Sustainable quality improvement interventions to ensure adequate physician documentation of chaperone presence in breast clinic: a multicycle clinical audit.

IF 2.2
Cian M Hehir, Gavin G Calpin, Nadia Walsh, Gordon R Daly, Gavin P Dowling, Sandra Hembrecht, Katie Kearns, Michael Allen, Abeeda Butt, Colm Power, Arnold D K Hill
{"title":"Sustainable quality improvement interventions to ensure adequate physician documentation of chaperone presence in breast clinic: a multicycle clinical audit.","authors":"Cian M Hehir, Gavin G Calpin, Nadia Walsh, Gordon R Daly, Gavin P Dowling, Sandra Hembrecht, Katie Kearns, Michael Allen, Abeeda Butt, Colm Power, Arnold D K Hill","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzag141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Current best practice guidelines recommend chaperone presence during intimate clinical examination. Achieving guideline standards of documentation regarding chaperone presence has important implications from both clinical governance and medicolegal perspectives. This multicycle clinical audit provides insight into quality improvement interventions relevant to chaperone utilization and achieving guideline documentation standards.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This single-centre, multicycle quality improvement audit was performed in the setting of a tertiary breast referral clinic at Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. The quality improvement audit consisted of three audit cycles with two distinct interventions employed. Firstly, a 'chaperone stamp' was entered into the clinical notes prior to consultation to serve as a memory aid for physicians. Secondly, following transfer of clinical notes from paper-based to electronic records, a mandatory check field was introduced ensuring adequate documentation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 388 female patients underwent breast examination at our centre. Despite levels of chaperone presence being directly observed at 100% in clinical consultations, chaperone documentation rates were poor (7.6%). Introduction of a chaperone stamp resulted in a 51.1% improvement in chaperone documentation. This intervention demonstrated poor sustainability as documentation standards declined by 13.6% at 6 months postintervention. Introduction of a mandatory check field using electronic patient records generated the most significant improvement in documentation standards, with 100% of clinical notes recording chaperone presence to reference standard.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Accurate documentation of chaperone presence or decline thereof is of relevance from clinical governance and medicolegal perspectives. Simple, resource-efficient interventions such as the 'chaperone stamp' demonstrate significant quality improvement potential but with questionable long-term efficacy. Electronic records present a viable opportunity for units to achieve guideline standards in a time and resource-efficient manner.</p>","PeriodicalId":520651,"journal":{"name":"International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13645422/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzag141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Current best practice guidelines recommend chaperone presence during intimate clinical examination. Achieving guideline standards of documentation regarding chaperone presence has important implications from both clinical governance and medicolegal perspectives. This multicycle clinical audit provides insight into quality improvement interventions relevant to chaperone utilization and achieving guideline documentation standards.

Materials and methods: This single-centre, multicycle quality improvement audit was performed in the setting of a tertiary breast referral clinic at Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. The quality improvement audit consisted of three audit cycles with two distinct interventions employed. Firstly, a 'chaperone stamp' was entered into the clinical notes prior to consultation to serve as a memory aid for physicians. Secondly, following transfer of clinical notes from paper-based to electronic records, a mandatory check field was introduced ensuring adequate documentation.

Results: A total of 388 female patients underwent breast examination at our centre. Despite levels of chaperone presence being directly observed at 100% in clinical consultations, chaperone documentation rates were poor (7.6%). Introduction of a chaperone stamp resulted in a 51.1% improvement in chaperone documentation. This intervention demonstrated poor sustainability as documentation standards declined by 13.6% at 6 months postintervention. Introduction of a mandatory check field using electronic patient records generated the most significant improvement in documentation standards, with 100% of clinical notes recording chaperone presence to reference standard.

Conclusion: Accurate documentation of chaperone presence or decline thereof is of relevance from clinical governance and medicolegal perspectives. Simple, resource-efficient interventions such as the 'chaperone stamp' demonstrate significant quality improvement potential but with questionable long-term efficacy. Electronic records present a viable opportunity for units to achieve guideline standards in a time and resource-efficient manner.

可持续的质量改进干预措施,以确保充分的文件陪伴存在乳腺诊所:多周期临床审计。
简介:目前的最佳实践指南建议在亲密的临床检查中陪同。从临床治理和医学法律的角度来看,实现关于伴侣存在的文件指导标准具有重要意义。这种多周期临床审计提供了与伴侣利用和实现指导文件标准相关的质量改进干预措施的见解。材料和方法:本单中心、多周期质量改进审计在爱尔兰都柏林博蒙特医院的三级乳腺转诊诊所进行。质量改进审计由三个审计周期组成,采用了两种不同的干预措施。首先,在会诊前,在临床记录中加入“伴侣印记”,作为医生的记忆辅助工具。其次,在临床记录从纸质转移到电子记录之后,引入了一个强制检查字段,以确保充分的文件。结果:共有388例女性患者在我中心接受乳腺检查。尽管在临床咨询中直接观察到陪同人员的存在率为100%,但陪同人员记录率很低(7.6%)。引入监护人印章导致监护人文件改善51.1%。干预后6个月,文件标准下降了13.6%,可持续性较差。引入使用电子病历的强制检查字段,对文档标准产生了最显著的改进,100%的临床笔记记录了陪同人员是否存在参考标准。结论:准确记录陪伴者的存在或减少,从临床治理和医学角度具有重要意义。简单、资源高效的干预措施,如“伴侣印章”,显示出显著的质量改善潜力,但长期效果令人怀疑。电子记录为单位提供了一个可行的机会,使其在时间和资源效率方面达到指导标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书