Passive leg raise as a noninvasive nursing intervention to predetermine fluid responsiveness in patients with sepsis in the emergency department: A comparative cohort study.
Janet Gregory, Catherine Restua, Marie Baumann, Mary Ann Esquela, Laura Gobeli, Vicki Harbeck, Lowine Sarbacker, Gregg Shoemaker, Tu Sibert, Charles Wellington, Shameya Ceasar, Jessica Peterson, Tajudaullah Bhaloo
{"title":"Passive leg raise as a noninvasive nursing intervention to predetermine fluid responsiveness in patients with sepsis in the emergency department: A comparative cohort study.","authors":"Janet Gregory, Catherine Restua, Marie Baumann, Mary Ann Esquela, Laura Gobeli, Vicki Harbeck, Lowine Sarbacker, Gregg Shoemaker, Tu Sibert, Charles Wellington, Shameya Ceasar, Jessica Peterson, Tajudaullah Bhaloo","doi":"10.1097/NSG.0000000000000468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis-related hypotension is treated by administration of intravenous fluids. Excess fluid volume can result in pulmonary edema and respiratory failure. Monitoring increases in patients' end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) in response to a passive leg raise (PLR) is a noninvasive method to evaluate fluid responsiveness.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the effectiveness of PLR and ETCO2 monitoring after initial fluid resuscitation among spontaneously breathing or intubated patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a quantitative comparative design, the study compared the total amount of fluid administered and outcomes between two cohorts of patients with sepsis in the emergency department (ED): the preintervention retrospective cohort (n = 259) who did not receive PLR, and the intervention prospective sample (n = 77) who received the PLR intervention. Supplementary analyses divided the intervention group into those who did (n = 28) and did not (n = 49) meet criteria for fluid responsiveness, comparing fluid administration totals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who received PLR had a higher total fluid volume administered than the preintervention group (P < .001). Tachycardia was more common in the preintervention group than in the intervention group (P < .001). Of the patients who received PLR, 64% were identified as negative fluid responders. These patients had lower mean total fluid administration, although the difference was not statistically significant (P = .06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that PLR can be instrumental in assessing fluid responsiveness among ED patients with sepsis who are spontaneously breathing or intubated.</p>","PeriodicalId":35641,"journal":{"name":"Nursing","volume":"56 10","pages":"46-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NSG.0000000000000468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Sepsis-related hypotension is treated by administration of intravenous fluids. Excess fluid volume can result in pulmonary edema and respiratory failure. Monitoring increases in patients' end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) in response to a passive leg raise (PLR) is a noninvasive method to evaluate fluid responsiveness.
Objective: To determine the effectiveness of PLR and ETCO2 monitoring after initial fluid resuscitation among spontaneously breathing or intubated patients with sepsis.
Methods: Using a quantitative comparative design, the study compared the total amount of fluid administered and outcomes between two cohorts of patients with sepsis in the emergency department (ED): the preintervention retrospective cohort (n = 259) who did not receive PLR, and the intervention prospective sample (n = 77) who received the PLR intervention. Supplementary analyses divided the intervention group into those who did (n = 28) and did not (n = 49) meet criteria for fluid responsiveness, comparing fluid administration totals.
Results: Patients who received PLR had a higher total fluid volume administered than the preintervention group (P < .001). Tachycardia was more common in the preintervention group than in the intervention group (P < .001). Of the patients who received PLR, 64% were identified as negative fluid responders. These patients had lower mean total fluid administration, although the difference was not statistically significant (P = .06).
Conclusion: This study demonstrates that PLR can be instrumental in assessing fluid responsiveness among ED patients with sepsis who are spontaneously breathing or intubated.
期刊介绍:
Nursing2020 (ISSN 0360-4039; online ISSN 1538-8689) published its first issue in November 1971, under founders Gene W. Jackson and Daniel Cheney. In the intervening years, its circulation has grown to over 150,000, making it one of the largest nursing journals in the world. Published monthly, Nursing2020 is widely regarded as offering current, practical contents to its readers, and has won many editorial awards testifying to the quality of its copy and graphics. The editorial and clinical staff, a 19-member Editorial Board of distinguished clinicians and practitioners, and over 100 invited reviewers help ensure the quality of this publication.