A Silver-Zeolite Spray Powder for Pressure Ulcers and Minor Burns: Real-World Evidence from Primary Care.

IF 1.5 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research Pub Date : 2026-09-14 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/MDER.S622994
Lorel Mureșan, Dionisio Franco Barattini, Laura Simona Ianoși, Carlo Signorini, Rawia Harb
{"title":"A Silver-Zeolite Spray Powder for Pressure Ulcers and Minor Burns: Real-World Evidence from Primary Care.","authors":"Lorel Mureșan, Dionisio Franco Barattini, Laura Simona Ianoși, Carlo Signorini, Rawia Harb","doi":"10.2147/MDER.S622994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pressure ulcers and minor burns are commonly managed in primary care. The tested device is an adsorbing spray powder combining ionic silver (2.5%) and micronized zeolite (97.5%), designed to provide exudate control and antimicrobial activity in a topical formulation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this multicenter, open-label, single-arm post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) study, adult outpatients with chronic stage II-III pressure ulcers (NPUAP) unhealed after ≥3 weeks of standard care, or with superficial/partial-thickness burns (<10% body surface area) within 48 hours of injury, received the tested product for 4 weeks. Co-primary endpoints were 4-week changes in PUSH (pressure ulcers) and Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS; burns) scores; secondary endpoints included pain (100-mm Visual Analog Scale), patient satisfaction, Investigator Global Assessment of Performance, and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-eight patients were enrolled and 56 analyzed per-protocol (32 burns, 24 pressure ulcers); two discontinued for reasons unrelated to safety. At Week 4, 96.4% (54/56) showed meaningful improvement and none worsened. Mean VSS decreased from 5.22±2.78 to 1.31±1.49 in burns (p<0.001; bias-corrected d_avg=1.72), and mean PUSH decreased from 11.67±2.41 to 3.29±1.60 in pressure ulcers (p<0.001; bias-corrected d_avg=4.01), with 95.8% of pressure-ulcer patients achieving a ≥5-point reduction. VAS pain decreased from Week 2 in both subgroups (p<0.001). At Week 4, the Investigator considered 68.8% of burns and 29.2% of pressure ulcers healed. Patient satisfaction was high (75.0% very satisfied, 25.0% satisfied); no adverse events, device effects or deficiencies were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this single-arm, real-world study, the tested device showed a favorable performance and safety signal in mild-to-moderate pressure ulcers and minor burns; given the non-comparative design, these findings do not establish equivalence or superiority to other silver-based dressings. Ease of use may support outpatient self-managed care; adequately powered randomized trials versus alternative silver-based dressings are warranted to confirm these findings.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05649332.</p>","PeriodicalId":47140,"journal":{"name":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","volume":"19 ","pages":"622994"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13589787/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S622994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pressure ulcers and minor burns are commonly managed in primary care. The tested device is an adsorbing spray powder combining ionic silver (2.5%) and micronized zeolite (97.5%), designed to provide exudate control and antimicrobial activity in a topical formulation.

Materials and methods: In this multicenter, open-label, single-arm post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) study, adult outpatients with chronic stage II-III pressure ulcers (NPUAP) unhealed after ≥3 weeks of standard care, or with superficial/partial-thickness burns (<10% body surface area) within 48 hours of injury, received the tested product for 4 weeks. Co-primary endpoints were 4-week changes in PUSH (pressure ulcers) and Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS; burns) scores; secondary endpoints included pain (100-mm Visual Analog Scale), patient satisfaction, Investigator Global Assessment of Performance, and safety.

Results: Fifty-eight patients were enrolled and 56 analyzed per-protocol (32 burns, 24 pressure ulcers); two discontinued for reasons unrelated to safety. At Week 4, 96.4% (54/56) showed meaningful improvement and none worsened. Mean VSS decreased from 5.22±2.78 to 1.31±1.49 in burns (p<0.001; bias-corrected d_avg=1.72), and mean PUSH decreased from 11.67±2.41 to 3.29±1.60 in pressure ulcers (p<0.001; bias-corrected d_avg=4.01), with 95.8% of pressure-ulcer patients achieving a ≥5-point reduction. VAS pain decreased from Week 2 in both subgroups (p<0.001). At Week 4, the Investigator considered 68.8% of burns and 29.2% of pressure ulcers healed. Patient satisfaction was high (75.0% very satisfied, 25.0% satisfied); no adverse events, device effects or deficiencies were reported.

Conclusion: In this single-arm, real-world study, the tested device showed a favorable performance and safety signal in mild-to-moderate pressure ulcers and minor burns; given the non-comparative design, these findings do not establish equivalence or superiority to other silver-based dressings. Ease of use may support outpatient self-managed care; adequately powered randomized trials versus alternative silver-based dressings are warranted to confirm these findings.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05649332.

一种用于压疮和轻微烧伤的银沸石喷雾粉末:来自初级保健的真实世界证据。
背景:压疮和轻微烧伤通常在初级保健中处理。所测试的装置是一种结合离子银(2.5%)和微沸石(97.5%)的吸附喷雾粉末,设计用于在局部配方中提供渗出控制和抗菌活性。材料和方法:在这项多中心、开放标签、单臂上市后临床随访(PMCF)研究中,慢性II-III期压疮(NPUAP)在标准治疗≥3周后未愈合,或伴有浅表/部分厚度烧伤的成年门诊患者(结果:入组58例患者,按方案分析56例患者(32例烧伤,24例压疮);其中两项因与安全无关的原因停产。在第4周,96.4%(54/56)的患者表现出有意义的改善,没有患者恶化。烧伤的平均VSS从5.22±2.78下降到1.31±1.49。结论:在这项单臂、真实世界的研究中,测试设备在轻中度压疮和轻微烧伤中表现出良好的性能和安全信号,由于非比较设计,这些结果不能建立与其他银基敷料的等效性或优越性。易于使用可以支持门诊自我管理护理;充分有力的随机试验与替代银基敷料有必要证实这些发现。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05649332。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书