Compliance With the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist in the Operating Room at the National Referral Hospital, Bhutan: A Cross-Sectional Quality Assessment.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Karma Sherub, Yin M Than, Yeshey Dorjey, Tashi Norbu
{"title":"Compliance With the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist in the Operating Room at the National Referral Hospital, Bhutan: A Cross-Sectional Quality Assessment.","authors":"Karma Sherub, Yin M Than, Yeshey Dorjey, Tashi Norbu","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This quality assessment was conducted to determine the compliance rate of the modified WHO Surgical Safety Checklist at the National Referral Hospital, Bhutan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted as a quality improvement assessment in the Operating Room (OR) at the National Referral Hospital, Bhutan. All the elective surgical procedures performed under general and/or spinal anesthesia were included. Compliance with the Sign In, Time Out and Sign Out domains was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the Sign In domain, patient identity was confirmed in 76.4% of cases, and the anesthesia safety checklist was appropriately completed in 75.2% of procedures. In the Time Out domain, the status of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis was verbally confirmed in only half of the cases. In the Sign Out domain, correct counting of instruments and gauze and complete specimen labeling were ensured in merely one-fourth of the procedures (24.8%). The composite compliance rates for the surgical safety checklist domains were 46.4% for Sign In, 24.8% for Time Out, and 5.2% for Sign Out. Compliance varied significantly across checklist domains and surgical specialties. Compliance also declined significantly as checklist administration progressed, from 76.4% for the first item to 6.4% for the final item (r=-0.93, P<0.001). This decline in the Sign Out domain was consistent across surgical specialties (χ2=8.26, df=5, P=0.142).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The surgical safety checklist is underutilized, with overall compliance being low, particularly in the Sign Out domain, underscoring the need for targeted interventions to improve adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001593","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This quality assessment was conducted to determine the compliance rate of the modified WHO Surgical Safety Checklist at the National Referral Hospital, Bhutan.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted as a quality improvement assessment in the Operating Room (OR) at the National Referral Hospital, Bhutan. All the elective surgical procedures performed under general and/or spinal anesthesia were included. Compliance with the Sign In, Time Out and Sign Out domains was assessed.

Results: In the Sign In domain, patient identity was confirmed in 76.4% of cases, and the anesthesia safety checklist was appropriately completed in 75.2% of procedures. In the Time Out domain, the status of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis was verbally confirmed in only half of the cases. In the Sign Out domain, correct counting of instruments and gauze and complete specimen labeling were ensured in merely one-fourth of the procedures (24.8%). The composite compliance rates for the surgical safety checklist domains were 46.4% for Sign In, 24.8% for Time Out, and 5.2% for Sign Out. Compliance varied significantly across checklist domains and surgical specialties. Compliance also declined significantly as checklist administration progressed, from 76.4% for the first item to 6.4% for the final item (r=-0.93, P<0.001). This decline in the Sign Out domain was consistent across surgical specialties (χ2=8.26, df=5, P=0.142).

Conclusion: The surgical safety checklist is underutilized, with overall compliance being low, particularly in the Sign Out domain, underscoring the need for targeted interventions to improve adherence.

不丹国家转诊医院手术室对世界卫生组织手术安全检查表的遵守情况:横断面质量评估。
目的:本质量评估旨在确定不丹国家转诊医院修订的世卫组织手术安全检查表的遵守率。方法:在不丹国家转诊医院的手术室(OR)进行了一项横断面研究,作为质量改进评估。所有在全身麻醉和/或脊髓麻醉下进行的选择性外科手术包括在内。对登录、超时和注销域的合规性进行了评估。结果:在Sign In域中,76.4%的病例确认了患者身份,75.2%的手术正确完成了麻醉安全检查表。在超时域,术前抗生素预防状态口头确认在只有一半的情况下。在签出领域,只有四分之一的程序(24.8%)确保了仪器和纱布的正确计数和完整的标本标记。手术安全检查表域的综合符合率为:签到46.4%,超时24.8%,签到5.2%。依从性在检查表领域和外科专科之间有显著差异。随着检查表使用的进展,依从性也显著下降,从第一项的76.4%降至最后一项的6.4% (r=-0.93)。结论:手术安全检查表未得到充分利用,总体依从性较低,特别是在Sign Out领域,强调需要有针对性的干预措施来提高依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书