Lorel Mureșan, Dionisio Franco Barattini, Laura Simona Ianoși, Carlo Signorini, Rawia Harb
{"title":"A Silver-Zeolite Spray Powder for Pressure Ulcers and Minor Burns: Real-World Evidence from Primary Care.","authors":"Lorel Mureșan, Dionisio Franco Barattini, Laura Simona Ianoși, Carlo Signorini, Rawia Harb","doi":"10.2147/MDER.S622994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pressure ulcers and minor burns are commonly managed in primary care. The tested device is an adsorbing spray powder combining ionic silver (2.5%) and micronized zeolite (97.5%), designed to provide exudate control and antimicrobial activity in a topical formulation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this multicenter, open-label, single-arm post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) study, adult outpatients with chronic stage II-III pressure ulcers (NPUAP) unhealed after ≥3 weeks of standard care, or with superficial/partial-thickness burns (<10% body surface area) within 48 hours of injury, received the tested product for 4 weeks. Co-primary endpoints were 4-week changes in PUSH (pressure ulcers) and Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS; burns) scores; secondary endpoints included pain (100-mm Visual Analog Scale), patient satisfaction, Investigator Global Assessment of Performance, and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-eight patients were enrolled and 56 analyzed per-protocol (32 burns, 24 pressure ulcers); two discontinued for reasons unrelated to safety. At Week 4, 96.4% (54/56) showed meaningful improvement and none worsened. Mean VSS decreased from 5.22±2.78 to 1.31±1.49 in burns (p<0.001; bias-corrected d_avg=1.72), and mean PUSH decreased from 11.67±2.41 to 3.29±1.60 in pressure ulcers (p<0.001; bias-corrected d_avg=4.01), with 95.8% of pressure-ulcer patients achieving a ≥5-point reduction. VAS pain decreased from Week 2 in both subgroups (p<0.001). At Week 4, the Investigator considered 68.8% of burns and 29.2% of pressure ulcers healed. Patient satisfaction was high (75.0% very satisfied, 25.0% satisfied); no adverse events, device effects or deficiencies were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this single-arm, real-world study, the tested device showed a favorable performance and safety signal in mild-to-moderate pressure ulcers and minor burns; given the non-comparative design, these findings do not establish equivalence or superiority to other silver-based dressings. Ease of use may support outpatient self-managed care; adequately powered randomized trials versus alternative silver-based dressings are warranted to confirm these findings.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05649332.</p>","PeriodicalId":47140,"journal":{"name":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","volume":"19 ","pages":"622994"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13589787/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S622994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Pressure ulcers and minor burns are commonly managed in primary care. The tested device is an adsorbing spray powder combining ionic silver (2.5%) and micronized zeolite (97.5%), designed to provide exudate control and antimicrobial activity in a topical formulation.
Materials and methods: In this multicenter, open-label, single-arm post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) study, adult outpatients with chronic stage II-III pressure ulcers (NPUAP) unhealed after ≥3 weeks of standard care, or with superficial/partial-thickness burns (<10% body surface area) within 48 hours of injury, received the tested product for 4 weeks. Co-primary endpoints were 4-week changes in PUSH (pressure ulcers) and Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS; burns) scores; secondary endpoints included pain (100-mm Visual Analog Scale), patient satisfaction, Investigator Global Assessment of Performance, and safety.
Results: Fifty-eight patients were enrolled and 56 analyzed per-protocol (32 burns, 24 pressure ulcers); two discontinued for reasons unrelated to safety. At Week 4, 96.4% (54/56) showed meaningful improvement and none worsened. Mean VSS decreased from 5.22±2.78 to 1.31±1.49 in burns (p<0.001; bias-corrected d_avg=1.72), and mean PUSH decreased from 11.67±2.41 to 3.29±1.60 in pressure ulcers (p<0.001; bias-corrected d_avg=4.01), with 95.8% of pressure-ulcer patients achieving a ≥5-point reduction. VAS pain decreased from Week 2 in both subgroups (p<0.001). At Week 4, the Investigator considered 68.8% of burns and 29.2% of pressure ulcers healed. Patient satisfaction was high (75.0% very satisfied, 25.0% satisfied); no adverse events, device effects or deficiencies were reported.
Conclusion: In this single-arm, real-world study, the tested device showed a favorable performance and safety signal in mild-to-moderate pressure ulcers and minor burns; given the non-comparative design, these findings do not establish equivalence or superiority to other silver-based dressings. Ease of use may support outpatient self-managed care; adequately powered randomized trials versus alternative silver-based dressings are warranted to confirm these findings.