The role of 6-minute walk test and pulmonary function testing in patients with post COVID-19 condition: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jana Khawandi, Khushi Patel, Muayad Azzam, Jamil Nazzal, Grace Y Lam, Aseel Al Khader, Hassan Kawtharany, Mohammad Amin Al Zabibi, Jood Ahmad, Husam Kivan, Sahar Al Hussein, Aqeeb Ur Rehman, Alain Piché, Andrea Vasquez Camargo, Candace McNaughton, Gavin Y Oudit, Rejina Kamrul, Samia Afzal, Holger Schunemann, Wojtek Wiercioch, Robby Nieuwlaat, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, Emilia Liana Falcone, Reem A Mustafa
{"title":"The role of 6-minute walk test and pulmonary function testing in patients with post COVID-19 condition: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Jana Khawandi, Khushi Patel, Muayad Azzam, Jamil Nazzal, Grace Y Lam, Aseel Al Khader, Hassan Kawtharany, Mohammad Amin Al Zabibi, Jood Ahmad, Husam Kivan, Sahar Al Hussein, Aqeeb Ur Rehman, Alain Piché, Andrea Vasquez Camargo, Candace McNaughton, Gavin Y Oudit, Rejina Kamrul, Samia Afzal, Holger Schunemann, Wojtek Wiercioch, Robby Nieuwlaat, Romina Brignardello-Petersen, Emilia Liana Falcone, Reem A Mustafa","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmag074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) is a complication of acute COVID-19 infection, which often presents with respiratory symptoms. This review aimed to assess the prevalence of abnormal pulmonary function test (PFTs) and 6-minute walk test (6MWT) with oximetry findings, and their respective prevalence and magnitude of abnormalities in patients with PCC, compared to patients without PCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched three databases. Two reviewers independently screened articles using LASER Al and extracted relevant data using a piloted Excel sheet. We performed meta-analysis using OpenMeta and RevManWeb and a subgroup analysis based on patients' settings during acute COVID-19. We assessed the risk of bias using the Hoy et al. tool and the certainty using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 30 studies that reported on the prevalence of abnormal PFTs and/or 6MWT in patients with PCC. Outcomes within PFTs and 6MWT showed that patients with PCC have a higher probability of having abnormal tests, with those hospitalized during their acute COVID-19 infection showing a higher probability of having abnormal tests. The overall certainty of the evidence was very low due to the high risk of bias, indirectness, and imprecision.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review provides insight into the utilization of PFTs and 6MWT and the frequency of test abnormalities in patients with PCC. Despite existing evidence, there is a need for future studies to assess the diagnostic test accuracy of these tests in PCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":"43 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13595279/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmag074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) is a complication of acute COVID-19 infection, which often presents with respiratory symptoms. This review aimed to assess the prevalence of abnormal pulmonary function test (PFTs) and 6-minute walk test (6MWT) with oximetry findings, and their respective prevalence and magnitude of abnormalities in patients with PCC, compared to patients without PCC.

Methods: We searched three databases. Two reviewers independently screened articles using LASER Al and extracted relevant data using a piloted Excel sheet. We performed meta-analysis using OpenMeta and RevManWeb and a subgroup analysis based on patients' settings during acute COVID-19. We assessed the risk of bias using the Hoy et al. tool and the certainty using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

Results: We included 30 studies that reported on the prevalence of abnormal PFTs and/or 6MWT in patients with PCC. Outcomes within PFTs and 6MWT showed that patients with PCC have a higher probability of having abnormal tests, with those hospitalized during their acute COVID-19 infection showing a higher probability of having abnormal tests. The overall certainty of the evidence was very low due to the high risk of bias, indirectness, and imprecision.

Conclusion: This review provides insight into the utilization of PFTs and 6MWT and the frequency of test abnormalities in patients with PCC. Despite existing evidence, there is a need for future studies to assess the diagnostic test accuracy of these tests in PCC.

6分钟步行测试和肺功能测试在COVID-19后患者中的作用:系统综述和荟萃分析
背景与目的:PCC是急性COVID-19感染的并发症,通常表现为呼吸道症状。本综述旨在评估含血氧测定结果的异常肺功能试验(pft)和6分钟步行试验(6MWT)的患病率,以及PCC患者与无PCC患者相比各自的患病率和异常程度。方法:检索三个数据库。两位审稿人使用LASER Al独立筛选文章,并使用试点Excel表格提取相关数据。我们使用OpenMeta和RevManWeb进行了荟萃分析,并基于急性COVID-19患者的环境进行了亚组分析。我们使用Hoy等人的工具评估偏倚风险,使用分级推荐评估、发展和评估(GRADE)方法评估确定性。结果:我们纳入了30项研究,报道了PCC患者中pft和/或6MWT的异常发生率。pft和6MWT内的结果显示,PCC患者检测异常的可能性更高,急性COVID-19感染期间住院的患者检测异常的可能性更高。由于偏倚、间接和不精确的高风险,证据的总体确定性非常低。结论:本文综述了PFTs和6MWT在PCC患者中的应用以及检测异常的频率。尽管已有证据,但仍需要进一步的研究来评估这些检测在PCC中的诊断准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family practice
Family practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries. Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration. The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书