of benign and malignant BI-RADS 4a breast nodules, with the ultimate goal of supporting clinical decisionmaking and safely reducing unnecessary biopsies.

Methods

This prospective, multicenter study enrolled 350 pathologically confirmed BI-RADS 4a nodules from 331 patients in one tertiary hospital and two secondary hospitals. Clinical data, grayscale ultrasound images, and hemodynamic parameters were collected for each nodule. Radiomics features were extracted from the ultrasound images. A multimodal fusion model was constructed using the Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) algorithm following feature selection via Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression. The model was developed and hyperparameter-tuned on a training set (n = 260) using nested cross-validation and was evaluated on a temporally independent test set (n = 90). Model interpretability was enhanced using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).

Results

On the independent test set, the multimodal LightGBM model demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91–0.99), with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 81.5%–100%) and a specificity of 86.1% (95% CI: 75.8%–93.1%). Its performance was significantly superior to baseline classifiers including Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, and Random Forest (all p < 0.05). SHAP analysis identified wavelet-transformed texture features, the presence of a penetrating vessel, and BRCA mutation status as the top predictors of malignancy. Applying this model could have potentially avoided 32.4% (24/74) of unnecessary biopsies on benign nodules while maintaining perfect sensitivity.

Conclusion

A multimodal AI model based on LightGBM can accurately differentiate benign and malignant BI-RADS 4a breast nodules. It shows significant potential as a clinical decision-support tool to reduce unnecessary biopsies without compromising sensitivity, enabling more precise management for this challenging patient population.

提高BI-RADS 4a乳腺结节的诊断精度:一种集成超声放射组学、血流动力学特征和临床资料的多模态人工智能模型
背景:乳腺成像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS) 4a结节是一种诊断困境,其恶性率为2%至10%。这些结节大多数在活检后证明是良性的,导致不必要的侵入性手术,患者焦虑和医疗保健费用。目前的临床实践缺乏一种可靠的、无创的工具来准确区分BI-RADS 4a病变的良恶性。新出现的证据表明,通过人工智能将多参数超声数据与临床因素相结合可以提高诊断精度,但缺乏专门针对这一模糊类别的有效多模态模型。目的:开发并验证一种集成超声放射组学、血流动力学特征和临床数据的多模态人工智能模型,用于准确区分BI-RADS 4a乳腺结节的良恶性,最终目的是支持临床决策并安全减少不必要的活检。方法:这项前瞻性、多中心研究纳入了来自一家三级医院和两家二级医院的331例病理证实的BI-RADS 4a结节。收集每个结节的临床资料、灰度超声图像及血流动力学参数。从超声图像中提取放射组学特征。通过最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归进行特征选择,利用光梯度增强机(LightGBM)算法构建多模态融合模型。使用嵌套交叉验证在训练集(n = 260)上开发和超参数调优模型,并在暂时独立的测试集(n = 90)上进行评估。采用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)增强模型可解释性。结果:在独立测试集上,多模态LightGBM模型表现出优异的诊断性能,受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为0.95 (95% CI: 0.91-0.99),灵敏度为100% (95% CI: 81.5%-100%),特异性为86.1% (95% CI: 75.8%-93.1%)。其性能明显优于Logistic回归、支持向量机、随机森林等基线分类器(均p)。结论:基于LightGBM的多模态AI模型能够准确区分BI-RADS 4a乳腺结节的良恶性。它显示了作为临床决策支持工具的巨大潜力,可以在不影响敏感性的情况下减少不必要的活检,从而对这一具有挑战性的患者群体进行更精确的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书