Optimizing Care Management Targeting: A Machine Learning Comparison of Regression, Classification, and Ranking Approaches for Identifying Future High-Cost Patients.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Chunhui Mo
{"title":"Optimizing Care Management Targeting: A Machine Learning Comparison of Regression, Classification, and Ranking Approaches for Identifying Future High-Cost Patients.","authors":"Chunhui Mo","doi":"10.1177/19427891261488894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective care management programs depend on accurately identifying patients who are likely to account for a disproportionate share of future health care expenditures. Unlike traditional risk-adjustment models, which emphasize population-level predictive accuracy, care management targeting is fundamentally a top-k decision problem focused on maximizing expenditure capture. This study used 2000-2023 MEPS data to compare regression-, classification-, and learning-to-rank machine learning approaches for predicting next-year health care expenditures. Primary outcomes included precision-at-k, cost capture-at-k, weighted cost capture-at-k, and AUC. Models were benchmarked against a persistence-based floor baseline using prior-year expenditures and an oracle upper bound representing perfect future information. Classification-based models consistently achieved the strongest operational targeting performance. Neural network and XGBoost classifiers outperformed regression and ranking approaches in identifying future high-cost individuals and maximizing expenditure capture. Differences in cost capture were statistically significant across yearly evaluations. More complex modeling extensions provided little additional benefit. Prior-year utilization and expenditure variables contributed substantially to predictive accuracy; however, models retained approximately 80%-90% of full-model performance after removal of these features, indicating meaningful predictive signal from sociodemographic characteristics, chronic disease burden, functional limitations, and self-reported health status. For care management programs operating under fixed enrollment constraints, classification-based prediction approaches appear better aligned with operational objectives than regression or ranking. Additional performance gains are more likely to arise from richer clinical and longitudinal data than from increased model complexity alone. Future AI-enabled care management systems may further improve resource allocation by integrating cost-risk prediction with estimates of patient engagement and intervention impactability.</p>","PeriodicalId":20396,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Management","volume":" ","pages":"19427891261488894"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19427891261488894","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective care management programs depend on accurately identifying patients who are likely to account for a disproportionate share of future health care expenditures. Unlike traditional risk-adjustment models, which emphasize population-level predictive accuracy, care management targeting is fundamentally a top-k decision problem focused on maximizing expenditure capture. This study used 2000-2023 MEPS data to compare regression-, classification-, and learning-to-rank machine learning approaches for predicting next-year health care expenditures. Primary outcomes included precision-at-k, cost capture-at-k, weighted cost capture-at-k, and AUC. Models were benchmarked against a persistence-based floor baseline using prior-year expenditures and an oracle upper bound representing perfect future information. Classification-based models consistently achieved the strongest operational targeting performance. Neural network and XGBoost classifiers outperformed regression and ranking approaches in identifying future high-cost individuals and maximizing expenditure capture. Differences in cost capture were statistically significant across yearly evaluations. More complex modeling extensions provided little additional benefit. Prior-year utilization and expenditure variables contributed substantially to predictive accuracy; however, models retained approximately 80%-90% of full-model performance after removal of these features, indicating meaningful predictive signal from sociodemographic characteristics, chronic disease burden, functional limitations, and self-reported health status. For care management programs operating under fixed enrollment constraints, classification-based prediction approaches appear better aligned with operational objectives than regression or ranking. Additional performance gains are more likely to arise from richer clinical and longitudinal data than from increased model complexity alone. Future AI-enabled care management systems may further improve resource allocation by integrating cost-risk prediction with estimates of patient engagement and intervention impactability.

优化护理管理目标:识别未来高成本患者的回归、分类和排名方法的机器学习比较。
有效的护理管理方案依赖于准确识别可能占未来医疗保健支出不成比例份额的患者。与强调人口水平预测准确性的传统风险调整模型不同,护理管理目标基本上是一个关注最大限度地获取支出的顶级决策问题。本研究使用2000-2023年MEPS数据,比较回归、分类和学习排序机器学习方法预测明年医疗保健支出。主要结果包括精度、成本捕获、加权成本捕获和AUC。使用上一年的支出和代表完美未来信息的oracle上限,对基于持久性的底层基线进行模型基准测试。基于分类的模型始终实现最强的操作目标性能。神经网络和XGBoost分类器在识别未来高成本个体和最大化支出捕获方面优于回归和排名方法。在年度评估中,成本捕获的差异在统计上是显著的。更复杂的建模扩展提供的额外好处很少。前一年的利用率和支出变量对预测准确性有很大贡献;然而,在去除这些特征后,模型保留了大约80%-90%的全模型性能,这表明社会人口统计学特征、慢性疾病负担、功能限制和自我报告的健康状况有意义的预测信号。对于在固定入组限制下运行的护理管理项目,基于分类的预测方法似乎比回归或排名更符合操作目标。更丰富的临床和纵向数据更有可能带来额外的性能提升,而不仅仅是模型复杂性的增加。未来的人工智能护理管理系统可以通过将成本风险预测与患者参与和干预影响的估计相结合,进一步改善资源分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Population Health Management
Population Health Management 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Population Health Management provides comprehensive, authoritative strategies for improving the systems and policies that affect health care quality, access, and outcomes, ultimately improving the health of an entire population. The Journal delivers essential research on a broad range of topics including the impact of social, cultural, economic, and environmental factors on health care systems and practices. Population Health Management coverage includes: Clinical case reports and studies on managing major public health conditions Compliance programs Health economics Outcomes assessment Provider incentives Health care reform Resource management Return on investment (ROI) Health care quality Care coordination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书