What Factors Are Associated With Clinically Meaningful Improvements After Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy?

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Chandler A Sparks, Samuel P Alfonsi, Ty L Monty, Benjamin Kerzner, Guillaume Girardot, Shane J Nho, Joel C Williams
{"title":"What Factors Are Associated With Clinically Meaningful Improvements After Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy?","authors":"Chandler A Sparks, Samuel P Alfonsi, Ty L Monty, Benjamin Kerzner, Guillaume Girardot, Shane J Nho, Joel C Williams","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000004117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) quantify symptoms and function, but the degree to which a patient considers an improvement or outcome after surgery to be meaningful can be difficult to quantify. Benchmarking improvement using metrics like the minimum clinically important difference (MCID), patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) can help clinicians know what outcome or how large of an improvement is large enough to matter clinically and to their patients. Yet, procedure-specific thresholds for Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) remain poorly defined, and factors associated with clinically meaningful outcome achievement have yet to be identified.</p><p><strong>Questions/purposes: </strong>For patients who underwent PAO, we sought to: (1) determine the MCID, PASS, and SCB absolute thresholds for the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) and the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12); (2) determine the proportion of patients achieving the MCID, PASS, and SCB across individual PROMs as well as for any PROM (that is, ≥ 1 PROM); and (3) identify patient factors that are independently associated with clinically meaningful outcome achievement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent a Bernese PAO between June 2020 and December 2024 performed by a single surgeon were identified through a longitudinally maintained institutional hip preservation repository. During the study period, 162 patients had a PAO. A total of 7% of those (12 of 162) were excluded because they underwent unplanned reoperation; of the 150 who remained, 11% (17 of 150) were lost to follow-up before 1 year, leaving 82% (133 of 162) for final analysis with ≥ 1 postoperative PROM at a minimum of 1-year follow-up. The included patient population had a mean ± SD age of 24 ± 8 years, 94% (125 of 133) were women, most reported being physically active (51% [68 of 133]), and most underwent the PAO with a concomitant procedure, with staged hip arthroscopy being the most common (67% [89 of 133]). The MCID thresholds were established using the distribution method, whereas PASS and SCB absolute thresholds were calculated using the anchor question-based method. The proportion of patients achieving the MCID, PASS, and SCB for individual PROMs as well as for any PROM (that is, ≥ 1 PROM) was recorded. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with achieving the MCID, PASS, and SCB for any PROM. To determine the MCID, PASS, and SCB absolute thresholds for the HOOS and iHOT-12, thresholds were calculated as follows, respectively: HOOS symptoms (12, 62, 78), HOOS pain (12, 79, 80), HOOS activities of daily living (12, 83, 92), HOOS sports and recreation (16, 57, 72), HOOS quality of life (14, 61, 65), and iHOT-12 (16, 75, 77).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When evaluating the proportion of patients achieving these thresholds across individual and combined metrics, we found that the MCID was achieved by 61% (62 of 102) to 73% (74 of 102) of patients for individual PROMs, with 83% (101 of 122) achieving it for at least one measure. The proportion of PASS achievement ranged from 52% (65 of 125) to 73% (85 of 117) across PROMs, with 77% (103 of 133) overall. The SCB achievement proportion was 47% (55 of 117) to 55% (64 of 117) per PROM and 70% (93 of 133) overall. With respect to identifying independent patient factors associated with clinically meaningful outcome achievement, a preoperative pathologic gait was independently associated with MCID achievement (OR 5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3 to 33.6]; p = 0.046). Preoperative symptom duration > 2 years (OR 0.3 [95% CI 0.1 to 0.9]; p = 0.048) and femoral antetorsion > 25° (OR 0.2 [95% CI 0.1 to 0.9]; p = 0.03) were associated with lower odds of PASS achievement. Preoperative symptom duration > 2 years also was associated with lower odds of SCB achievement in a negative fashion (OR 0.4 [95% CI 0.2 to 0.9]; p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study defined MCID, PASS, and SCB thresholds for the HOOS and iHOT-12 after Bernese PAO, demonstrating that while the majority of patients achieve these benchmarks, a notable subset fall short of a satisfactory outcome. We identified specific patient factors, including preoperative symptom duration > 2 years and femoral antetorsion > 25°, that negatively impact clinically meaningful outcome achievement. These findings highlight chronicity and complex structural anatomy as markers of more advanced condition that may limit the efficacy of Bernese PAO. Surgeons should be cognizant of these factors and utilize them during preoperative counseling. Ultimately, these procedure-specific thresholds offer a more practical approach than raw outcome scores alone to improve risk stratification and track clinical success. Future studies are needed to validate these thresholds across larger, diverse populations, evaluate additional PROMs, establish anchor question-based thresholds for MCID, and determine the long-term durability of achieving these clinically meaningful outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, therapeutic study.</p>","PeriodicalId":10404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000004117","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) quantify symptoms and function, but the degree to which a patient considers an improvement or outcome after surgery to be meaningful can be difficult to quantify. Benchmarking improvement using metrics like the minimum clinically important difference (MCID), patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) can help clinicians know what outcome or how large of an improvement is large enough to matter clinically and to their patients. Yet, procedure-specific thresholds for Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) remain poorly defined, and factors associated with clinically meaningful outcome achievement have yet to be identified.

