Navigating Whiteness in Australia's Anti-Racism Movement: A Duoethnographic Inquiry by Women of Colour Scholars

IF 1.8 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES
Australian Journal of Social Issues Pub Date : 2026-09-21 Epub Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1002/ajs4.70056
Franka Vaughan, Aish Ravi
{"title":"Navigating Whiteness in Australia's Anti-Racism Movement: A Duoethnographic Inquiry by Women of Colour Scholars","authors":"Franka Vaughan,&nbsp;Aish Ravi","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.70056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper applies Critical Race Theory (CRT) to explore how whiteness operates within Australia's anti-racism movement as a structuring force that shapes discourse, practice and policy. Despite the anti-racism movement offering crucial spaces for resistance and reform, it remains entangled in Australia's settler-colonial present and systemic racism that disproportionately affect Indigenous peoples and other Culturally and Racially Minoritised (CARM) communities. Structural forces, including the dominance of white institutional actors and the persistence of ‘white saviourism’ continue to set the terms of engagement, often constraining the transformative potential of anti-racism efforts. Drawing on duoethnography, this paper is grounded in a series of reflective conversations between two colleagues, both women of colour, working within anti-racism research and activism. Through these dialogues, we examine the tensions, exclusions and opportunities that arise within these spaces where whiteness continues to dominate. We challenge the marginalisation of CARM researchers, who are often treated as subjects rather than active participants in shaping research and policy. Our analysis highlights the need to centre racialised voices and promote community-led collaboration. Through this reflection, we seek to deepen understanding of how whiteness functions as a system of power within anti-racism and advocate for more equitable, inclusive approaches to racial justice in the Australian context.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":"61 3","pages":"446-458"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajs4.70056","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajs4.70056","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper applies Critical Race Theory (CRT) to explore how whiteness operates within Australia's anti-racism movement as a structuring force that shapes discourse, practice and policy. Despite the anti-racism movement offering crucial spaces for resistance and reform, it remains entangled in Australia's settler-colonial present and systemic racism that disproportionately affect Indigenous peoples and other Culturally and Racially Minoritised (CARM) communities. Structural forces, including the dominance of white institutional actors and the persistence of ‘white saviourism’ continue to set the terms of engagement, often constraining the transformative potential of anti-racism efforts. Drawing on duoethnography, this paper is grounded in a series of reflective conversations between two colleagues, both women of colour, working within anti-racism research and activism. Through these dialogues, we examine the tensions, exclusions and opportunities that arise within these spaces where whiteness continues to dominate. We challenge the marginalisation of CARM researchers, who are often treated as subjects rather than active participants in shaping research and policy. Our analysis highlights the need to centre racialised voices and promote community-led collaboration. Through this reflection, we seek to deepen understanding of how whiteness functions as a system of power within anti-racism and advocate for more equitable, inclusive approaches to racial justice in the Australian context.

在澳大利亚反种族主义运动中导航白人:有色人种女性学者的多民族志调查
本文运用批判种族理论(CRT)来探讨白人如何在澳大利亚的反种族主义运动中作为一种塑造话语、实践和政策的结构性力量发挥作用。尽管反种族主义运动为抵抗和改革提供了至关重要的空间,但它仍然与澳大利亚的移民-殖民现状和系统性种族主义纠缠在一起,这些种族主义不成比例地影响着土著人民和其他文化和种族少数群体(CARM)社区。结构性力量,包括白人机构参与者的主导地位和“白人救世主主义”的持续存在,继续设定参与的条件,往往限制了反种族主义努力的变革潜力。在多元人种学的基础上,本文以两位同事之间的一系列反思对话为基础,这两位同事都是有色人种,从事反种族主义研究和行动主义。通过这些对话,我们审视了在这些白人继续占主导地位的空间中出现的紧张、排斥和机会。我们挑战CARM研究人员的边缘化,他们经常被视为受试者,而不是制定研究和政策的积极参与者。我们的分析强调,需要集中种族化的声音,促进社区主导的合作。通过这种反思,我们试图加深对白人如何在反种族主义中作为一种权力体系的理解,并倡导在澳大利亚的背景下采取更公平、更包容的方式来实现种族正义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书