Walking football for people with chronic breathlessness: A mixed-methods proof of concept study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Chronic Respiratory Disease Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-21 DOI:10.1177/14799731261489273
Callum Bradford, Kirsti J Loughran, Benjamin Harrison, Grant McGeechan, Denis Martin, Sophie Suri, Noelle Robertson, Gaynor Williams, Tim Rapley, Samantha L Harrison
{"title":"Walking football for people with chronic breathlessness: A mixed-methods proof of concept study.","authors":"Callum Bradford, Kirsti J Loughran, Benjamin Harrison, Grant McGeechan, Denis Martin, Sophie Suri, Noelle Robertson, Gaynor Williams, Tim Rapley, Samantha L Harrison","doi":"10.1177/14799731261489273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionPulmonary rehabilitation (PR) provides substantial benefits, but these are rarely sustained. Walking football (WF), with its slower pace and widespread availability, may offer an exercise-maintenance option. This proof-of-concept study aimed to understand the potential of WF as an exercise-maintenance intervention following PR.MethodsA mixed-methods, prospective observational design was used. Patients completing PR at two NHS trusts were invited to attend weekly 2-hour WF sessions for 6 weeks. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment, adherence, and safety. An ethnographic approach observed participant experiences and engagement. Health outcomes were assessed at baseline and post-intervention, and the intensity of a single WF session was analysed.Results160 individuals were approached; 36 expressed interest and 6 enrolled (5 male; mean age 71 years). Travel difficulties were the most common reason for declining. Five participants attended at least 4 sessions, and all continued WF after the study. One minor, unrelated adverse event occurred. Qualitative analysis of 18-hours of observations and 6 interviews generated 6 themes. The most notable finding highlighted the importance of WF sessions being exclusive to people with breathlessness. At least 3 participants achieved the minimal clinically important difference in functional exercise capacity, strength, health-related quality of life, and symptom burden. During a single session, group mean heart rate reached 66% of estimated HRmax, with a mean distance of 3.23 km covered.ConclusionsWF appears to be a promising, engaging, and potentially sustainable exercise-maintenance option following PR, though travel barriers limited uptake. Future interventions should prioritise accessible locations and consider transport support.</p>","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"23 ","pages":"14799731261489273"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14799731261489273","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionPulmonary rehabilitation (PR) provides substantial benefits, but these are rarely sustained. Walking football (WF), with its slower pace and widespread availability, may offer an exercise-maintenance option. This proof-of-concept study aimed to understand the potential of WF as an exercise-maintenance intervention following PR.MethodsA mixed-methods, prospective observational design was used. Patients completing PR at two NHS trusts were invited to attend weekly 2-hour WF sessions for 6 weeks. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment, adherence, and safety. An ethnographic approach observed participant experiences and engagement. Health outcomes were assessed at baseline and post-intervention, and the intensity of a single WF session was analysed.Results160 individuals were approached; 36 expressed interest and 6 enrolled (5 male; mean age 71 years). Travel difficulties were the most common reason for declining. Five participants attended at least 4 sessions, and all continued WF after the study. One minor, unrelated adverse event occurred. Qualitative analysis of 18-hours of observations and 6 interviews generated 6 themes. The most notable finding highlighted the importance of WF sessions being exclusive to people with breathlessness. At least 3 participants achieved the minimal clinically important difference in functional exercise capacity, strength, health-related quality of life, and symptom burden. During a single session, group mean heart rate reached 66% of estimated HRmax, with a mean distance of 3.23 km covered.ConclusionsWF appears to be a promising, engaging, and potentially sustainable exercise-maintenance option following PR, though travel barriers limited uptake. Future interventions should prioritise accessible locations and consider transport support.

慢性呼吸困难患者的步行足球:一项混合方法的概念验证研究。
肺康复(PR)提供了实质性的益处,但这些益处很少持续。步行足球(WF),由于其速度较慢和广泛的可用性,可能提供了一种锻炼维持的选择。这项概念验证研究旨在了解WF作为pr后运动维持干预的潜力。方法采用混合方法,前瞻性观察设计。在两个NHS信托机构完成PR的患者被邀请参加为期6周的每周2小时的WF会议。可行性结果包括招募、依从性和安全性。人种学方法观察参与者的经历和参与。在基线和干预后评估了健康结果,并分析了单次WF会议的强度。结果共接触了160人;36人表示有兴趣,6人报名(5名男性,平均年龄71岁)。出行困难是人数减少的最常见原因。5名参与者参加了至少4次疗程,并在研究结束后继续WF。发生了一个轻微的、不相关的不良事件。对18个小时的观察和6次访谈进行定性分析,得出6个主题。最值得注意的发现强调了世界卫生组织会议只针对呼吸困难患者的重要性。至少有3名受试者在功能性运动能力、力量、健康相关生活质量和症状负担方面达到最小的临床重要差异。在单次训练中,组平均心率达到估计HRmax的66%,平均距离为3.23公里。结论swf似乎是PR后一种有前途的、有吸引力的、潜在可持续的运动维持选择,尽管旅行障碍限制了它的应用。未来的干预措施应优先考虑无障碍地点,并考虑交通支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chronic Respiratory Disease
Chronic Respiratory Disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Chronic Respiratory Disease is a peer-reviewed, open access, scholarly journal, created in response to the rising incidence of chronic respiratory diseases worldwide. It publishes high quality research papers and original articles that have immediate relevance to clinical practice and its multi-disciplinary perspective reflects the nature of modern treatment. The journal provides a high quality, multi-disciplinary focus for the publication of original papers, reviews and commentary in the broad area of chronic respiratory disease, particularly its treatment and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书