Questions/purposes: For patients who underwent PAO, we sought to: (1) determine the MCID, PASS, and SCB absolute thresholds for the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) and the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12); (2) determine the proportion of patients achieving the MCID, PASS, and SCB across individual PROMs as well as for any PROM (that is, ≥ 1 PROM); and (3) identify patient factors that are independently associated with clinically meaningful outcome achievement.

Methods: Patients who underwent a Bernese PAO between June 2020 and December 2024 performed by a single surgeon were identified through a longitudinally maintained institutional hip preservation repository. During the study period, 162 patients had a PAO. A total of 7% of those (12 of 162) were excluded because they underwent unplanned reoperation; of the 150 who remained, 11% (17 of 150) were lost to follow-up before 1 year, leaving 82% (133 of 162) for final analysis with ≥ 1 postoperative PROM at a minimum of 1-year follow-up. The included patient population had a mean ± SD age of 24 ± 8 years, 94% (125 of 133) were women, most reported being physically active (51% [68 of 133]), and most underwent the PAO with a concomitant procedure, with staged hip arthroscopy being the most common (67% [89 of 133]). The MCID thresholds were established using the distribution method, whereas PASS and SCB absolute thresholds were calculated using the anchor question-based method. The proportion of patients achieving the MCID, PASS, and SCB for individual PROMs as well as for any PROM (that is, ≥ 1 PROM) was recorded. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with achieving the MCID, PASS, and SCB for any PROM. To determine the MCID, PASS, and SCB absolute thresholds for the HOOS and iHOT-12, thresholds were calculated as follows, respectively: HOOS symptoms (12, 62, 78), HOOS pain (12, 79, 80), HOOS activities of daily living (12, 83, 92), HOOS sports and recreation (16, 57, 72), HOOS quality of life (14, 61, 65), and iHOT-12 (16, 75, 77).

Results: When evaluating the proportion of patients achieving these thresholds across individual and combined metrics, we found that the MCID was achieved by 61% (62 of 102) to 73% (74 of 102) of patients for individual PROMs, with 83% (101 of 122) achieving it for at least one measure. The proportion of PASS achievement ranged from 52% (65 of 125) to 73% (85 of 117) across PROMs, with 77% (103 of 133) overall. The SCB achievement proportion was 47% (55 of 117) to 55% (64 of 117) per PROM and 70% (93 of 133) overall. With respect to identifying independent patient factors associated with clinically meaningful outcome achievement, a preoperative pathologic gait was independently associated with MCID achievement (OR 5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3 to 33.6]; p = 0.046). Preoperative symptom duration > 2 years (OR 0.3 [95% CI 0.1 to 0.9]; p = 0.048) and femoral antetorsion > 25° (OR 0.2 [95% CI 0.1 to 0.9]; p = 0.03) were associated with lower odds of PASS achievement. Preoperative symptom duration > 2 years also was associated with lower odds of SCB achievement in a negative fashion (OR 0.4 [95% CI 0.2 to 0.9]; p = 0.04).

Conclusion: The present study defined MCID, PASS, and SCB thresholds for the HOOS and iHOT-12 after Bernese PAO, demonstrating that while the majority of patients achieve these benchmarks, a notable subset fall short of a satisfactory outcome. We identified specific patient factors, including preoperative symptom duration > 2 years and femoral antetorsion > 25°, that negatively impact clinically meaningful outcome achievement. These findings highlight chronicity and complex structural anatomy as markers of more advanced condition that may limit the efficacy of Bernese PAO. Surgeons should be cognizant of these factors and utilize them during preoperative counseling. Ultimately, these procedure-specific thresholds offer a more practical approach than raw outcome scores alone to improve risk stratification and track clinical success. Future studies are needed to validate these thresholds across larger, diverse populations, evaluate additional PROMs, establish anchor question-based thresholds for MCID, and determine the long-term durability of achieving these clinically meaningful outcomes.

