Platelet-Rich plasma for adhesive capsulitis: An umbrella review of effects on pain, function, and range of motion.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Fanny Johnsson Öman, Bengt Månsson, Jenny Viklund, Flávio Fidêncio De Lima, Maria Christidis, Giancarlo De La Torre Canales, Nikolaos Christidis
{"title":"Platelet-Rich plasma for adhesive capsulitis: An umbrella review of effects on pain, function, and range of motion.","authors":"Fanny Johnsson Öman, Bengt Månsson, Jenny Viklund, Flávio Fidêncio De Lima, Maria Christidis, Giancarlo De La Torre Canales, Nikolaos Christidis","doi":"10.1177/10538127261489859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAdhesive capsulitis is a common and disabling shoulder condition with substantial impact on pain and function, yet the role of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections remains uncertain.ObjectiveThis umbrella review aimed to synthesize the evidence on the effects of PRP on pain, shoulder range of motion, and function in adults with adhesive capsulitis.MethodsA search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL was conducted from inception to June 2025. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included and appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute umbrella review methodology, and only reviews meeting predefined methodological quality criteria were included in the synthesis. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251024935).ResultsSix systematic reviews meeting the predefined critical methodological criteria were included. Across reviews, PRP was generally associated with greater improvements in pain, shoulder range of motion, and functional outcomes at intermediate- and long-term follow-up compared with control treatments. In contrast, short-term outcomes were generally comparable between PRP and control treatments. Reported adverse events were infrequent and typically mild and transient.ConclusionPRP appears to be associated with beneficial effects at intermediate and longer follow-up compared with commonly used interventions. However, the overall strength of evidence remains limited by heterogeneity in PRP protocols, comparator interventions, and outcome reporting, while incomplete and variable reporting of adverse events precludes firm conclusions regarding safety. These findings suggest that PRP may represent a adjunct treatment-option in adhesive capsulitis when longer-term outcomes are prioritized, although standardization of PRP protocols and further high-quality research are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10538127261489859"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127261489859","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundAdhesive capsulitis is a common and disabling shoulder condition with substantial impact on pain and function, yet the role of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections remains uncertain.ObjectiveThis umbrella review aimed to synthesize the evidence on the effects of PRP on pain, shoulder range of motion, and function in adults with adhesive capsulitis.MethodsA search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL was conducted from inception to June 2025. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included and appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute umbrella review methodology, and only reviews meeting predefined methodological quality criteria were included in the synthesis. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251024935).ResultsSix systematic reviews meeting the predefined critical methodological criteria were included. Across reviews, PRP was generally associated with greater improvements in pain, shoulder range of motion, and functional outcomes at intermediate- and long-term follow-up compared with control treatments. In contrast, short-term outcomes were generally comparable between PRP and control treatments. Reported adverse events were infrequent and typically mild and transient.ConclusionPRP appears to be associated with beneficial effects at intermediate and longer follow-up compared with commonly used interventions. However, the overall strength of evidence remains limited by heterogeneity in PRP protocols, comparator interventions, and outcome reporting, while incomplete and variable reporting of adverse events precludes firm conclusions regarding safety. These findings suggest that PRP may represent a adjunct treatment-option in adhesive capsulitis when longer-term outcomes are prioritized, although standardization of PRP protocols and further high-quality research are needed.

富血小板血浆治疗粘连性囊炎:对疼痛、功能和活动范围影响的综述。
背景:囊性粘连性肩周炎是一种常见的致残性肩周炎,对疼痛和功能有重大影响,但富血小板血浆(PRP)注射的作用仍不确定。目的综述PRP对成人粘连性囊炎患者疼痛、肩关节活动度和功能的影响。方法检索MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、CINAHL等数据库,检索时间为建站至2025年6月。纳入系统评价和荟萃分析,并使用Joanna Briggs研究所的综合评价方法进行评价,只有符合预先定义的方法学质量标准的评价才被纳入综合评价。该综述已在PROSPERO注册(CRD420251024935)。结果纳入6篇符合预定关键方法学标准的系统评价。在回顾中,与对照治疗相比,在中期和长期随访中,PRP通常与疼痛、肩部活动范围和功能结果的改善有更大的关系。相比之下,PRP和对照治疗之间的短期结果通常是相似的。报道的不良事件并不常见,通常是轻微和短暂的。结论与常用干预措施相比,prp在中期和较长时间随访中具有良好的效果。然而,证据的总体强度仍然受到PRP方案、比较干预措施和结果报告的异质性的限制,而不良事件的不完整和可变报告妨碍了关于安全性的确切结论。这些发现表明,当优先考虑长期结果时,PRP可能是粘连性胶囊炎的辅助治疗选择,尽管需要标准化PRP方案和进一步的高质量研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书