Lung Density: A Computed Tomography Marker for Severity in Pulmonary Hypertension of Various Etiologies.

IF 2.4 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Serhii Progonov, Olena Torbas, Bogdan Batsak
{"title":"Lung Density: A Computed Tomography Marker for Severity in Pulmonary Hypertension of Various Etiologies.","authors":"Serhii Progonov, Olena Torbas, Bogdan Batsak","doi":"10.2174/011573403X475339260903094116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To investigate the capabilities of CT markers for assessing the severity of PH and to compare them with PFT and gas exchange parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center study evaluated 90 consecutive Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) patients across five diagnostic subgroups (idiopathic, connective tissue disease, congenital heart disease, left heart disease, and chronic thromboembolic). Baseline diagnostics included comprehensive clinical, functional, and invasive right heart catheterization. Automated non-contrast chest CT densitometry via the Siemens Syngo.via (VB80B) workstation extracted volumetric parenchymal metrics: Mean Lung Density (MLD), Percentile 75, and High Attenuation Volume (HAV). Statistical robustness was verified using 1000-resample percentile bootstrap simulations, followed by multi-parameter ROC analysis to determine the diagnostic accuracy of CT-AI metrics in identifying severe pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR > 5 Wood units).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In bootstrap-validated multivariable regression models, right atrium area emerged as an independent predictor for both MLD (β = 2.02, 95% CI: 0.21-3.83, p = 0.030) and Percentile 75 (β = 2.19, 95% CI: 0.21-4.17, p = 0.031), while forced vital capacity independently predicted High Attenuation Volume (HAV; β = -0.031, 95% CI: -0.053- -0.009, p = 0.007). ROC curve analysis demonstrated modest but consistent diagnostic performance of non-contrast CT-AI metrics in discriminating severe PVR (>5 Wood units), led by MLD (AUC = 0.686, 95% CI: 0.511-0.860; candidate threshold > -785 HU) and closely mirrored by Percentile 75 (AUC = 0.680) and HAV (AUC = 0.680).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The established associations between AI-driven lung density, right atrial remodeling, and spirometric volumes reflect descriptive cross-sectional associations that may parallel underlying macro-structural changes. Furthermore, automated density profiling provides an objective, observer-independent tool to capture mosaic parenchymal alterations, serving strictly as an exploratory adjunct for preliminary phenotype characterization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Automated non-contrast CT-AI densitometric metrics consistently discriminate severe PVR (>5 Wood units), led by MLD (AUC = 0.686; threshold -785HU), serving as potential exploratory screening indicators that reflect underlying cardiopulmonary alterations. They do not replace established clinical tools but offer potential value for opportunistic screening, warranting further prospective multi-center and prognostic validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10832,"journal":{"name":"Current Cardiology Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Cardiology Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/011573403X475339260903094116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To investigate the capabilities of CT markers for assessing the severity of PH and to compare them with PFT and gas exchange parameters.

Methods: This single-center study evaluated 90 consecutive Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) patients across five diagnostic subgroups (idiopathic, connective tissue disease, congenital heart disease, left heart disease, and chronic thromboembolic). Baseline diagnostics included comprehensive clinical, functional, and invasive right heart catheterization. Automated non-contrast chest CT densitometry via the Siemens Syngo.via (VB80B) workstation extracted volumetric parenchymal metrics: Mean Lung Density (MLD), Percentile 75, and High Attenuation Volume (HAV). Statistical robustness was verified using 1000-resample percentile bootstrap simulations, followed by multi-parameter ROC analysis to determine the diagnostic accuracy of CT-AI metrics in identifying severe pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR > 5 Wood units).

Results: In bootstrap-validated multivariable regression models, right atrium area emerged as an independent predictor for both MLD (β = 2.02, 95% CI: 0.21-3.83, p = 0.030) and Percentile 75 (β = 2.19, 95% CI: 0.21-4.17, p = 0.031), while forced vital capacity independently predicted High Attenuation Volume (HAV; β = -0.031, 95% CI: -0.053- -0.009, p = 0.007). ROC curve analysis demonstrated modest but consistent diagnostic performance of non-contrast CT-AI metrics in discriminating severe PVR (>5 Wood units), led by MLD (AUC = 0.686, 95% CI: 0.511-0.860; candidate threshold > -785 HU) and closely mirrored by Percentile 75 (AUC = 0.680) and HAV (AUC = 0.680).

Discussion: The established associations between AI-driven lung density, right atrial remodeling, and spirometric volumes reflect descriptive cross-sectional associations that may parallel underlying macro-structural changes. Furthermore, automated density profiling provides an objective, observer-independent tool to capture mosaic parenchymal alterations, serving strictly as an exploratory adjunct for preliminary phenotype characterization.

Conclusion: Automated non-contrast CT-AI densitometric metrics consistently discriminate severe PVR (>5 Wood units), led by MLD (AUC = 0.686; threshold -785HU), serving as potential exploratory screening indicators that reflect underlying cardiopulmonary alterations. They do not replace established clinical tools but offer potential value for opportunistic screening, warranting further prospective multi-center and prognostic validation.

肺密度:不同病因肺动脉高压严重程度的计算机断层扫描标记。
前言:研究CT标记物评估PH严重程度的能力,并将其与PFT和气体交换参数进行比较。方法:这项单中心研究评估了90例连续肺动脉高压(PH)患者,分为5个诊断亚组(特发性、结缔组织疾病、先天性心脏病、左心疾病和慢性血栓栓塞)。基线诊断包括全面的临床、功能和侵入性右心导管。通过西门子Syngo进行自动胸部非对比CT密度测量。通过(VB80B)工作站提取体积实质指标:平均肺密度(MLD),百分位数75和高衰减体积(HAV)。通过1000个样本的百分比自举模拟验证了统计稳健性,随后进行多参数ROC分析,以确定CT-AI指标在识别严重肺血管阻力(PVR bbb50 Wood单位)方面的诊断准确性。结果:在bootstrap验证的多变量回归模型中,右心房面积成为MLD (β = 2.02, 95% CI: 0.21-3.83, p = 0.030)和百分位75 (β = 2.19, 95% CI: 0.21-4.17, p = 0.031)的独立预测因子,而强制肺活量独立预测高衰减体积(HAV; β = -0.031, 95% CI: -0.053- -0.009, p = 0.007)。ROC曲线分析显示,非对比CT-AI指标在区分严重PVR (bbb50 Wood单位)方面的诊断表现一般但一致,以MLD (AUC = 0.686, 95% CI: 0.511-0.860;候选阈值> -785 HU)为首,并与75分位数(AUC = 0.680)和HAV (AUC = 0.680)密切相关。讨论:人工智能驱动的肺密度、右心房重构和肺活量之间的既定关联反映了描述性的横断面关联,可能与潜在的宏观结构变化平行。此外,自动密度谱提供了一个客观的、独立于观察者的工具来捕捉马赛克实质改变,严格地作为初步表型表征的探索性辅助手段。结论:自动非造影剂CT-AI密度测量指标一致地区分严重PVR (bbb50 Wood单位),以MLD为首(AUC = 0.686;阈值-785HU),可作为反映潜在心肺改变的潜在探索性筛查指标。它们不能取代现有的临床工具,但为机会性筛查提供了潜在价值,需要进一步的前瞻性多中心和预后验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Cardiology Reviews
Current Cardiology Reviews CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
117
期刊介绍: Current Cardiology Reviews publishes frontier reviews of high quality on all the latest advances on the practical and clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. All relevant areas are covered by the journal including arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, congenital heart disease, drugs, methodology, pacing, and preventive cardiology. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians in cardiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书