Short-Term Safety of Concomitant Meningococcal B and National Immunisation Program Vaccines in Infants Aged < 15 Months: A Survey-Based Surveillance Study.

IF 6.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Thuy Nguyen, Evelyn C S Tay, Michael Dymock, Thomas L Snelling, Lucy Dawes, Julie Marsh, Yue Wu, Alan Leeb, Nicholas Wood, Lucy Deng
{"title":"Short-Term Safety of Concomitant Meningococcal B and National Immunisation Program Vaccines in Infants Aged < 15 Months: A Survey-Based Surveillance Study.","authors":"Thuy Nguyen, Evelyn C S Tay, Michael Dymock, Thomas L Snelling, Lucy Dawes, Julie Marsh, Yue Wu, Alan Leeb, Nicholas Wood, Lucy Deng","doi":"10.5694/mja2.70297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine short-term safety outcomes following vaccination at 2-, 4-, 6- and 12-month timepoints, comparing infants receiving meningococcal B (MenB) vaccines concomitantly with National Immunisation Program (NIP) vaccines to those receiving vaccines at separate visits.</p><p><strong>Study type: </strong>Observational cohort survey study.</p><p><strong>Setting, participants: </strong>Online surveys via AusVaxSafety were sent 3 days post-immunisation to collect reports of adverse events following immunisation (AEFIs). Infants aged < 15 months were included if, between 1 April 2022 and 31 March 2025, they received NIP and MenB vaccines concomitantly or separately at schedule timepoints, and their carer completed an AusVaxSafety survey.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Bayesian multinomial logistic regression estimated the risk of reporting any AEFI, medical review and impact on daily activities following each vaccination strategy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 45,215 infants receiving NIP and MenB vaccines at the 2-, 4-, 6- and 12-month timepoints (with or without other vaccines), 72% (32,751/45,215) received concomitant vaccination. Excluding those with additional vaccines, 10,959 were included in the analysis. The adjusted model showed the cumulative risk of any AEFI was lower under the concomitant strategy compared with the separate strategy at 2 months (29% [95% credible interval (CrI), 26% to 31%] vs. 35% [95% CrI, 31% to 40%], risk difference -6.7 [95% CrI, -11.5 to -2.2]) and similar at 4 months (45% [95% CrI, 43% to 48%] vs. 47% [95% CrI, 43% to 52%]), 6 months (45% [95% CrI, 42% to 49%] vs. 44% [95% CrI, 38% to 50%]) and 12 months (47% [95% CrI, 45% to 50%] vs. 52% [95% CrI, 48% to 56%]). Medical review within 3 days was lower at 12 months in the concomitant group (4.1% [95% CrI, 3.4% to 5.0%] vs. separate 6.3% [95% CrI, 4.7% to 8.3%], risk difference -2.2 [-4.3 to -0.4]) and comparable across earlier time points (concomitant 2.3%-4.2% vs. separate 3.6%-3.9%). Impact on daily activities was low (concomitant 1.1%-8.5% vs. separate 1.6%-8.3%) with no differences observed between strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Separating MenB vaccines from routine NIP vaccines does not reduce, and may increase, the cumulative reaction burden across visits. Findings support concomitant administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":18214,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Australia","volume":"224 9","pages":"e70297"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13590206/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.70297","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine short-term safety outcomes following vaccination at 2-, 4-, 6- and 12-month timepoints, comparing infants receiving meningococcal B (MenB) vaccines concomitantly with National Immunisation Program (NIP) vaccines to those receiving vaccines at separate visits.

Study type: Observational cohort survey study.

Setting, participants: Online surveys via AusVaxSafety were sent 3 days post-immunisation to collect reports of adverse events following immunisation (AEFIs). Infants aged < 15 months were included if, between 1 April 2022 and 31 March 2025, they received NIP and MenB vaccines concomitantly or separately at schedule timepoints, and their carer completed an AusVaxSafety survey.

Main outcome measures: Bayesian multinomial logistic regression estimated the risk of reporting any AEFI, medical review and impact on daily activities following each vaccination strategy.

