In-Person Versus Telemedicine for Medication Adherence in Hepatitis C.

IF 2
Shlomit Yaron, Ronen Arbel, Yafa Ashur, Talish Razi
{"title":"In-Person Versus Telemedicine for Medication Adherence in Hepatitis C.","authors":"Shlomit Yaron, Ronen Arbel, Yafa Ashur, Talish Razi","doi":"10.1177/15305627261490791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) cure more than 95% of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections, shifting the principal barrier to elimination from drug efficacy to patient engagement and adherence. Telemedicine is generally non-inferior to in-person care for HCV management, but most evidence treats care modalities as mutually exclusive and does not address how their integration in routine practice affects treatment completion. The objective or this work was to evaluate the association between care-modality patterns: in-person only, telemedicine only, or hybrid, and DAA medication adherence among adults treated for HCV in routine care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults with HCV treated with DAAs between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2024 within Clalit Health Services. Patients were classified by care pathway as in-person, telemedicine, or hybrid. The primary outcome was completion of a full DAA treatment course based on pharmacy dispensing records. Associations were estimated with multivariable logistic regression adjusted for sex, age group, population sector, and drug-abuse diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 7,295 patients analyzed (36% in-person only, 7.6% telemedicine only, 56% hybrid), overall treatment completion was 69%: 64% with in-person care, 61% with telemedicine, and 74% with hybrid care. In adjusted analyses, telemedicine alone was similar to in-person care (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-1.13, <i>p</i> = 0.4). Hybrid care was independently associated with higher completion than in-person care (aOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.50-1.86, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hybrid care pathways were independently associated with substantially higher DAA completion than either in-person or telemedicine alone. Telemedicine on its own conferred no measurable advantage. HCV elimination programs should embed structured hybrid pathways and pair them with targeted adherence support for older patients and patients with drug-use disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":520784,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":" ","pages":"15305627261490791"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15305627261490791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) cure more than 95% of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections, shifting the principal barrier to elimination from drug efficacy to patient engagement and adherence. Telemedicine is generally non-inferior to in-person care for HCV management, but most evidence treats care modalities as mutually exclusive and does not address how their integration in routine practice affects treatment completion. The objective or this work was to evaluate the association between care-modality patterns: in-person only, telemedicine only, or hybrid, and DAA medication adherence among adults treated for HCV in routine care.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults with HCV treated with DAAs between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2024 within Clalit Health Services. Patients were classified by care pathway as in-person, telemedicine, or hybrid. The primary outcome was completion of a full DAA treatment course based on pharmacy dispensing records. Associations were estimated with multivariable logistic regression adjusted for sex, age group, population sector, and drug-abuse diagnosis.

Results: Of 7,295 patients analyzed (36% in-person only, 7.6% telemedicine only, 56% hybrid), overall treatment completion was 69%: 64% with in-person care, 61% with telemedicine, and 74% with hybrid care. In adjusted analyses, telemedicine alone was similar to in-person care (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-1.13, p = 0.4). Hybrid care was independently associated with higher completion than in-person care (aOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.50-1.86, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Hybrid care pathways were independently associated with substantially higher DAA completion than either in-person or telemedicine alone. Telemedicine on its own conferred no measurable advantage. HCV elimination programs should embed structured hybrid pathways and pair them with targeted adherence support for older patients and patients with drug-use disorders.

丙型肝炎患者服药依从性的面对面与远程医疗对比。
背景:直接作用抗病毒药物(DAAs)治愈了95%以上的丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染,将消除药物疗效的主要障碍转变为患者参与和依从性。在HCV管理方面,远程医疗通常不逊于现场护理,但大多数证据认为护理模式是相互排斥的,并没有说明它们在日常实践中的整合如何影响治疗的完成。这项工作的目的是评估在常规护理中接受HCV治疗的成人中,护理模式(仅面对面、仅远程医疗或混合)与DAA药物依从性之间的关系。方法:我们对2015年1月1日至2024年12月31日在Clalit Health Services内接受DAAs治疗的HCV成人患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。患者按护理途径分为面对面、远程医疗或混合治疗。主要结局是根据药房配药记录完成完整的DAA疗程。通过调整性别、年龄组、人口部门和药物滥用诊断的多变量logistic回归来估计相关性。结果:在分析的7295例患者中(36%仅面对面治疗,7.6%仅远程医疗,56%混合治疗),总体治疗完成率为69%:面对面护理为64%,远程医疗为61%,混合护理为74%。在校正分析中,单独远程医疗与现场护理相似(校正优势比[aOR] 0.93, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.77-1.13, p = 0.4)。混合护理的完成率高于面对面护理(aOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.50-1.86, p < 0.001)。结论:与单独面对面或远程医疗相比,混合护理途径与更高的DAA完成率独立相关。远程医疗本身没有可衡量的优势。HCV消除项目应嵌入结构化的混合途径,并将其与针对老年患者和药物使用障碍患者的靶向依从性支持相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书