Passive leg raise as a noninvasive nursing intervention to predetermine fluid responsiveness in patients with sepsis in the emergency department: A comparative cohort study.

Q3 Nursing
Nursing Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-21 DOI:10.1097/NSG.0000000000000468
Janet Gregory, Catherine Restua, Marie Baumann, Mary Ann Esquela, Laura Gobeli, Vicki Harbeck, Lowine Sarbacker, Gregg Shoemaker, Tu Sibert, Charles Wellington, Shameya Ceasar, Jessica Peterson, Tajudaullah Bhaloo
{"title":"Passive leg raise as a noninvasive nursing intervention to predetermine fluid responsiveness in patients with sepsis in the emergency department: A comparative cohort study.","authors":"Janet Gregory, Catherine Restua, Marie Baumann, Mary Ann Esquela, Laura Gobeli, Vicki Harbeck, Lowine Sarbacker, Gregg Shoemaker, Tu Sibert, Charles Wellington, Shameya Ceasar, Jessica Peterson, Tajudaullah Bhaloo","doi":"10.1097/NSG.0000000000000468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis-related hypotension is treated by administration of intravenous fluids. Excess fluid volume can result in pulmonary edema and respiratory failure. Monitoring increases in patients' end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) in response to a passive leg raise (PLR) is a noninvasive method to evaluate fluid responsiveness.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the effectiveness of PLR and ETCO2 monitoring after initial fluid resuscitation among spontaneously breathing or intubated patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a quantitative comparative design, the study compared the total amount of fluid administered and outcomes between two cohorts of patients with sepsis in the emergency department (ED): the preintervention retrospective cohort (n = 259) who did not receive PLR, and the intervention prospective sample (n = 77) who received the PLR intervention. Supplementary analyses divided the intervention group into those who did (n = 28) and did not (n = 49) meet criteria for fluid responsiveness, comparing fluid administration totals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who received PLR had a higher total fluid volume administered than the preintervention group (P < .001). Tachycardia was more common in the preintervention group than in the intervention group (P < .001). Of the patients who received PLR, 64% were identified as negative fluid responders. These patients had lower mean total fluid administration, although the difference was not statistically significant (P = .06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that PLR can be instrumental in assessing fluid responsiveness among ED patients with sepsis who are spontaneously breathing or intubated.</p>","PeriodicalId":35641,"journal":{"name":"Nursing","volume":"56 10","pages":"46-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NSG.0000000000000468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sepsis-related hypotension is treated by administration of intravenous fluids. Excess fluid volume can result in pulmonary edema and respiratory failure. Monitoring increases in patients' end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) in response to a passive leg raise (PLR) is a noninvasive method to evaluate fluid responsiveness.

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of PLR and ETCO2 monitoring after initial fluid resuscitation among spontaneously breathing or intubated patients with sepsis.

Methods: Using a quantitative comparative design, the study compared the total amount of fluid administered and outcomes between two cohorts of patients with sepsis in the emergency department (ED): the preintervention retrospective cohort (n = 259) who did not receive PLR, and the intervention prospective sample (n = 77) who received the PLR intervention. Supplementary analyses divided the intervention group into those who did (n = 28) and did not (n = 49) meet criteria for fluid responsiveness, comparing fluid administration totals.

Results: Patients who received PLR had a higher total fluid volume administered than the preintervention group (P < .001). Tachycardia was more common in the preintervention group than in the intervention group (P < .001). Of the patients who received PLR, 64% were identified as negative fluid responders. These patients had lower mean total fluid administration, although the difference was not statistically significant (P = .06).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that PLR can be instrumental in assessing fluid responsiveness among ED patients with sepsis who are spontaneously breathing or intubated.

被动抬腿作为一种无创护理干预,预先确定急诊科脓毒症患者的液体反应性:一项比较队列研究
背景:脓毒症相关的低血压是通过静脉输液治疗的。体液过多会导致肺水肿和呼吸衰竭。监测被动抬腿(PLR)后患者潮末二氧化碳(ETCO2)的增加是一种评估液体反应性的无创方法。目的:探讨脓毒症患者首次液体复苏后PLR和ETCO2监测的有效性。方法:采用定量比较设计,比较急诊科(ED)脓毒症患者两组患者的总给液量和结局:干预前回顾性队列(n = 259)未接受PLR治疗,干预前瞻性队列(n = 77)接受PLR治疗。补充分析将干预组分为符合(n = 28)和不符合(n = 49)液体反应标准的组,比较液体给药总量。结果:与干预前组相比,接受PLR治疗的患者总液体容量更高(P < 0.001)。干预前组心动过速发生率高于干预组(P < 0.001)。在接受PLR的患者中,64%被确定为阴性液体反应。这些患者的平均总液体给药量较低,但差异无统计学意义(P = 0.06)。结论:本研究表明,PLR可用于评估脓毒症患者自发呼吸或插管时的液体反应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing
Nursing Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
338
期刊介绍: Nursing2020 (ISSN 0360-4039; online ISSN 1538-8689) published its first issue in November 1971, under founders Gene W. Jackson and Daniel Cheney. In the intervening years, its circulation has grown to over 150,000, making it one of the largest nursing journals in the world. Published monthly, Nursing2020 is widely regarded as offering current, practical contents to its readers, and has won many editorial awards testifying to the quality of its copy and graphics. The editorial and clinical staff, a 19-member Editorial Board of distinguished clinicians and practitioners, and over 100 invited reviewers help ensure the quality of this publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书