A Structured Two-Phase Workflow for Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: A 24-Case Consecutive Feasibility Series.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Yun Seok Yang, Jinyu Lee, Seong Hee Kim, Chul Kwon Lim, Jae Young Kwack, Jun-Hyeok Kang, Kwan Young Oh
{"title":"A Structured Two-Phase Workflow for Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: A 24-Case Consecutive Feasibility Series.","authors":"Yun Seok Yang, Jinyu Lee, Seong Hee Kim, Chul Kwon Lim, Jae Young Kwack, Jun-Hyeok Kang, Kwan Young Oh","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2026.09.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objective: </strong>To describe the feasibility, perioperative outcomes, and short-term follow-up of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) sacrocolpopexy performed with a structured two-phase workflow.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective consecutive case series.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single tertiary academic institution.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Twenty-four consecutive intended vNOTES-SC/RvNOTES-SC cases in a selective single-surgeon program for stage II-IV apical prolapse (April 2019-December 2025).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The operation was organized into an endoscopic phase (presacral dissection, retroperitoneal tunneling, sacral fixation of the Y-mesh long arm, and peritonealization) and a direct-vision vaginal phase (vaginal-wall preparation, short-arm fixation, and cuff closure); robotic assistance, when used, was confined to the endoscopic phase. The first 10 cases used a previous multi-phase technique and the subsequent 14 the structured two-phase workflow.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Sacrocolpopexy was completed in 23 of 24 patients (one intraoperative conversion). Over a median follow-up of 12.2 months (range 5.9-83.9), no mesh-related complications, recurrences, or reoperations for prolapse occurred. One patient had vaginal cuff inflammation (resolved with oral antibiotics; Clavien-Dindo grade II) and two had mild stress urinary incontinence managed conservatively. Total operative time was shorter in the later period (138.1 ± 19.3 vs 190.0 ± 25.6 minutes), but because the periods were chronological this could not be separated from a learning-curve effect or increasing robotic use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>vNOTES sacrocolpopexy with a structured two-phase workflow was feasible, with a low complication profile and no mesh-related complications during short-term follow-up. Comparative effectiveness and long-term outcomes require prospective study; operative-time findings are hypothesis-generating.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2026.09.013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objective: To describe the feasibility, perioperative outcomes, and short-term follow-up of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) sacrocolpopexy performed with a structured two-phase workflow.

Design: Retrospective consecutive case series.

Setting: Single tertiary academic institution.

Participants: Twenty-four consecutive intended vNOTES-SC/RvNOTES-SC cases in a selective single-surgeon program for stage II-IV apical prolapse (April 2019-December 2025).

Interventions: The operation was organized into an endoscopic phase (presacral dissection, retroperitoneal tunneling, sacral fixation of the Y-mesh long arm, and peritonealization) and a direct-vision vaginal phase (vaginal-wall preparation, short-arm fixation, and cuff closure); robotic assistance, when used, was confined to the endoscopic phase. The first 10 cases used a previous multi-phase technique and the subsequent 14 the structured two-phase workflow.

Measurements and main results: Sacrocolpopexy was completed in 23 of 24 patients (one intraoperative conversion). Over a median follow-up of 12.2 months (range 5.9-83.9), no mesh-related complications, recurrences, or reoperations for prolapse occurred. One patient had vaginal cuff inflammation (resolved with oral antibiotics; Clavien-Dindo grade II) and two had mild stress urinary incontinence managed conservatively. Total operative time was shorter in the later period (138.1 ± 19.3 vs 190.0 ± 25.6 minutes), but because the periods were chronological this could not be separated from a learning-curve effect or increasing robotic use.

Conclusion: vNOTES sacrocolpopexy with a structured two-phase workflow was feasible, with a low complication profile and no mesh-related complications during short-term follow-up. Comparative effectiveness and long-term outcomes require prospective study; operative-time findings are hypothesis-generating.

经阴道自然孔腔内窥镜骶colpop固定术的结构化两阶段工作流程:24例连续可行性研究。
研究目的:描述经阴道自然孔腔内窥镜手术(vNOTES)的可行性、围手术期结果和短期随访,该手术采用结构化的两阶段工作流程。设计:回顾性连续病例系列。环境:单一高等院校。参与者:在选择性单外科治疗II-IV期根尖脱垂的项目中,连续24例vNOTES-SC/RvNOTES-SC病例(2019年4月- 2025年12月)。干预措施:手术分为内镜阶段(骶前剥离、腹膜后隧道、y网长臂骶骨固定和腹膜化)和阴道直视阶段(阴道壁准备、短臂固定和袖带闭合);当使用机器人辅助时,仅限于内窥镜阶段。前10个案例使用了之前的多阶段技术,随后的14个案例使用了结构化的两阶段工作流。测量和主要结果:24例患者中有23例完成骶髋固定术(1例术中转换)。中位随访时间为12.2个月(范围5.9-83.9),无网状物相关并发症、复发或脱垂再手术发生。1例患者有阴道袖口炎症(口服抗生素解决;Clavien-Dindo II级),2例患者有轻度应激性尿失禁。总手术时间在后期较短(138.1±19.3 vs 190.0±25.6分钟),但由于时间是按时间顺序排列的,这不能与学习曲线效应或机器人使用的增加分开。结论:采用结构化的两阶段工作流程的vNOTES骶colpop固定术是可行的,在短期随访中并发症发生率低,无网格相关并发症。比较有效性和长期结果需要前瞻性研究;手术时的发现是一种假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
272
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书