An umbrella review of facilitators and barriers to the adoption, spread and sustainability of AI solutions within hospital settings.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Sigrún Eyrúnardóttir Clark, Sanjoli Mathur, Yolanda Barrado-Martín, Ahmed El-Sayed, Yue Zhao, Yiqing Li, Zarnie Khadjesari, Fiona Stevenson, Manish K Tiwari, Ryo Torii, Laurence B Lovat, Cecilia Vindrola-Padros
{"title":"An umbrella review of facilitators and barriers to the adoption, spread and sustainability of AI solutions within hospital settings.","authors":"Sigrún Eyrúnardóttir Clark, Sanjoli Mathur, Yolanda Barrado-Martín, Ahmed El-Sayed, Yue Zhao, Yiqing Li, Zarnie Khadjesari, Fiona Stevenson, Manish K Tiwari, Ryo Torii, Laurence B Lovat, Cecilia Vindrola-Padros","doi":"10.1177/13558196261486714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare settings, but challenges exist with AI adoption and its long-term use. This umbrella review funded by the NIHR (NIHR205439), aimed to identify the facilitators and barriers of AI implementation within hospitals and was registered on PROSPERO. Five databases (MEDLINE, HMIC, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science and Cochrane Reviews) were searched in January 2025 and re-run in February 2026, 1184 articles were screened, with 20 included. The inclusion criteria encompassed reviews implementing AI within hospital settings. The quality of the data were assessed using the ROBIS checklist and data were synthesised using the NASSS (Nonadoption, Abandonment, and challenges to the Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability) framework. We found AI implementation was affected by: whether an AI solution as an intervention had been externally validated to ensure generalisability across different settings; evidence that the AI solution brings measurable gains; the level of trust in and understanding of the AI solution among hospital staff; the budgets and resources available to onboard the AI solution, train staff, and maintain the solution; the need for national policies on funding and regulating AI solutions. These factors affected the adoption, spread, scalability, and sustainability of AI implementation and should be considered for future implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"13558196261486714"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196261486714","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare settings, but challenges exist with AI adoption and its long-term use. This umbrella review funded by the NIHR (NIHR205439), aimed to identify the facilitators and barriers of AI implementation within hospitals and was registered on PROSPERO. Five databases (MEDLINE, HMIC, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science and Cochrane Reviews) were searched in January 2025 and re-run in February 2026, 1184 articles were screened, with 20 included. The inclusion criteria encompassed reviews implementing AI within hospital settings. The quality of the data were assessed using the ROBIS checklist and data were synthesised using the NASSS (Nonadoption, Abandonment, and challenges to the Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability) framework. We found AI implementation was affected by: whether an AI solution as an intervention had been externally validated to ensure generalisability across different settings; evidence that the AI solution brings measurable gains; the level of trust in and understanding of the AI solution among hospital staff; the budgets and resources available to onboard the AI solution, train staff, and maintain the solution; the need for national policies on funding and regulating AI solutions. These factors affected the adoption, spread, scalability, and sustainability of AI implementation and should be considered for future implementation.

对医院环境中人工智能解决方案的采用、传播和可持续性的促进因素和障碍进行全面审查。
人工智能(AI)在医疗保健环境中的使用越来越多,但人工智能的采用和长期使用存在挑战。这项总括性审查由美国国家卫生研究院(NIHR205439)资助,旨在确定医院内实施人工智能的促进因素和障碍,并在PROSPERO上进行了注册。于2025年1月检索MEDLINE、HMIC、CINAHL Plus、Web of Science和Cochrane Reviews 5个数据库,并于2026年2月重新运行,共筛选1184篇文章,纳入20篇。纳入标准包括在医院环境中实施人工智能的审查。使用ROBIS检查表评估数据的质量,并使用NASSS(未采用、放弃以及对规模扩大、传播和可持续性的挑战)框架对数据进行综合。我们发现人工智能的实施受到以下因素的影响:作为干预手段的人工智能解决方案是否经过了外部验证,以确保在不同环境下的通用性;人工智能解决方案带来可衡量收益的证据;医院员工对人工智能解决方案的信任和理解程度;用于安装人工智能解决方案、培训员工和维护解决方案的预算和资源;需要制定资助和监管人工智能解决方案的国家政策。这些因素影响了人工智能实施的采用、传播、可扩展性和可持续性,应该在未来的实施中加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Journal of Health Services Research & Policy provides a unique opportunity to explore the ideas, policies and decisions shaping health services throughout the world. Edited and peer-reviewed by experts in the field and with a high academic standard and multidisciplinary approach, readers will gain a greater understanding of the current issues in healthcare policy and research. The journal"s strong international editorial advisory board also ensures that readers obtain a truly global and insightful perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书