Level of evidence: Level III, therapeutic study.

哪些因素与伯尔尼髋臼周围截骨术后临床有意义的改善相关?
背景:患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)量化了症状和功能,但患者认为术后改善或结果有意义的程度很难量化。使用最小临床重要差异(MCID)、患者可接受症状状态(PASS)和实质性临床获益(SCB)等指标对改善进行基准测试,可以帮助临床医生了解什么结果或多大程度的改善足以影响临床和患者。然而,伯尔尼髋臼周围截骨术(PAO)的手术特异性阈值仍然定义不清,与临床有意义的结果成就相关的因素尚未确定。问题/目的:对于接受PAO的患者,我们试图:(1)确定髋关节残疾和骨关节炎结局评分(HOOS)和12项国际髋关节结局工具(iHOT-12)的MCID、PASS和SCB绝对阈值;(2)确定个体PROM以及任何PROM(即≥1个PROM)中达到MCID、PASS和SCB的患者比例;(3)确定与临床有意义的结局实现独立相关的患者因素。方法:通过纵向维护的机构髋关节保存库对2020年6月至2024年12月期间由单一外科医生进行Bernese PAO的患者进行鉴定。在研究期间,162名患者出现PAO。162例患者中有12例(7%)因非计划再手术而被排除;在剩下的150人中,11%(150人中有17人)在1年前失去随访,82%(162人中有133人)在至少1年的随访中最终分析为术后≥1例胎膜早破。纳入的患者群体的平均±SD年龄为24±8岁,94%(133人中125人)为女性,大多数报告有身体活动(51%[133人中68人]),大多数接受PAO合并手术,分阶段髋关节镜检查是最常见的(67%[133人中89人])。采用分布法确定MCID阈值,采用基于锚点问题的方法计算PASS和SCB绝对阈值。记录单个PROM以及任何PROM(即≥1个PROM)达到MCID、PASS和SCB的患者比例。逐步多元逻辑回归用于识别与实现任何PROM的MCID, PASS和SCB独立相关的因素。为了确定HOOS和iHOT-12的MCID、PASS和SCB绝对阈值,分别计算阈值如下:HOOS症状(12、62、78)、HOOS疼痛(12、79、80)、HOOS日常生活活动(12、83、92)、HOOS运动和娱乐(16、57、72)、HOOS生活质量(14、61、65)和iHOT-12(16、75、77)。结果:当评估个体和联合指标中达到这些阈值的患者比例时,我们发现个体PROMs患者中达到MCID的比例为61%(102人中62人)至73%(102人中74人),其中83%(122人中101人)至少达到一项指标。通过考试的比例从52%(125人中的65人)到73%(117人中的85人)不等,总体为77%(133人中的103人)。每个毕业舞会的SCB成绩比例为47%(117人中的55人)至55%(117人中的64人),总体为70%(133人中的93人)。在确定与临床有意义的结局实现相关的独立患者因素方面,术前病理步态与MCID实现独立相关(OR 5[95%可信区间(CI) 1.3至33.6];P = 0.046)。术前症状持续时间> 2年(OR 0.3 [95% CI 0.1至0.9];p = 0.048)和股前旋> 25°(OR 0.2 [95% CI 0.1至0.9];p = 0.03)与较低的PASS发生率相关。术前症状持续时间bbb2年也与较低的阴性SCB实现几率相关(OR 0.4 [95% CI 0.2至0.9];p = 0.04)。结论:本研究定义了Bernese PAO后HOOS和iHOT-12的MCID、PASS和SCB阈值,表明虽然大多数患者达到了这些基准,但有一部分患者没有达到令人满意的结果。我们确定了特定的患者因素,包括术前症状持续时间bbbb2年和股前旋bbbb25°,这些因素对临床有意义的结果产生负面影响。这些发现强调了慢性和复杂的结构解剖作为晚期疾病的标志,可能会限制伯尔尼PAO的疗效。外科医生应认识到这些因素,并在术前咨询中加以利用。最终,这些特定程序的阈值提供了一个比单独的原始结果评分更实用的方法来改善风险分层和跟踪临床成功。 未来的研究需要在更大、更多样化的人群中验证这些阈值,评估额外的prom,建立基于锚定问题的MCID阈值,并确定实现这些有临床意义的结果的长期持久性。证据等级:III级,治疗性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.90%
发文量
722
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® is a leading peer-reviewed journal devoted to the dissemination of new and important orthopaedic knowledge. CORR® brings readers the latest clinical and basic research, along with columns, commentaries, and interviews with authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书