The Effects of Cancer Fear and Ruminative Thinking Styles on Attitudes Toward Cancer Screening Among Cancer Caregivers.

IF 1.6 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Muhammet Faruk Yiğit, Yakup Sarpdağı, Mehmet Uçar
{"title":"The Effects of Cancer Fear and Ruminative Thinking Styles on Attitudes Toward Cancer Screening Among Cancer Caregivers.","authors":"Muhammet Faruk Yiğit, Yakup Sarpdağı, Mehmet Uçar","doi":"10.1007/s10880-026-10173-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite being exposed to a high risk of cancer and a substantial psychological burden, cancer caregivers often neglect their own health check-ups and cancer screening behaviors. This study aimed to examine the effects of ruminative thinking styles and cancer fear on attitudes toward cancer screening among cancer caregivers. This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted between August 2025 and January 2026 with 446 primary caregivers of patients receiving outpatient treatment in the medical and radiation oncology departments of a training and research hospital located in eastern Turkey. Data were collected through face‒to-face interviews via a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Cancer Fear Scale, the Ruminative Thought Style Scale, and the short form of the Attitudes Toward Cancer Screening Scale. The results revealed a moderate, positive, and statistically significant association between fear of cancer and ruminative thoughts (r = 0.543, p < 0.001). Hierarchical regression analysis showed that fear of cancer explained 19.3% of the variance in attitudes toward cancer screening (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.193) and that when ruminative thought was included, the explained variance increased to 22.4% (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.224). Both variables were identified as significant and negative predictors of attitudes toward cancer screening (p < 0.001). This indicated that ruminative thought partially mediated the relationship between fear of cancer and attitudes toward cancer screening (indirect effect = -0.106, 95% bootstrap CI [- 0.171, -0.056]). These results show that fear of cancer and ruminative thoughts constitute significant psychological barriers that negatively influence the attitudes of individuals providing care to patients with cancer. This underscores the importance for care providers to develop interventions targeting these psychological barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":15494,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-026-10173-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite being exposed to a high risk of cancer and a substantial psychological burden, cancer caregivers often neglect their own health check-ups and cancer screening behaviors. This study aimed to examine the effects of ruminative thinking styles and cancer fear on attitudes toward cancer screening among cancer caregivers. This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted between August 2025 and January 2026 with 446 primary caregivers of patients receiving outpatient treatment in the medical and radiation oncology departments of a training and research hospital located in eastern Turkey. Data were collected through face‒to-face interviews via a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Cancer Fear Scale, the Ruminative Thought Style Scale, and the short form of the Attitudes Toward Cancer Screening Scale. The results revealed a moderate, positive, and statistically significant association between fear of cancer and ruminative thoughts (r = 0.543, p < 0.001). Hierarchical regression analysis showed that fear of cancer explained 19.3% of the variance in attitudes toward cancer screening (R2 = 0.193) and that when ruminative thought was included, the explained variance increased to 22.4% (R2 = 0.224). Both variables were identified as significant and negative predictors of attitudes toward cancer screening (p < 0.001). This indicated that ruminative thought partially mediated the relationship between fear of cancer and attitudes toward cancer screening (indirect effect = -0.106, 95% bootstrap CI [- 0.171, -0.056]). These results show that fear of cancer and ruminative thoughts constitute significant psychological barriers that negatively influence the attitudes of individuals providing care to patients with cancer. This underscores the importance for care providers to develop interventions targeting these psychological barriers.

癌症恐惧和反刍思维方式对癌症照护者癌症筛查态度的影响
尽管面临着很高的癌症风险和巨大的心理负担,但癌症护理人员经常忽视自己的健康检查和癌症筛查行为。本研究旨在探讨反刍思维方式和癌症恐惧对癌症护理人员癌症筛查态度的影响。这项横断面描述性研究是在2025年8月至2026年1月期间对土耳其东部一家培训和研究医院内科和放射肿瘤科接受门诊治疗的患者的446名主要护理人员进行的。数据是通过面对面访谈的方式收集的,包括社会人口调查问卷、癌症恐惧量表、反思思维风格量表和对癌症筛查态度量表的简短形式。结果显示,对癌症的恐惧与反思思想之间存在适度的、正的、有统计学意义的关联(r = 0.543, p < 0.001)。层次回归分析显示,对癌症的恐惧解释了19.3%的癌症筛查态度方差(R2 = 0.193),当考虑反思思想时,解释方差增加到22.4% (R2 = 0.224)。这两个变量被确定为对癌症筛查态度的显著和负向预测因子(p < 0.001)。这表明反刍思维部分介导了癌症恐惧与癌症筛查态度之间的关系(间接效应= -0.106,95% bootstrap CI[- 0.171, -0.056])。这些结果表明,对癌症的恐惧和反思思想构成了显著的心理障碍,对癌症患者的护理态度产生负面影响。这强调了护理提供者针对这些心理障碍制定干预措施的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers related to all areas of the science and practice of psychologists in medical settings. Manuscripts are chosen that have a broad appeal across psychology as well as other health care disciplines, reflecting varying backgrounds, interests, and specializations. The journal publishes original research, treatment outcome trials, meta-analyses, literature reviews, conceptual papers, brief scientific reports, and scholarly case studies. Papers accepted address clinical matters in medical settings; integrated care; health disparities; education and training of the future psychology workforce; interdisciplinary collaboration, training, and professionalism; licensing, credentialing, and privileging in hospital practice; research and practice ethics; professional development of psychologists in academic health centers; professional practice matters in medical settings; and cultural, economic, political, regulatory, and systems factors in health care. In summary, the journal provides a forum for papers predicted to have significant theoretical or practical importance for the application of psychology in medical settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书