Organising for Political Advocacy-the Case of the Netzwerk Solidarische Landwirtschaft.

IF 1.9 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Leonie Guerrero Lara, Baldur Kapusta, Jessica Duncan, Giuseppe Feola
{"title":"Organising for Political Advocacy-the Case of the <i>Netzwerk Solidarische Landwirtschaft</i>.","authors":"Leonie Guerrero Lara, Baldur Kapusta, Jessica Duncan, Giuseppe Feola","doi":"10.1007/s10767-025-09537-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article analyses the efforts by the German Community-Supported Agriculture (CSA) network to carry out political advocacy work as a strategy to strengthen the movement and induce change in the industrial agri-food system-a strategy which thus far has been omitted by studies on CSA. To address this gap, we build on the literature on social movements and advocacy groups. Drawing on experiences with political advocacy between 2018 and 2022, this article maps enabling factors and barriers for advocacy as well as the related internal debates and contestations. We find that the organisational structure of the network (or in some instances, the lack thereof) influences strategies and tactics, resources, emotions and group dynamics, and advocacy spaces. The study concludes that advocates should pay due attention to their movement's organisational structure in relation to advocacy, including potential tensions around member participation in decision-making, responsibilities, and legitimacy of advocates. Attention should also be paid to the visibility and valorisation of advocacy work, and (mis-)matches between the internal structure and advocacy spaces.</p>","PeriodicalId":45635,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Politics Culture and Society","volume":"39 3","pages":"495-526"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13585796/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Politics Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-025-09537-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyses the efforts by the German Community-Supported Agriculture (CSA) network to carry out political advocacy work as a strategy to strengthen the movement and induce change in the industrial agri-food system-a strategy which thus far has been omitted by studies on CSA. To address this gap, we build on the literature on social movements and advocacy groups. Drawing on experiences with political advocacy between 2018 and 2022, this article maps enabling factors and barriers for advocacy as well as the related internal debates and contestations. We find that the organisational structure of the network (or in some instances, the lack thereof) influences strategies and tactics, resources, emotions and group dynamics, and advocacy spaces. The study concludes that advocates should pay due attention to their movement's organisational structure in relation to advocacy, including potential tensions around member participation in decision-making, responsibilities, and legitimacy of advocates. Attention should also be paid to the visibility and valorisation of advocacy work, and (mis-)matches between the internal structure and advocacy spaces.

组织政治宣传——以网络联盟为例。
本文分析了德国社区支持农业(CSA)网络开展政治宣传工作的努力,作为加强运动和诱导工业化农业食品系统变革的策略,这一策略迄今为止被CSA研究所忽略。为了解决这一差距,我们以社会运动和倡导团体的文献为基础。根据2018年至2022年的政治倡导经验,本文描绘了倡导的促成因素和障碍,以及相关的内部辩论和争论。我们发现,网络的组织结构(或在某些情况下,缺乏组织结构)影响战略和战术,资源,情感和群体动态,以及倡导空间。该研究的结论是,倡议者应适当关注与倡导相关的运动组织结构,包括围绕成员参与决策、责任和倡议者合法性的潜在紧张关系。还应注意宣传工作的可见性和价值化,以及内部结构与宣传空间之间的(不)匹配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society welcomes original articles on issues arising at the intersection of nations, states, civil societies, and global institutions and processes. The editors are particularly interested in article manuscripts dealing with changing patterns in world economic and political institutions; analysis of ethnic groups, social classes, religions, personal networks, and special interests; changes in mass culture, propaganda, and technologies of communication and their social effects; and the impact of social transformations on the changing order of public and private life. The journal is interdisciplinary in orientation and international in scope, and is not tethered to particular theoretical or research traditions. The journal presents material of varying length, from research notes to article-length monographs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书