Utility and best practices for clinical diagnostic testing of the autonomic nervous system: A Consensus Statement Endorsed by the American Autonomic Society and the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine.

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Melissa M Cortez, Glen Cook, Mitchell G Miglis, Satish R Raj, Nathaniel M Robbins, Wolfgang Singer, David M Sletten, Amro M Stino, Steven Vernino
{"title":"Utility and best practices for clinical diagnostic testing of the autonomic nervous system: A Consensus Statement Endorsed by the American Autonomic Society and the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine.","authors":"Melissa M Cortez, Glen Cook, Mitchell G Miglis, Satish R Raj, Nathaniel M Robbins, Wolfgang Singer, David M Sletten, Amro M Stino, Steven Vernino","doi":"10.1007/s10286-026-01238-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Disorders of the autonomic nervous system are prevalent and associated with substantial morbidity, mortality and diagnostic delay. Standardized, laboratory-based autonomic function testing provides objective physiological data essential for diagnosing, staging, and monitoring autonomic disorders, yet no current consensus statement establishes best practices for the conduct, interpretation, and minimum quality standards of such testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The American Autonomic Society convened a writing committee of autonomic specialists to review published evidence and established practices governing standardized autonomic reflex function testing in clinical settings. This consensus statement builds upon prior position statements published by North American and European professional societies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We summarize the clinical evidence supporting standardized autonomic reflex function testing across a broad range of conditions, including neurodegenerative disorders, peripheral neuropathies, orthostatic intolerance syndromes, and autoimmune autonomic disorders. We describe the validated battery of tests -orthostatic challenge, Valsalva maneuver, cardiovagal heart rate variability testing, and sudomotor testing-with attention to physiological principles, technical standards, and clinical interpretation. Minimum standards are defined for the requisite roles in autonomic testing: the autonomic technician, supervising clinician, and interpreting autonomic physician. Special considerations for pediatric, pregnant, and critically ill populations are addressed, and emerging adjunctive techniques are reviewed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Standardized autonomic reflex function testing is clinically useful, well validated, evidence-based, and non-investigational when performed by qualified personnel adhering to best practices. Autonomic testing is irreplaceable for clinical decision-making in certain circumstances and should be integrated into clinical practice when appropriate.</p>","PeriodicalId":10168,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Autonomic Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Autonomic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-026-01238-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Disorders of the autonomic nervous system are prevalent and associated with substantial morbidity, mortality and diagnostic delay. Standardized, laboratory-based autonomic function testing provides objective physiological data essential for diagnosing, staging, and monitoring autonomic disorders, yet no current consensus statement establishes best practices for the conduct, interpretation, and minimum quality standards of such testing.

Methods: The American Autonomic Society convened a writing committee of autonomic specialists to review published evidence and established practices governing standardized autonomic reflex function testing in clinical settings. This consensus statement builds upon prior position statements published by North American and European professional societies.

Results: We summarize the clinical evidence supporting standardized autonomic reflex function testing across a broad range of conditions, including neurodegenerative disorders, peripheral neuropathies, orthostatic intolerance syndromes, and autoimmune autonomic disorders. We describe the validated battery of tests -orthostatic challenge, Valsalva maneuver, cardiovagal heart rate variability testing, and sudomotor testing-with attention to physiological principles, technical standards, and clinical interpretation. Minimum standards are defined for the requisite roles in autonomic testing: the autonomic technician, supervising clinician, and interpreting autonomic physician. Special considerations for pediatric, pregnant, and critically ill populations are addressed, and emerging adjunctive techniques are reviewed.

Conclusion: Standardized autonomic reflex function testing is clinically useful, well validated, evidence-based, and non-investigational when performed by qualified personnel adhering to best practices. Autonomic testing is irreplaceable for clinical decision-making in certain circumstances and should be integrated into clinical practice when appropriate.

自主神经系统临床诊断测试的效用和最佳实践:美国自主神经学会和美国神经肌肉与电诊断医学协会认可的共识声明。
目的:自主神经系统疾病是普遍存在的,并与大量的发病率,死亡率和诊断延迟相关。标准化的、基于实验室的自主神经功能检测为自主神经疾病的诊断、分期和监测提供了客观的生理数据,但目前还没有共识声明为此类检测的实施、解释和最低质量标准建立最佳实践。方法:美国自主神经学会召集了一个由自主神经专家组成的写作委员会,审查已发表的证据和临床环境中标准化自主神经反射功能测试的既定实践。这一共识声明建立在北美和欧洲专业协会先前发表的立场声明的基础上。结果:我们总结了支持标准化自主反射功能测试的临床证据,包括神经退行性疾病、周围神经病变、直立性不耐受综合征和自身免疫性自主神经疾病。我们描述了经过验证的一系列测试-直立挑战,Valsalva机动,心血管心率变异性测试和sudomotor测试-注意生理原理,技术标准和临床解释。为自主神经测试中必要的角色定义了最低标准:自主神经技术人员、监督临床医生和解释自主神经医生。对儿科、孕妇和危重患者的特殊考虑进行了讨论,并对新兴的辅助技术进行了审查。结论:标准化的自主反射功能测试在临床上是有用的,经过良好的验证,基于证据,并且当由合格的人员坚持最佳实践时,是非研究性的。在某些情况下,自主测试对于临床决策是不可替代的,在适当的时候应该纳入临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Autonomic Research
Clinical Autonomic Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Autonomic Research aims to draw together and disseminate research work from various disciplines and specialties dealing with clinical problems resulting from autonomic dysfunction. Areas to be covered include: cardiovascular system, neurology, diabetes, endocrinology, urology, pain disorders, ophthalmology, gastroenterology, toxicology and clinical pharmacology, skin infectious diseases, renal disease. This journal is an essential source of new information for everyone working in areas involving the autonomic nervous system. A major feature of Clinical Autonomic Research is its speed of publication coupled with the highest refereeing standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书