Results: Of 45,215 infants receiving NIP and MenB vaccines at the 2-, 4-, 6- and 12-month timepoints (with or without other vaccines), 72% (32,751/45,215) received concomitant vaccination. Excluding those with additional vaccines, 10,959 were included in the analysis. The adjusted model showed the cumulative risk of any AEFI was lower under the concomitant strategy compared with the separate strategy at 2 months (29% [95% credible interval (CrI), 26% to 31%] vs. 35% [95% CrI, 31% to 40%], risk difference -6.7 [95% CrI, -11.5 to -2.2]) and similar at 4 months (45% [95% CrI, 43% to 48%] vs. 47% [95% CrI, 43% to 52%]), 6 months (45% [95% CrI, 42% to 49%] vs. 44% [95% CrI, 38% to 50%]) and 12 months (47% [95% CrI, 45% to 50%] vs. 52% [95% CrI, 48% to 56%]). Medical review within 3 days was lower at 12 months in the concomitant group (4.1% [95% CrI, 3.4% to 5.0%] vs. separate 6.3% [95% CrI, 4.7% to 8.3%], risk difference -2.2 [-4.3 to -0.4]) and comparable across earlier time points (concomitant 2.3%-4.2% vs. separate 3.6%-3.9%). Impact on daily activities was low (concomitant 1.1%-8.5% vs. separate 1.6%-8.3%) with no differences observed between strategies.

Conclusions: Separating MenB vaccines from routine NIP vaccines does not reduce, and may increase, the cumulative reaction burden across visits. Findings support concomitant administration.

小于15月龄婴儿同时接种B型脑膜炎球菌和国家免疫规划疫苗的短期安全性:一项基于调查的监测研究
目的:研究在2个月、4个月、6个月和12个月时间点接种脑膜炎球菌B (MenB)疫苗和国家免疫规划(NIP)疫苗的婴儿与在单独访问时接种疫苗的婴儿的短期安全性结果。研究类型:观察性队列调查研究。设置,参与者:通过AusVaxSafety进行在线调查,在免疫接种后3天发送,以收集免疫接种后不良事件(AEFIs)的报告。主要结果测量:贝叶斯多项logistic回归估计报告任何AEFI的风险,医学审查和对每种疫苗接种策略后日常活动的影响。结果:45,215名婴儿在2、4、6和12个月的时间点(有或没有其他疫苗)接种了NIP和MenB疫苗,72%(32,751/45,215)接受了联合疫苗接种。排除那些接种了额外疫苗的人,共有10959人被纳入分析。调整模型显示任何免疫接种后不良事件的累积风险较低的伴随下战略比单独的2个月(29%(95%可信区间(CrI), 26%到31%)和35% (CrI 95%, 31%到40%),风险差异-6.7(95%置信区间,-11.5 - -2.2))和类似的4个月(45% (CrI 95%, 43%到48%)和47% (CrI 95%, 43%到52%)),6个月(45% (CrI 95%, 42%到49%)和44% (CrI 95%, 38%到50%))和12个月(47% (CrI 95%, 45%到50%)和52% (CrI 95%, 48%到56%))。合并组在12个月时3天内的医学复查较低(4.1% [95% CrI, 3.4%至5.0%]与单独的6.3% [95% CrI, 4.7%至8.3%],风险差异-2.2[-4.3至-0.4]),并且在早期时间点具有可比性(合并组2.3%-4.2%与单独的3.6%-3.9%)。对日常活动的影响较低(伴随1.1%-8.5% vs单独1.6%-8.3%),两种策略之间没有差异。结论:从常规NIP疫苗中分离MenB疫苗不会减少,可能会增加每次就诊的累积反应负担。研究结果支持联合用药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Australia
Medical Journal of Australia 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
410
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) stands as Australia's foremost general medical journal, leading the dissemination of high-quality research and commentary to shape health policy and influence medical practices within the country. Under the leadership of Professor Virginia Barbour, the expert editorial team at MJA is dedicated to providing authors with a constructive and collaborative peer-review and publication process. Established in 1914, the MJA has evolved into a modern journal that upholds its founding values, maintaining a commitment to supporting the medical profession by delivering high-quality and pertinent information essential to medical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书