Comprehensive detection of ricin following oral exposure: feces as the key diagnostic matrix.

IF 10.9 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY
Shivani Dixit, Ram Kumar Dhaked, Anjali Yadav, Jagrati Parashar, Nandita Saxena
{"title":"Comprehensive detection of ricin following oral exposure: feces as the key diagnostic matrix.","authors":"Shivani Dixit, Ram Kumar Dhaked, Anjali Yadav, Jagrati Parashar, Nandita Saxena","doi":"10.1007/s00204-026-04535-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ricin is classified as a Schedule 1 toxin under the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) and Category B agent under the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC). Its extreme toxicity, lack of an antidote, and potential for deliberate misuse necessitate rapid detection strategies for effective medical and public health responses. However, information on optimal biological matrices and detection windows following ingestion remains limited. This study evaluated optimal biosamples and detection strategies following oral ricin exposure in mice. Crude and purified ricin were isolated from castor seeds and characterized by SDS-PAGE. Following oral LD<sub>50</sub> determination, mice were administered 5 × LD<sub>50</sub> doses to simulate severe poisoning. Feces, urine, serum, and liver samples were collected at 2, 4, 8, and 18 h post-exposure. Detection was performed using in-house lateral flow assay (LFA), sandwich ELISA, and immunoblotting, with selected samples validated by cytotoxicity assays and LC-MS/MS to confirm toxin integrity and activity. Feces offered the broadest diagnostic window, with biologically active ricin detected at all time points. Urine contained lower toxin levels but consistently enabled detection, supporting its utility as a non-invasive matrix. Serum ricin was transient, peaking at 2-4 h and often required enrichment to overcome matrix interference. Conversely, liver samples exhibited progressive toxin accumulation, peaking at 18 h, emphasizing their forensic value. These findings delineate ricin toxicokinetics following oral exposure and establish feces as the most reliable matrix for sustained detection. By integrating LFA with confirmatory immunoassays, this study provides a practical framework for early identification and public health preparedness in ricin exposure scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":8329,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-026-04535-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ricin is classified as a Schedule 1 toxin under the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) and Category B agent under the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC). Its extreme toxicity, lack of an antidote, and potential for deliberate misuse necessitate rapid detection strategies for effective medical and public health responses. However, information on optimal biological matrices and detection windows following ingestion remains limited. This study evaluated optimal biosamples and detection strategies following oral ricin exposure in mice. Crude and purified ricin were isolated from castor seeds and characterized by SDS-PAGE. Following oral LD50 determination, mice were administered 5 × LD50 doses to simulate severe poisoning. Feces, urine, serum, and liver samples were collected at 2, 4, 8, and 18 h post-exposure. Detection was performed using in-house lateral flow assay (LFA), sandwich ELISA, and immunoblotting, with selected samples validated by cytotoxicity assays and LC-MS/MS to confirm toxin integrity and activity. Feces offered the broadest diagnostic window, with biologically active ricin detected at all time points. Urine contained lower toxin levels but consistently enabled detection, supporting its utility as a non-invasive matrix. Serum ricin was transient, peaking at 2-4 h and often required enrichment to overcome matrix interference. Conversely, liver samples exhibited progressive toxin accumulation, peaking at 18 h, emphasizing their forensic value. These findings delineate ricin toxicokinetics following oral exposure and establish feces as the most reliable matrix for sustained detection. By integrating LFA with confirmatory immunoassays, this study provides a practical framework for early identification and public health preparedness in ricin exposure scenarios.

口腔接触后蓖麻毒素的综合检测:粪便为关键诊断基质。
根据《化学武器公约》,蓖麻毒素被列为附表1毒素,而根据《生物和毒素武器公约》,蓖麻毒素被列为B类药剂。它的毒性极大,缺乏解毒剂,并可能被故意误用,因此有必要采取快速检测战略,以采取有效的医疗和公共卫生对策。然而,关于最佳生物基质和摄入后的检测窗口的信息仍然有限。本研究评估了小鼠口服蓖麻毒素暴露后的最佳生物样本和检测策略。从蓖麻种子中分离得到粗蓖麻毒素和纯化蓖麻毒素,并用SDS-PAGE进行了鉴定。测定小鼠口服LD50后,给予5 × LD50剂量模拟严重中毒。暴露后2、4、8和18小时收集粪便、尿液、血清和肝脏样本。检测采用内部横向流动试验(LFA)、夹心ELISA和免疫印迹法,并通过细胞毒性试验和LC-MS/MS验证所选样品,以确认毒素的完整性和活性。粪便提供了最广泛的诊断窗口,在所有时间点都检测到生物活性蓖麻毒素。尿液含有较低的毒素水平,但始终能够检测,支持其作为非侵入性基质的效用。血清蓖麻毒素是短暂的,在2-4小时达到峰值,通常需要富集以克服基质干扰。相反,肝脏样品表现出渐进的毒素积累,在18小时达到峰值,强调了它们的法医价值。这些发现描述了口服暴露后蓖麻毒素的毒性动力学,并确定粪便是持续检测的最可靠的基质。通过将LFA与确认性免疫测定相结合,本研究为蓖麻毒素暴露情景的早期识别和公共卫生准备提供了一个实用框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Toxicology
Archives of Toxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
218
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Archives of Toxicology provides up-to-date information on the latest advances in toxicology. The journal places particular emphasis on studies relating to defined effects of chemicals and mechanisms of toxicity, including toxic activities at the molecular level, in humans and experimental animals. Coverage includes new insights into analysis and toxicokinetics and into forensic toxicology. Review articles of general interest to toxicologists are an additional important feature of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书